Search results

The Babylonian captivity was not the tribulation.

Preterism is alive and well, sad to say.

Your usual preterist doctrine.

The preterist has spoken!

Oh ye of little faith.

It is not strange for P70. It is his usual observation.

I agree. Your continuous preterist discussions are bogus.

Preterism continues to raise its ugly head.

Jeremiah and Ezekiel disagree with you.

LOL. You obviously do not even know what replacement theology is.

ebed wrote: Originally Posted by riverrat Danoh wrote: By the way, Ebed, what is your understandting of why they were to "begin at Jerusalem"? ebed wrote: Read Acts 2:4 as the gospel starts: 5 Now there were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven...

Danoh wrote: By the way, Ebed, what is your understandting of why they were to "begin at Jerusalem"? ebed wrote: Read Acts 2:4 as the gospel starts: 5 Now there were Jews living in Jerusalem, devout men from every nation under heaven. It's not hard...it's the FIRST preaching of the...

ebed always has the truth and the other guy always has the error.

Then why do you bother?

BABerean2: According to scripture God made the new covenant with Israel and Judah at the death of Christ. Man made the new covenant with Israel and Judah at the birth of Christ. Who is correct?

Yes, BABerean2ism comes from books but don't forget those you-tube videos.

I get a kick out of reading BABerean2ism. An, by the way, BA HUMBUG!

You are wrong as usual. God did not divide scripture into OT and NT. Man did that. I do not look at videos that you post. Waste of my time.

I say again. Replacement theology is a false doctrine!

Has anyone gotten it all correct? Scripture must be "rightly divided" in order to make any system work. That is the reason that BABerean2ism does not work. You do not know how to "rightly divide."