Search results

Source: Trust me bro. Conservatives understand that things change, but not always for the better. This change of allowing biological men in women's spaces is not for the better. That is why conservative are rightfully against it.

Yes, but the two usually go hand in hand.

I don't doubt that you accept it, but I find it strange you didn't have this issue about the student's faith being imposed upon when It was the Christian teacher's faith being imposed upon. You said the teacher should find another job if they didn't want to follow the school's policy, well I say...

Oh so you do accept this ruling? With all the complaining you're doing about the judges decision favoring one faith over the other I thought you were apposed to their ruling.

Interesting. When I asked you in another thread if you would accept a judge's ruling on the side of a Christian teacher who refused to use pronouns, you said you saw no reason why you wouldn't. But now that this judge has ruled on the side of this Christian teacher you now have a problem with...

Maybe there isn't one. Or at least there isn't one that will appease both sides.

What would be your solution so neither the teacher or the student impose their faith on each other?

Another stabbing in Sydney. A bishop was stabbed during a live streamed sermon in a Sydney church.

A2SG: You said: "That would be accepting his delusion, and that wouldn't be courteous at all." And I pointed out a case where it would be courteous to accept someone's view of reality being mistaken for some reason. Basically you were making the argument that you can tell Alzheimer's suffers...

How do we know they are being genuine and not just trolling or something more sinister? Why should they have to stop thinking of themselves as a woman? Is that what you're asking? Yet they want everyone else to conform to how they feel. Double standard. That's cause they do it in an...

And you replied to it.

And A2SG's was a comparison to Alzheimer's. I read it and it is a comparison in the same way The Liturgist used it.

I'm glad we agree the man found in the women's bathroom at Planet Fitness shouldn't have been there. Even if they did that they would still be at a physical disadvantage given that there are biological differences that give men an advantage. Also, feminists wouldn't be too happy with a man...

I made lots of "assessments" in that post. I don't know which one you are referring to. You could just tell me what it was instead of leaving vague posts.

Biological sex is irrelevant but their appearance still is relevant to biological women, as I stated in the quote. Would you be fine with putting a trans man that hadn't had any surgeries or injections and looked exactly like a woman, in a UFC cage match with a biological male fighter...

You gave me a link to a whole page. Be more specific please.

This is about women feeling uncomfortable and unsafe. Like Ana The Ist said, this is a one way problem. I never answered your question in the positive and I noticed you never answered my question. So what makes you assume I changed my mind? I'm arguing for biological women's safety. What are...

Which assessment?

If the person you replied to (The Liturgist) said they were not making the comparison, would you believe them too? Why would A2SG bring up Alzheimer's in a discussion about trans people if he wasn't making a comparison?

Someone else here compared trans people to people with Alzheimer's. Should we put them into aged care? After all, that is where people with Alzheimer's usually go.