Those who have posted about their observations of the text, are all valid observations. Some I didn't even consider before. Thank you for sharing. If you have more observations, please share!
For now I will share my conclusions based on the observations I posted, and what you have all posted:
The Torah begins with a Bet for many many different reasons. It is from this, we discover that the Torah itself is multidimensional. It is meant to be looked at it many different ways. And the way we discover the answers is by asking the obvious questions depending on our perspective.
To alleviate any concern that just anything can be drawn from any direction in the Torah, the Bet itself is closed on one side to show that although one side is open and much comes out, the other side is closed, indicating there is a limit to what can be drawn. This then sets up the logic that the Torah will immediately get into next, and that is the rules of its own interpretation.
From this we discover the Torah is like a self extracting archive of information. For those familiar with computer terminology, this makes a lot of sense. For those without computer terminology background, this simply means that G-d, in his wisdom, and in the very nature of the Torah itself, has given us a gift of divine origin that explains itself. In fact, the Torah is literally saying that what it says needs no explanation outside of it. Logically speaking, its inherently circular. What then can certify the circular system? Something outside it. As we learn later in reading the Torah, it is G-d (not some angel) who certifies the authenticity of the Torah by the miracles witnessed by an entire nation of millions of people. But this conclusion is a bit too far out of our study at this point.
What is for certain at this point, is that the Bet, being the second letter of the aleph bet, has a value of 2. Not 1. This indicates not only continuity (but not a loop, since the Bet is certainly closed on one side) with that which was before, but also that there is something of a value of 2 we should be further inquiring about. What then is seen? A top bar and a bottom bar. As we read in the rest of the verse, we read of the topic: heaven and earth. The Torah then, per the Bet, shows that it literally is the connection between Heaven and Earth.
The numerical value of 2 also teaches that there are two of something. And perhaps multiple twos of somethings to be looking for. It's like a clue, no rather a key, to unlocking the next steps in this amazing process of discovery.
For starters, it's two of itself... two Torahs. After all, those familiar with Hebrew, immediately know that the Torah is not written, aka, not given, with vowels. How does one pronounce the Bet which forms the first syllable in the Torah? Knowing how to pronounce the words, requires knowledge of well.. a Torah that is vocalized. An oral Torah. But because the vowels, or nikkud as they are called, are not in the original text, the Torah is teaching us that we are given permission (within the limits of its rules for interpretation) to explore its facets both with and without vowels (aka using different vowels which can change a "man" to a "moon" for example in English, but we're only talking Hebrew here) to understand what is being taught.
The Bet being a numerical value of two, and immediately showing us by its two lines that it is connecting a top and a bottom, the Torah teaches us that we can understand other facets through numerical values. Rather interesting. But logically speaking we could only arrive at the above by the following process:
1. seeing the literal Bet and asking questions of it, of its structure, place, importance, etc.
2. seeing the Bet in its context, ie compared to other letters of Bet, this one is larger, others are smaller (such as in the next word)
3. Asking what the Bet could also represent - a house, a container, a symbol of heaven connected to earth, a start, a beginning
4. And finally understanding that the above can also be proven (the duality of heaven and earth, and of the Bet's written and oral component) through its numerical value.
These four methods we simply discover by the first, going on through all the rest until you come to the fourth.
Interestingly enough, the Rabbis term this process of discovery and study as PaRDeS - peshat, remez, drash, and sod. The literal, the hint, the allegorical or homiletical, and the secret gematrial/number - each later one dependent aka limited on the discoveries of the former or those before it. Logically presented by the Bet, and in the next four words of the verse, we learn these foundational rules of Torah study. And with the Bet closed on one side teaching us there is a limit to what is drawn, we are prompted to fit the clues to find out what the pattern shows us in the limit to these rules.
And we find:
Conclusions based on numerical values, can not exceed what can be limited by drashic, or homiltetical conclusions, or limited by remez or hinted conclusions, or peshat or literal conclusions.
In short, nothing in Torah loses its peshat, or literal value, or else the entire system of logic leading to a conclusion becomes removed from its support, and any conclusions drawn from such a baseless argument, is therefore identified as being false. The limit. The Bet with the side closed on one end. Which is why the sod or numerical value of Bet, becomes the first literal conclusion read from the text, and is stopped on the one side of Bet that is closed. It's like discovering the rules of interpretation, PaRDeS in reverse, to show that there is a limit in the most expansive of all the rules: sod. Going on from here, we are snapped back into peshat, the literal reading of the text in order to start asking more questions, and it is in peshat therefore that we being led to start finding the answers to our questions (as opposed to our own imaginations). It's rather kind of humbling. As if we're being guided (and warned) by the text itself in how to read it. And we are.
As we have only discovered this by looking at the Hebrew of the text, it also goes without saying that one should learn Hebrew to understand it.
I should also mention that the remez of the first and second Bet teaches us to look for other connections later in the Torah so as to fully understand any part of it. It is by the Spirit of G-d that you are able to find such connections but again this is another later conclusion.
I will write more after the Shabbat. Shabbat shalom.