BryanW92
Hey look, it's a squirrel!
- May 11, 2012
- 3,571
- 757
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
So, you believe all of the Bible to be taken literally and is literally true?, and is not meant to be interpreted in any other sort of way (other than literal)? When we are trying to operate in the Spirit, and are to interpret and discern things spiritually; are we interpreting literally?, or operating in some other sort of way, another kind of truth?
I don't know what what you mean by humanists? I don't know what a humanist is?
I found this: "
I'm a "student of humanity or the humanities" but I don't downplay the importance of God, I magnify it/him...
- In the Renaissance, a scholar who studied the languages and cultures of ancient Greece and Rome; today, a scholar of the humanities. The term secular humanist is applied to someone who concentrates on human activities and possibilities, usually downplaying or denying the importance of God and a life after death.
God Bless!
I don't give much thought to the literal interpretation of the Old Testament. It is what it is, but was scribed by inspired men who lived in the Bronze Age.
Do I take the New Testament literally? Yes, I do. I take the words of Jesus seriously, but in context. I take the words of the Epistles seriously, but in the context in which they were written and in the context of who they were written to. The Spirit helps me to interpret by making me aware of context, not by giving me new revelation of what scripture means. Discernment is about understanding, not about new revelation. There is no new revelation. That would be adding to scripture.
When I speak of humanists, I am talking about the modern secular humanist, not the Renaissance scholar. The definition of secular humanist that you provided is a good one. We can find them inside and outside of the church these days.
Upvote
0