It has nothing to do with fruit, it has to do with the reality of those discussions here. You've been around long enough you should know that. As your inappropriate "braggart" comment only confirms.
You were the one who bragged about how much you bring to insulting people. I only called you out on it. Man up and admit it.
Congratulations gentlemen.
We were successfully (IMO) refuting the false teaching of Zachary and EmSw.
Many of the very people who were so successfully refuting the premise of the OP have managed to derail their success by starting a food fight among themselves concerning limited atonement and election.
It is doubtful that we can ever successfully return to refuting the dangerous works oriented doctrine espoused in the OP.
Again, congratulations to those who believe in eternal security and the sufficiency of Christ's finished work for shooting yourselves in the foot.
Charis
Unconditional Election is a Calvinist doctrine. One of the 5 pillars. To quote another person who pretty much summed it up in one sentence "Unconditional Election is the belief that God, with no regard to the will of man, made an eternal choice of certain persons unto eternal life and some to eternal damnation and that number is so fixed that it cannot be changed."
This sort of "election" removes free will, negates the idea of even needing the Bible for anything and is a mockery of Christ and the actions God has taken.
Reformation doctrine is rooted in this but toned down and adjusted so it does not make such an outright lie of the Bible. It reminds of how people want to get their ears tickled.
But the reformed doctrines as well have problems. The idea of unconditional election fails on a logical conclusion on top of Biblical conclusion. In the Reformed world the unconditional election means that God does not foresee an action or condition on our part that induces Him to save us. Rather, election rests on God's soveriegn decision to save whomever He is pleased to save.
The unconditional part obviously only apply to what we can do...because being pleasing to God in order to be saved is a condition.
There is the doctrine of Conditional Election that relies on the idea of only God's soverignty. That God has seen through the ages of who would or would not accept savlation and has elected them to be saved. Here God dispenses his electing grace on the basis of the condition of the human accepting salvation.
No matter how you slice it. The Bible teaches often to go to the sinners and spread the Word. It does not say to go to the elect. The Bible does say that God is not the author of confusion. So by reformed doctrine, a sinner in the Bible could be one of two people...an elect who does not know it yet, or a sinner who is going to hell no matter what happens.
Now based on the doctrine of election even if someone has faith they will not be saved, unless they are the elect. So it is entirely possible and very likely that people will have faith but are not elected and thus be in eternal damnation.
Hebrews 11:1 lets us know what faith is
Faith is the ASSURANCE of things hoped for, the CONVICTION of things not seen.
And we are given the great examples of faith.
By faith Abel offered to God a better sacrifice...
By faith Noah..in reverence prepared an ark...
By faith Abraham...obeyed by going tout...
Time and time again we see faith as the reason for the action. And we see that faith is ASSURANCE of things hoped for...what is the things hoped for? it is the promise of eternal life that is spoken of time and time again.
The idea that a person can have faith but is not elect, and that God would not uphold His promise of eternal salvation as outlined in the Bible repeatedly. Makes God out to be a liar. And is not any god that man should follow.
And if your response is that the person would be one of the elect...how would you know? How would anyone know since the Bible does not say you have not only have faith, but be elect? And if there is no choice in being elected and thus saved, then there is no free will which again is not a Biblical teaching.
There is a reason that the Bible speaks volumes of Jesus coming to the sinners...and not the "elect"...and that is because there is no elect as it is taught in the reformed doctrines. They have misunderstood the Scripture and built a salvation doctrine around it that is outside of the clear text of the Bible. Salvation doctrines are the worst that there can be, just like the works based doctrines of salvation. Because they lead people away and present an image of God that is simply not existant in the Bible.
For God so loved the world...not just the select few. I would pray that you come to understand that it is God's eternal love that He Sacrificed Jesus to pay the sin offering for the entire world. Sinners and saints alike. Jews and gentiles. The penalty of sin is death, and Christ paid that death. God has not changed from the alpha to the omega. To receive God took faith for Abraham, Noah, Moses, and the rest of the Old Testament saints, and it remains the same today for you or for me. You can be secure in your salvation, not because someone said you were elected, but because the Bible says so in 1 John 5:13 "These things I have written to you who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may KNOW that you have eternal life"
If it is not written in the Word...it ain't a doctrine to hold dear too. And sorry my friend, election is not a doctrine that is clearly spelled out in the Bible and it required you claim things not present, contradict clearer verses, and simply make God out to be a liar or one who does not keep His promises.
I am not a Calvinist in the most common sense of the word................... Now based on the doctrine of election even if someone has faith they will not be saved, unless they are the elect. So it is entirely possible and very likely that people will have faith but are not elected and thus be in eternal damnation............................The idea that a person can have faith but is not elect, and that God would not uphold His promise of eternal salvation as outlined in the Bible repeatedly. Makes God out to be a liar. And is not any god that man should follow........................ the Bible does not say you have not only have faith, but be elect? And if there is no choice in being elected and thus saved, then there is no free will which again is not a Biblical teaching.................
Just WHAT is your problem? ... From the OP ...If there are "many", it shouldn't be too difficult for you to cut and paste a few of them for us.
The problem is, none of those verses say what you think they say. I think that's why we keep asking you to post one or two with an explanation as to why you think they support your position.Just WHAT is your problem? ... From the OP ...
Warnings about LOSING eternal LIFE
• Not enduring in the faith (remaining faithful) until death …
Rom 11:20-22, 1 Cor 15:1-2, 2 Cor 13:5, 1 Tim 4:16,
Heb 2:1-4, Heb 3:6, Heb 3:12-14, Heb 10:36-39, 1 Pet 1:5-9,
and Rev 2:10-11 (the crown of life refers to eternal life: 1 Cor 9:24-27, 1 Pet 5:1-4)
Interesting. Not even one of these verses SAYS that one can lose eternal life.The many warnings in the 4 gospels were written to everyone, while ALL of the warnings in the 21 epistles (letters) were written to the churches. In Revelation, some warnings were to everyone while some were to the churches. Let us focus only on the warnings to the churches … and many of them clearly warn against the loss of salvation! Those who argue against
these clear warnings are actually claiming that God is a liar, or a deceiver, or a bluffer.
Sorry, there is not enough space to quote the verses, so please look them up for yourself.
Warnings about LOSING eternal LIFE
• Not enduring in the faith (remaining faithful) until death …
Rom 11:20-22, 1 Cor 15:1-2, 2 Cor 13:5, 1 Tim 4:16, Heb 2:1-4, Heb 3:6, Heb 3:12-14, Heb 10:36-39, 1 Pet 1:5-9, and Rev 2:10-11 (the crown of life refers to eternal life: 1 Cor 9:24-27, 1 Pet 5:1-4)
• Other reasons ...
Gal 5:1-4, Col 3:5-6, 1 Tim 6:9-10, Heb 6:4-8, Heb 10:26-31, 2 Pet 2:20-22, 1 John 3:15
Warnings about GAINING eternal DEATH
Rom 2:5-11, Rom 6:16 & 23, Rom 8:5-6, Rom 8:13-14, Gal 6:7-8, James 1:14-16, Rev 2:11
I apologize for sneaking in 2 of my favorites, which apply to absolutely everyone ...
• being an unrepentant sinner (Rev 21:8) • taking the mark of the beast (Rev 14:9-11)
Warnings about not being allowed to inherit (and enter) the kingdom of God
1 Cor 6:9-10, Gal 5:19-21, Eph 5:3-6, 2 Pet 1:10-11
These passages are warning about believers not going to heaven
(for proof see the NOTE below).
Warnings about not being listed in the Lamb’s Book of Life
Rev 3:5 (and note Rev 20:15, Rev 21:27)
Warnings about not being allowed to enter the city of New Jerusalem
Rev 21:27 (and note Rev 3:12)
Warnings about Old Testament examples which apply to Christians
Rom 11:20-22, 1 Cor 10:1-12, Heb 3:16-19, Heb 4:2-6, Heb 12:16-17, Jude 5-7
Warnings about the necessity of obedience
Rom 6:16, Col 3:5-6, Heb 3:18-19, Heb 5:9, 1 John 2:3-5, 1 John 3:24, Rev 14:12,
Rev 22:14
Warnings about the necessity of being sanctified unto holiness
Rom 12:1-2, 2 Cor 7:1, Eph 1:4, Eph 5:26-27, Col 1:22-23, 2 Thes 2:13-14, Heb 12:14-17,
1 Pet 1:15-16
Warnings about the necessity of maintaining righteousness
Zach and Liz did this (see Luke 1:6) w/o having the new nature and the precious Holy Spirit, so you really have absolutely NO excuse for not overcoming, if you have been given them!
Acts 10:35, Rom 2:5-11, Rom 6:16, 1 Cor 6:9-10, 1 Tim 6:11,1 John 2:29, 1 John 3:7, especially 1 John 3:10
Warnings about the necessity of sincere repentance
2 Cor 7:10, 1 John 1:7-9, Rev 2:5, Rev 2:16
Warnings about the necessity of being an overcomer (overcoming sin, etc.)
Rev 2:7, Rev 2:11, Rev 2:17, Rev 2:26, Rev 3:5, Rev 3:12, especially Rev 3:21
These warnings were written to churches who already believe that Jesus is the Son of God.
An overcomer is one who has been led by the Holy Spirit through the long process of sanctification unto holiness … where sin has been overcome through repentance,
and where the born-again believer has remained steadfast in his/her faith until death.
This also includes overcoming Satan and the world, all of which Jesus did (Rev 3:21).
NOTE
• “And if your eye causes you to sin, pluck it out. It is better for you to enter the kingdom
of God with one eye, rather than having two eyes, to be cast into hell fire” (Mark 9:47)
The above shows: to enter the kingdom of God is the opposite of being cast into hell.
• “Come, you blessed of My Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world … inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me. And these (unrighteous) will go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into eternal life.” (Matt 25:34-46)
The above shows: to inherit the kingdom of God is for the righteous who gain eternal life.
• Therefore, to inherit (enter) the kingdom of God is the same as to gain eternal life!
Please, ignore the word of God at your peril.
Ah... I don't know how to resolve this debate for each of us speaks from a different perspective. Let's see...
1. Can someone who has professed to believe in Jesus Christ be lost?
2. Can someone who has preached Christ, and led others to faith be lost?
3. Can someone who has confessed, been baptized, and lived an exemplary life of faith be lost?
4. Can you emphatically deny Christ and still be saved because you once confessed him and professed the doctrines of OSAS?
The point is, if one who is saved cannot be lost, when and how do we know anyone is saved? What must I do to be saved? While I believe you will confirm that I am saved and cannot be lost. Should I later dispossess Christ and openly deny him you will say I was never saved in the first place. At which point did you lie to me?
Faith must have a practical application or it is of little value to me.
Considering you have not posted any....kinda not something I can do. But please feel free to express your views and support it through the Bible. I would be remiss to say however, that if this needs to be discussed in a different thread then lead the way. This thread is about salvation lost. And while I have been just as guilty about hijacking this thread I try and reign myself in at times to correct for that. Your call however.
Regarding John 3:16, here is another text which says nothing of God's desire to save everyone... are you familiar with the ἵνα clause? In the English it's generally translated that, in order that, so that. Again, you cannot split up the text:
In this way God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son
Why?
So that all the ones believing (πᾶς ὁ πιστεύων) in Him should not perish but have eternal life.
God loved the world in that He sent His Son to save those who believe in Him. What does this have to do with the unbeliever? How did this equate to, as you say, "not just the people he saved, but everyone in it?"
Okay, I'll bite ... take your favorite one (from the list)The problem is, none of those verses say what you think they say. I think that's why we keep asking you to post one or two with an explanation as to why you think they support your position.