Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A question from a creation website
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 68557554" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>Are these observations?</p><p></p><p>Physical features found in species, physical features found in fossils, DNA sequences of genomes, placement of ERV's in genomes, observations of retroviruses inserting into genomes, random mutations with respect to fitness, and the natural selection of alleles in specific environments.</p><p></p><p>I count those as observations, and they are the observations we use to test the theory of evolution.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>Do you think chimps could suddenly give birth to fully modern humans? Or, do you think that chimps and humans are different because the DNA sequence of their genomes is different?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nowhere in the scientific method do you observe the hypothesis. Observations and hypotheses are two different things.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 68557554, member: 11790"] Are these observations? Physical features found in species, physical features found in fossils, DNA sequences of genomes, placement of ERV's in genomes, observations of retroviruses inserting into genomes, random mutations with respect to fitness, and the natural selection of alleles in specific environments. I count those as observations, and they are the observations we use to test the theory of evolution. Do you think chimps could suddenly give birth to fully modern humans? Or, do you think that chimps and humans are different because the DNA sequence of their genomes is different? Nowhere in the scientific method do you observe the hypothesis. Observations and hypotheses are two different things. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
A question from a creation website
Top
Bottom