To claim that was gods work or remotely intelligent is, in my opinion, ignoring the obvious.
Not if you consider that part of life that we dont see. There is a spiritual realm, death is not the end necessarily. So what if things in creation die? When the season changes then the plants die but their seed remains, and they are born again in the spring. So it is with life on earth. We must die before we can be born again. To die is not the end necessarily. All of creation speaks a mystery concerning God and us. If we use our limited perspective then we will not see the big picture.
In my opinion, evolution and many sciences are looking at the world as if it were flat. Sure, from ones limited perspective the world does appear to be flat, but once viewed from atop the highest mountain then you can start to see the curvature of the earth, and when seen from orbit we can clearly see that its round, not flat. However even that is not a complete picture when we consider that the earth has a moon which plays a vital role in the earths survival. The moon seems to act like a counter weight, it seems to to be at the correct distance to block many meteorite impacts, and possibly even some solar flares energy. I believe that all science sometimes views things as if the world were flat. It sometimes thinks that it knows what its looking at but the complexities of time and space and all creation itself is much too vast to actually see a complete picture. Much of science is an incomplete picture. Just like when a plant drops its seed and then dies, and is born again, so it is with us. Only we are born again into an eternal spiritual body, not a temporary natural one.
If science proves that we are not intelligent, then science is declaring that science itself is also not intelligent. Why would you trust it then?
Last edited:
Upvote
0