Search results

Well even if you throw out the whole 6 day literal interpretation, the bible still specifically states that the earth was created before the moon and sun, and the pi equals exactly three. Interesting that a book supposedly inspired by an omniscient being contains factual information that's weak...

nevermind, any way to delete a post?

Can't be done. What's your point? Literal interpretations of Genesis have been proven demonstrably false. If you believe that Genesis is literal history, you are simply mistaken.

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=ben-steins-expelled-review-john-rennie Good read.

Why do you bother Valkhorn?

Any response from the anti-gay crowd that would dispute the statement: "The actions of those morally opposed to homosexuality are largely responsible for many of the perceived problems with homosexuality today." ?

Depends, I don't see sex as inherently anything special (all though it certainly can be) so if I had some assurance that I would contract no diseases and that my identity would be kept confidential I think I would be able to close my eyes, think about Jessica Alba and bear it for a decent amount...

I agree, I never understood the mind of the fire and brimstone towards all that disagree with you crowd. It might have worked centuries ago when you were subjugating natives and trying to scare them out of their tribal shamanistic ways but it impresses no one today and clearly is counter...

I'm just wondering about what the anti-homosexual crowd thinks about the assertion that gay men are as a whole, more promiscuous not because they are gay men but because they are gay men. Straight men would, be they can't, because straight women wont. It's not that being gay makes you more...

And it's not possible at all that you can believe something without taking it literally? If I do not believe that the parables Jesus taught literally happened, does that make them devoid of their moral lessons? Perhaps the writer of genesis did not know the exact processes by which God created...

Whoa whoa whoa, if you aren't allowed to interpret "day" as anything other then a 24 hour period then how can you claim that "death" is anything but the way that we currently think about as death as the end of biological life? And if death means something other then the end of biological life...

No. Were not going to go to your blog. Anything that can be said on your blog can be said here, and this forum is not an advertising tool for personal blogs. You have a point to make, you make it here like a big boy.

Obviously his intent isn't to win followers to Christ, as he has explicitly stated we and he have no say in the matter. I suspect he simply gets a chubby thinking he's going to heaven and were all going to hell.

It's weird that you would post this speakout, if he's right then YECism is wrong. Are you saying he's right and YECism is wrong?

Also, you quote scripture a lot, how do you know that the bible is the inerrant word of God? How do you know that your particular translation is the right one?

Very well. [B][I] That's my point, if your right, then the only possible purpose of this life is to increase the suffering of those eventually doomed to hell. Even if we have a purpose other then that, it's moot considering at the end, those who God chooses go to heaven and those who God...

During the Kitsmiller v Dover school board trial wherein the parents of several children of a Dover public school sued to prevent a statement about ID being read in science class, all drafts of the lead ID textbook "Of Panda's and People" were subpoenaed. What was found that until 1987, when it...

SoF, if you're interpretation of scripture is correct, why did God give anyone this mortal life? Isn't this life completely redundant if where we wind up afterward is a foregone conclusion? Did God create the mortal life so that those that aren't among his select will suffer that much more when...

So you're saying God decides who gets saved and who doesn't. People are created to either join him in heaven or burn for eternity?

How are those two concepts mutually exclusive? Just because God's sovereign doesn't mean he's right. Every king and queen in the history of the world claimed sovereignty, were each of them automatically right as well?