Search results

Your opinion. And why does Heb. say that a change of priesthood requires a change of law (Heb. 7:12)? Your opinion. But John uses Roman time, not Jewish time. See the clear proof here...

I use the NASB for most studies, and IMO it's more accurate than the KJV in some cases (although minor). There is no variance that changes any Christian doctrine. If someone "finds" something that does, they're looking in the wrong place IMO.

Don't be quick to judge, as you are being argumentative here. Your idea that I'm missing something is not convincing. "Breaking bread" is a way of saying communion and meal both, as they did at other times. Your interpretation that it meant only having a meal is speculation.

According to the context of the verses containing the phrase "first day of the week" (esp. John 20:19, Acts 20:7, 1 Cor. 16:2), this is when Christians met together to break bread in worship of Christ and celebration of His resurrection (in contrast to worshipping in the synagogues with the...

Coincidences are not miracles. In fact, the original KJV translators admitted in writing that their translation was NOT inspired of God. And the guy in the video uses stupid numerology to prove that the KJV is "the inspired word of God." How ludicrous. In fact, one way to avoid "KJV Holy Bible"...

How do you know? When Christians come together in Christ's name, it is a worship service. It clearly states they met "on the first day of the week to break bread" which is clearly a worship service.

How does this address my objection?

So you think that the apostle Paul in Acts 20 was missing the mark when he preached until midnight?

I saw part of it, and decided not to continue because it's a typical religious talk show. I evaluated what YOU said he was doing.

I don't know what you mean by that. Usually when someone presents a comparison like that which contrasts events, they are saying or implying that it's a contradiction. Of course, it depends on the agenda of the individual. If you would have stated what your reason was, instead of merely...

Did you read my answers here: https://www.christianforums.com/threads/how-do-you-explain-the-existence-of-evil-despite-god-being-almighty-and-all-knowing-and-perfect-love.8298906/post-77664509 We can know how God thinks by becoming familiar with the Holy Bible, which is God's revelation of...

There is nothing new about this list of 5 ways, it's just using different words for the same traditional readings, if I understand it correctly. However, there is a lot missing from it. 1. "The written scripture" - is extremely vague. I didn't watch the video, so I don't know the context of this...

Who will be after? Are you asking if there will be more people populating the Earth after the great white throne judgment? I don't think that's going to happen. After Satan is thrown into the lake of fire, death and Hades will be thrown into the lake of fire, and also everyone whose name is not...

No, but as it's written, it seems to imply that you're advocating that it's a contradiction.

Why can't both of those be true? We can see that the two testimonies written by 2 different people wrote their statement for a different reason, and from a different perspective. Matthew's point was that Judas was unrepentant and committed suicide out of the misery of guilt. Luke wrote that...

Evil exists because of sin: when created beings (angels or men) decide to disobey the moral law of God, and the consequence is that evil permeates all things. Sin is far-reaching, and is the reason there is a lake of fire judgment coming. The Bible says that God will judge everyone according to...

What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? Are you hiding behind words with the other poster? What's your point?

What does this have to do with the price of tea in China? I wondered if your response deserved a reply, since you're imposing something onto the scripture text that is completely unrelated to it.

What's your point? Do you think Luther became anti-Christ?

I think you already know, because you seem to be making an excuse for your reaction to them, explaining how you think you're right about it. And it doesn't take a psychologist to see that they are offended by their reaction which you described. As to the WHY, you believe they are unbelievers...