Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Coal has killed more than WW2 since 1970
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="eclipsenow" data-source="post: 68533926" data-attributes="member: 274355"><p>Sorry, but 2.6 million people a year is not 'possibly' but INEVITABLY KILLED BY COAL.</p><p>Climate change is inevitable due to coal.</p><p>Increased public health costs equal to the cost of the coal electricity itself is inevitable with coal.</p><p>Lying coal-barons that fund anti-climate science memes going through elderly groups, political groups, and even church groups is inevitable with coal.</p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]IaKm89eVhoE[/MEDIA]</p><p></p><p>If you agree that coal killing 2.6 million people worldwide is BAD, that climate change is BAD, that coal barons 'externalising' the public health costs is BAD, then what are you going to do about it? Are you going to write to your Senator or local rep? Are you going to read up about it all and decide for yourself the best way forward, and then agitate for that? We live in a relatively over-entertained society. Blogging and chatting about these serious matters is the exception, not the rule. So it's up to you. What are you doing about it? I'm doing all I can, but because we live in democracies I need your help. Every little bit counts.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="eclipsenow, post: 68533926, member: 274355"] Sorry, but 2.6 million people a year is not 'possibly' but INEVITABLY KILLED BY COAL. Climate change is inevitable due to coal. Increased public health costs equal to the cost of the coal electricity itself is inevitable with coal. Lying coal-barons that fund anti-climate science memes going through elderly groups, political groups, and even church groups is inevitable with coal. [MEDIA=youtube]IaKm89eVhoE[/MEDIA] If you agree that coal killing 2.6 million people worldwide is BAD, that climate change is BAD, that coal barons 'externalising' the public health costs is BAD, then what are you going to do about it? Are you going to write to your Senator or local rep? Are you going to read up about it all and decide for yourself the best way forward, and then agitate for that? We live in a relatively over-entertained society. Blogging and chatting about these serious matters is the exception, not the rule. So it's up to you. What are you doing about it? I'm doing all I can, but because we live in democracies I need your help. Every little bit counts. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Coal has killed more than WW2 since 1970
Top
Bottom