Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical predictions and checking data
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DonaldW112" data-source="post: 187011" data-attributes="member: 2717"><p>I am not talking pre-flood. I believe Noah lived to be quite old as well, correct? We should be able to see this population expansion and then contraction in post-flood records. Also, the pre-flood records should be easy to find even if mostly under water. All pre-flood records should be under the very thick sediment section representing the flood. This sediment should be world-wide and contain fossils from all "kinds". Isn't this what you would predict from the flood? It is too bad we have not found a layer like this. Your thought process is exactly right, please try making prediction based on the flood.</p><p></p><p>To the other posters here. I don't think we should harp on Nick's tooth example. I think we should encourage him to use this thought process to examine all aspects of the Genesis story. While you might find a couple of things that might be evidence for some things in Genesis, I think he would quickly see that many things directly contradict the Genesis account.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DonaldW112, post: 187011, member: 2717"] I am not talking pre-flood. I believe Noah lived to be quite old as well, correct? We should be able to see this population expansion and then contraction in post-flood records. Also, the pre-flood records should be easy to find even if mostly under water. All pre-flood records should be under the very thick sediment section representing the flood. This sediment should be world-wide and contain fossils from all "kinds". Isn't this what you would predict from the flood? It is too bad we have not found a layer like this. Your thought process is exactly right, please try making prediction based on the flood. To the other posters here. I don't think we should harp on Nick's tooth example. I think we should encourage him to use this thought process to examine all aspects of the Genesis story. While you might find a couple of things that might be evidence for some things in Genesis, I think he would quickly see that many things directly contradict the Genesis account. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical predictions and checking data
Top
Bottom