Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Try At Examining Alleged Evidence For The Darwinian Process
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="justlookinla" data-source="post: 68705268" data-attributes="member: 350007"><p>Hopefully we can establish or dismiss the alleged evidence before another thread is shut down. I ask that everyone simply address the issues and the claims.</p><p></p><p>Now, this was offered as an example of evidence for the HOW, the process whereby both pine trees and humans were produced from an alleged single life form (unknown at this time) of long ago.</p><p></p><p>This is the post containing the alleged evidence for the HOW, the process, based on the scientific method....</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.christianforums.com/threads/how-much-longer.7910094/page-26#post-68695191" target="_blank">http://www.christianforums.com/threads/how-much-longer.7910094/page-26#post-68695191</a></p><p></p><p>----------------------------------------------</p><p></p><p>This was my response to the post claiming the alleged evidence....</p><p></p><p>I'm going to take it step by step to make sure we adequately cover everything. Starting with your 3 points...</p><p></p><p>"1. Make an observation- It appears that the diversity of life is related.</p><p></p><p>2. Ask a question (s)- Is all life on earth related? If so, <strong>HOW</strong> did this happen?</p><p></p><p>3. Make a hypothesis- All living things on earth are related. This is a process of evolution by random mutations and natural selection."</p><p>You've begun at the outset to once again make this about common ancestry. "Related" and "all living things on earth are related" isn't the issue, as I've pointed out probably hundreds of times now.</p><p></p><p>Now, your next claim in #3...."This is a process of evolution by random mutations and natural selection." This is the issue. You made a claim that the process which created all life we observe today, pine trees and humans, snails and elephants are the result of "random mutations and natural selection".</p><p></p><p>Now, taking your first point and lets see if it offers the evidence, based on the scientific method, for your claim.</p><p></p><p>"<strong>A. </strong>Comparative anatomy conclusion- "Organisms that are closely related to one another share many anatomical similarities"<a href="http://www.evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/IIBcomparative.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/IIBcomparative.shtml</a>"</p><p>Point out in your statement where the evidence is offered, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process (mutation and natural selection?) which produced all life we observe today from an alleged single life form of long ago.</p><p></p><p>And again...and again...and again...I'm not asking about common ancestry, about relatedness, I'm asking about the HOW, the process itself. When you identify the process, based on evidence, based on the scientific method in A, we'll examine B.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="justlookinla, post: 68705268, member: 350007"] Hopefully we can establish or dismiss the alleged evidence before another thread is shut down. I ask that everyone simply address the issues and the claims. Now, this was offered as an example of evidence for the HOW, the process whereby both pine trees and humans were produced from an alleged single life form (unknown at this time) of long ago. This is the post containing the alleged evidence for the HOW, the process, based on the scientific method.... [URL]http://www.christianforums.com/threads/how-much-longer.7910094/page-26#post-68695191[/URL] ---------------------------------------------- This was my response to the post claiming the alleged evidence.... I'm going to take it step by step to make sure we adequately cover everything. Starting with your 3 points... "1. Make an observation- It appears that the diversity of life is related. 2. Ask a question (s)- Is all life on earth related? If so, [B]HOW[/B] did this happen? 3. Make a hypothesis- All living things on earth are related. This is a process of evolution by random mutations and natural selection." You've begun at the outset to once again make this about common ancestry. "Related" and "all living things on earth are related" isn't the issue, as I've pointed out probably hundreds of times now. Now, your next claim in #3...."This is a process of evolution by random mutations and natural selection." This is the issue. You made a claim that the process which created all life we observe today, pine trees and humans, snails and elephants are the result of "random mutations and natural selection". Now, taking your first point and lets see if it offers the evidence, based on the scientific method, for your claim. "[B]A. [/B]Comparative anatomy conclusion- "Organisms that are closely related to one another share many anatomical similarities"[URL]http://www.evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/lines/IIBcomparative.shtml[/URL]" Point out in your statement where the evidence is offered, based on the scientific method, for the HOW, the process (mutation and natural selection?) which produced all life we observe today from an alleged single life form of long ago. And again...and again...and again...I'm not asking about common ancestry, about relatedness, I'm asking about the HOW, the process itself. When you identify the process, based on evidence, based on the scientific method in A, we'll examine B. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Try At Examining Alleged Evidence For The Darwinian Process
Top
Bottom