Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Big contradictions in the evolution theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jet Black" data-source="post: 17609944"><p>interesting, we will test that against the evidence:</p><p></p><p>as I glance through the pages of Douglas Futuyma's Evolutionary Biology, Maynard Smith's "The Theory of evolution" and my other assorted textbooks, not once do I see an ad hominem, I see no lies and so on. where are they all?</p><p></p><p>error #1 people are by definition apes.</p><p></p><p>error #2 strawman comaprison.</p><p></p><p>there are a number of interpretations</p><p></p><p>error #3, it shows that Christian knows what they are talking about.</p><p></p><p>you know that it could be you who does not know how to listen?</p><p></p><p>No True Scotsman fallacy.</p><p></p><p>ipse dixiet. please back up your statements.</p><p></p><p>hold on, which sciences here are "true sciences"? In your claim that the universe is a mere 6000 or so years old, you are in one sentence claiming that geology, paleontology, chemistry, cosmology, relativity, optics, nuclear physics, stellar mechanics, quantum mechanics and a whole bunch of other parts of science are wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jet Black, post: 17609944"] interesting, we will test that against the evidence: as I glance through the pages of Douglas Futuyma's Evolutionary Biology, Maynard Smith's "The Theory of evolution" and my other assorted textbooks, not once do I see an ad hominem, I see no lies and so on. where are they all? error #1 people are by definition apes. error #2 strawman comaprison. there are a number of interpretations error #3, it shows that Christian knows what they are talking about. you know that it could be you who does not know how to listen? No True Scotsman fallacy. ipse dixiet. please back up your statements. hold on, which sciences here are "true sciences"? In your claim that the universe is a mere 6000 or so years old, you are in one sentence claiming that geology, paleontology, chemistry, cosmology, relativity, optics, nuclear physics, stellar mechanics, quantum mechanics and a whole bunch of other parts of science are wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Big contradictions in the evolution theory
Top
Bottom