I am trinitarian. I just want to know how you answer this question.
That's God. There are not three. As he told us, there's only the one.
"I'm a pastor, a husband, and a father. Does this mean there are three men living in the family house? No. It means I am one man in three forms of duty and responsibility and therefore identity. But I am still that one man in all those things I do that are called, pastor, husband, father."
No, it is not.That is a denial of God’s triune nature.
No it isn't but that is an excuse those who aren't familiar with the context of scripture typically throw into these type conversations. Polytheism isn't scriptural and that is exactly what people who argue there are three different 'gods' are doing.At best, this is Modalism which attempts to explain the Trinity simply but denies there are three persons.
Good copy and paste. That's exactly what I said.The best explanation I have found is in Wayne Grudem’s works on Systematic Theology. This clearly sets out three true statements about the nature of God.
1. God is three persons
2. Each person is fully God
3. There is one God
No it isn't but that is an excuse those who aren't familiar with the context of scripture typically throw into these type conversations. Polytheism isn't scriptural and that is exactly what people who argue there are three different 'gods' are doing.
You have multiple beings in your definition with one of them being greater than the others. This is Polytheism.It however contains the Father, the Son, the Holy Spirit, the Angel of God, the Name, Melchizedek and maybe i forget some..
Non the less, it appears the Father is the ultimate GOD
Yet in the beginning was the Word. (John 1)You have multiple beings in your definition with one of them being greater than the others. This is Polytheism.
It was not stated that we could not fathom anything or understand anything about God. Unfathomable was used in the sense of not being able fully comprehend everything. God is infinite but we are finite. We would need infinite knowledge to understanding everything there is to understand about Him. I believe we can fathom some things or understand some things about God. I am very thankful for what I understand about God and I hope I will never stop increasing in my understanding of Him.that does not mean that we can't fathom or understand anything about God
Yes and Jn 1:14 shows that the Word refers to the second Person of the Godhead, God the Son, not a fourth or fifth etc person of the Godhead.Yet in the beginning was the Word. (John 1)
When you define one person of the Godhead as greater than the other persons of the Godhead, you define them as unequal beings. That is not the same as one indivisible being. In the Trinity, each person of the Godhead equals the whole.It's One God none the less.
It would actually show when you writeYes and Jn 1:14 shows
Yes it was about 33 BC. Your point being?It says the Word was made flesh.
This was in around 33 BC.
I was actually wondering what your point was with John 1:14.Yes it was about 33 BC. Your point being?
As stated, there are only three persons in the Godhead. Jn 1:14 shows that the Word in Jn 1:1 is not another person outside of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. God the Son is also called the Word.I was actually wondering what your point was with John 1:14.
Are you referring to an instance where God appears as a person to Abraham or as a burning bush to Moses? God is everywhere and can appear how He likes to whomever He likes. This does mean or prove that every time He shows up it is another person of the Godhead.Yet we see a physical God in the OT as well...
It isn't all that nifty, however. If you posit, as many do, that there are three separate, unique personalities and that their "oneness" is that they all share the same nature, call it divinity of Deity, then you have actually argued there are three Gods, not one. In Norse mythology, Wotan, Brunhilde and Flicka all share divinity, yet there are three gods here. See what I mean?Boy - I am confused by all the follow up.... I did see Modalism in there (the whole Father, Son, Husband thing for sure...since that conception is uniquely mono-personal rather than tri-personal).
If there are three persons - there are three person Gods
If there is one nature - there is one nature God
In other words - the trinity is a nifty hybrid between poly and mono-theism - and it simply depends on which aspect you are referring to in order to answer your question. So I suppose the real answer is - "Both"!
"I'm a pastor, a husband, and a father. Does this mean there are three men living in the family house? No. It means I am one man in three forms of duty and responsibility and therefore identity. But I am still that one man in all those things I do that are called, pastor, husband, father."
That is a denial of God’s triune nature.
At best, this is Modalism which attempts to explain the Trinity simply but denies there are three persons.
The best explanation I have found is in Wayne Grudem’s works on Systematic Theology. This clearly sets out three true statements about the nature of God.
1. God is three persons
2. Each person is fully God
3. There is one God
God is three persons and there is one God. The being of each person is equal to the whole being of God. God is not one person and there are not three God’s.
What appears to be an impossible contradiction to us, is not impossible for God. To simplify it so we can fully comprehend it, diminishes His greatness which is far beyond our own. God is greater than anything we could fully understand or even imagine and I do not understand why people try to shrink God down to something that is less than that. We must simply accept the way God has shown Himself to be. I am so glad that God, even in His very nature, is beyond our full comprehension. The Trinity is just another way in which God is unfathomable and I am so glad He is.