Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Biden campaign reneging on transparency promise.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="rjs330" data-source="post: 75415554" data-attributes="member: 377008"><p>And this is why elections have consequences. Mcconnell utilized his legal power and did NOTHING wrong. I don't understand why it's such a deal. The Senate is not required to vote in the Nominee just cause one is presented. </p><p></p><p>Stacking the court would also be perfectly legal under the Constitution. Congress would need to pass the requirement and the president could sign it. Which would be a consequence of an all Democrat Congress and presidency. So if the Dems will the house Senate and executive branch they absolutely would have a right to stack the court. The downside of that is it could go the other way as well. Once the Republicans gain power they could stack the court themselves. </p><p></p><p>It's a dangerous game to play. I think that's why the Dems want DC to be a state. So they can get two more Senators and more representatives. Giving them a good chance of power I perpetuity. A dangerous game they are playing. And goes to show you exactly how they would operate. </p><p></p><p>You know good a well if the Democrats hold power there is no way they would confirm a Constitutional Judge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="rjs330, post: 75415554, member: 377008"] And this is why elections have consequences. Mcconnell utilized his legal power and did NOTHING wrong. I don't understand why it's such a deal. The Senate is not required to vote in the Nominee just cause one is presented. Stacking the court would also be perfectly legal under the Constitution. Congress would need to pass the requirement and the president could sign it. Which would be a consequence of an all Democrat Congress and presidency. So if the Dems will the house Senate and executive branch they absolutely would have a right to stack the court. The downside of that is it could go the other way as well. Once the Republicans gain power they could stack the court themselves. It's a dangerous game to play. I think that's why the Dems want DC to be a state. So they can get two more Senators and more representatives. Giving them a good chance of power I perpetuity. A dangerous game they are playing. And goes to show you exactly how they would operate. You know good a well if the Democrats hold power there is no way they would confirm a Constitutional Judge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Biden campaign reneging on transparency promise.
Top
Bottom