Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Big contradictions in the evolution theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heather S." data-source="post: 17598138" data-attributes="member: 115695"><p>1) Do you agree that an organism is always slightly different than it's parents? (<<<< - This requires a YES or NO answer).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>It's not that they <em>can't</em>, it's that they <em>don't</em> (usually). The problem here is that these concept's require some intelligence in order to understand, and you apparently lack this rather useful trait. But I'll try just for the heck of it.</p><p> </p><p>You see, a species is a population of animals that typically (in a normal environment) does not interbreed with members of another species. Albeit, in unfavorable habitat conditions, many species of aquatic turtles and other species will interbreed with other species to create a hybrid (sometimes fertile, sometimes not). However they are still different species because in normal conditions, they do not interbreed.</p><p> </p><p>And this doesn't even touch upon ring species or mixes between subspecies or other fuzzy differences between some populations of animals.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>First of all, STOP using humans as your example. We are not good examples of evolution right now because of the ways in which we combat natural selection. Second of all, hybridization is NOT evolution. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Humans can produce fertilized eggs with other animals (other apes).</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Well, obviously this IS possible, so bring out your next strawman attack.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heather S., post: 17598138, member: 115695"] 1) Do you agree that an organism is always slightly different than it's parents? (<<<< - This requires a YES or NO answer). It's not that they [i]can't[/i], it's that they [i]don't[/i] (usually). The problem here is that these concept's require some intelligence in order to understand, and you apparently lack this rather useful trait. But I'll try just for the heck of it. You see, a species is a population of animals that typically (in a normal environment) does not interbreed with members of another species. Albeit, in unfavorable habitat conditions, many species of aquatic turtles and other species will interbreed with other species to create a hybrid (sometimes fertile, sometimes not). However they are still different species because in normal conditions, they do not interbreed. And this doesn't even touch upon ring species or mixes between subspecies or other fuzzy differences between some populations of animals. First of all, STOP using humans as your example. We are not good examples of evolution right now because of the ways in which we combat natural selection. Second of all, hybridization is NOT evolution. Humans can produce fertilized eggs with other animals (other apes). Well, obviously this IS possible, so bring out your next strawman attack. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Big contradictions in the evolution theory
Top
Bottom