Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Try At Examining Alleged Evidence For The Darwinian Process
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="essentialsaltes" data-source="post: 68700408" data-attributes="member: 294566"><p>Just to try to narrow the field a bit. If it can be demonstrated that <strong>one pair</strong> of organisms with many anatomical similarities (we won't presuppose their relatedness) have genetic similarities, but also important genetic <strong>differences</strong> that could be explained by <strong>mutations</strong>...</p><p></p><p>could we conclude that they probably <strong>are</strong> related by common descent? And that at least as a start, it is now <strong>a plausible hypothesis</strong> that other pairs of similar creatures might also be explained by the same mechanism?</p><p></p><p>Obviously, as a practical matter, it's impossible to provide this evidence for every single life form that is observed today in this forum. But would one solid demonstration at least place this hypothesis on the table in your mind? Or does it take 10 demonstrations? Or 100? Or must we provide evidence for 'all life we observe today'?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="essentialsaltes, post: 68700408, member: 294566"] Just to try to narrow the field a bit. If it can be demonstrated that [B]one pair[/B] of organisms with many anatomical similarities (we won't presuppose their relatedness) have genetic similarities, but also important genetic [B]differences[/B] that could be explained by [B]mutations[/B]... could we conclude that they probably [B]are[/B] related by common descent? And that at least as a start, it is now [B]a plausible hypothesis[/B] that other pairs of similar creatures might also be explained by the same mechanism? Obviously, as a practical matter, it's impossible to provide this evidence for every single life form that is observed today in this forum. But would one solid demonstration at least place this hypothesis on the table in your mind? Or does it take 10 demonstrations? Or 100? Or must we provide evidence for 'all life we observe today'? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Another Try At Examining Alleged Evidence For The Darwinian Process
Top
Bottom