This thread and six more that I think will follow is for those who believe that Genesis 4 and 5 describe real people. I would like to hear what you think we can reasonably infer about what the antediluvian world was like -- addressing the questions of when?, who?, what?, how?, where?, and why?. If you don't have an answer yourself, but are aware of someone or some organization that does, I would appreciate a reference. The main topics I am interested in are as follows:
1. History and chronology generally (Ex: Was the first man created at 4004 BC?)
2. Individuals and relationships (Ex: Were Noah and Tubal-Cain related?)
3. Social structures (Ex: Was Enoch a king and/or prophet?)
4. Flora and Fauna (Ex: Did humans really walk with dinosaurs?)
5. Technology (Ex: What about the Great Pyramid?)
6. Geography (Ex: Was there an above ground ocean then?)
7. Religion and existential issues (Ex: Did the ancients look at God and time like we do?)
So for this thread on history and chronology (to answer when?), I would like to put forth the following hypotheses and questions:
1. Creation date: I lean towards using the Septuagint, which gives a creation date of about 5500 BC, rather than the Masoretic text of about 4000 BC. Three main reasons -- The Septuagint gives an earlier Noah's flood date than the Masoretic's 2350 BC, which is hard to support archaeologically; the Septuagint allows more time between and flood and the Tower of Babel; and The Septuagint was what the early church used (and the Greek and Russian Orthodox still do) What do you think and why?
2. Noah's flood date: Between 3000 and 3300 BC -- I would like the flood to coincide with the start of Sumerian civilization around 4000 BC. This may be possible by jiggering with carbon dating and redoing standard Egyptian and other chronologies, something along the line of what Velikovsky wrote about. If Sumerian chronology stays as it is, and the flood is not allowed to be before 3300 BC, we have a problem of reconciling the flood to existing Sumerian archaeological findings. Any thoughts on this?
3. Antediluvian history: Between creation and the flood, the Bible doesn't say much. But there is the Book of Enoch (accepted by the early church and still canonical with the Ethiopean church), the Book of Jubilees, legends of the Jews and histories/mythologies from the Egyptians, Sumerians, Greeks, Indians, Chinese, and Mayans, to name a few. Some Canaanite mythology is actually imbedded in the Bible.
I am inclined to think that the Nephilim might be equivalent to the Greek Titans. The Jesuits identified one of the ancient Chinese with Enoch. Certain lists of ancient Indians and Sumerians have been identified with the antediluvian patriarchs. What do you think of trying to look at ancient non-canonical works to see if they can help flesh out antediluvian history? Is there a better way?
1. History and chronology generally (Ex: Was the first man created at 4004 BC?)
2. Individuals and relationships (Ex: Were Noah and Tubal-Cain related?)
3. Social structures (Ex: Was Enoch a king and/or prophet?)
4. Flora and Fauna (Ex: Did humans really walk with dinosaurs?)
5. Technology (Ex: What about the Great Pyramid?)
6. Geography (Ex: Was there an above ground ocean then?)
7. Religion and existential issues (Ex: Did the ancients look at God and time like we do?)
So for this thread on history and chronology (to answer when?), I would like to put forth the following hypotheses and questions:
1. Creation date: I lean towards using the Septuagint, which gives a creation date of about 5500 BC, rather than the Masoretic text of about 4000 BC. Three main reasons -- The Septuagint gives an earlier Noah's flood date than the Masoretic's 2350 BC, which is hard to support archaeologically; the Septuagint allows more time between and flood and the Tower of Babel; and The Septuagint was what the early church used (and the Greek and Russian Orthodox still do) What do you think and why?
2. Noah's flood date: Between 3000 and 3300 BC -- I would like the flood to coincide with the start of Sumerian civilization around 4000 BC. This may be possible by jiggering with carbon dating and redoing standard Egyptian and other chronologies, something along the line of what Velikovsky wrote about. If Sumerian chronology stays as it is, and the flood is not allowed to be before 3300 BC, we have a problem of reconciling the flood to existing Sumerian archaeological findings. Any thoughts on this?
3. Antediluvian history: Between creation and the flood, the Bible doesn't say much. But there is the Book of Enoch (accepted by the early church and still canonical with the Ethiopean church), the Book of Jubilees, legends of the Jews and histories/mythologies from the Egyptians, Sumerians, Greeks, Indians, Chinese, and Mayans, to name a few. Some Canaanite mythology is actually imbedded in the Bible.
I am inclined to think that the Nephilim might be equivalent to the Greek Titans. The Jesuits identified one of the ancient Chinese with Enoch. Certain lists of ancient Indians and Sumerians have been identified with the antediluvian patriarchs. What do you think of trying to look at ancient non-canonical works to see if they can help flesh out antediluvian history? Is there a better way?