i think this is the first time you mention.
i think wof movements is soft word from prosperity gospel. i.e. they can be use interchangeably.
Actually, I did mention that (a few days ago), and I'll say it again... that there is no such thing as a prosperity gospel in Word-of-faith. My post was removed before you could read it. And, instead of using the word "interchangeably" would you consider the word
attribute in it's place. Check both of these words in Google and you will see the difference.
lure maybe derogatory. how about using word influence ?
Using the word "influence" is much more acceptable. And, how about this... "using the influence
of the Word?" (even better).
in spiritual realm, morality / ethics are irrelevant. Receive CHRIST whatever means is acceptable in spiritual realm.
I'm a little troubled with this one in both areas. Perhaps, you need to clarify this for us. Both of these areas "could" be construed by some as abusing God's Grace (a form of license to sin!) Joseph Prince, along with scores of Grace teachers do not teach this from my readings, so far!
So, in your opinion, does "whatever means" include lying, manipulation, bribing, etc. "to win the lost at any cost" which, ironically is sin? Are there situational circumstances that are not exactly "kosher" and, God may (in those cases) look at motives (hearts), and not necessarily the actions? Christians
illegally smuggling Bibles into China, for instance?
Interesting subjects de, to consider.