Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism VS Public schools
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tomk80" data-source="post: 47869561" data-attributes="member: 33800"><p>I'm going to kick myself for following in another switch of topic, but anyway.</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Good, a creationist way of thinking has not contributed to science. Thanks for admitting that.</p><p></p><p>No, it is not. Evolution is a scientific theory and a scientific fact. We can observe it happening and it leads to testable hypotheses. Creationism doesn't do that. It cannot be tested, or if it can it has been falsified. It is not science.</p><p></p><p>No, it is not. It is a testable theory. How is it a religion? What characteristics of cult thinking or religion does it have?</p><p></p><p>And the hallmark of science is that it is testable. Evolution is, creationism is not, or where it is has been falsified. That is why evolution is science and creationism is not.</p><p></p><p>The point we make is that those scientists holding to creationism, never use creationism in doing science. Meanwhile, scientists holding to the theory of evolution do use that to do good science. See the difference?</p><p> </p><p></p><p>Great, how about horses? We'll trace horses back all the way. Allright? Will you stop changing topics if we do that? If you say yes, I'll be happy to start a thread on it. But you'll have to stay on topic in that for a change.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tomk80, post: 47869561, member: 33800"] I'm going to kick myself for following in another switch of topic, but anyway. Good, a creationist way of thinking has not contributed to science. Thanks for admitting that. No, it is not. Evolution is a scientific theory and a scientific fact. We can observe it happening and it leads to testable hypotheses. Creationism doesn't do that. It cannot be tested, or if it can it has been falsified. It is not science. No, it is not. It is a testable theory. How is it a religion? What characteristics of cult thinking or religion does it have? And the hallmark of science is that it is testable. Evolution is, creationism is not, or where it is has been falsified. That is why evolution is science and creationism is not. The point we make is that those scientists holding to creationism, never use creationism in doing science. Meanwhile, scientists holding to the theory of evolution do use that to do good science. See the difference? Great, how about horses? We'll trace horses back all the way. Allright? Will you stop changing topics if we do that? If you say yes, I'll be happy to start a thread on it. But you'll have to stay on topic in that for a change. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Creationism VS Public schools
Top
Bottom