nick garai
Senior Member
If the minimum wage goes up, and I am all for it here in British Columbia, then the cost of living will also go up. Everything else will get more expensive.
Upvote
0
Does Canada have inflation? If so then everything is already going up and keeping the minimum wage rate at a low level only further impoverishes those who earn it.If the minimum wage goes up, and I am all for it here in British Columbia, then the cost of living will also go up. Everything else will get more expensive.
They do resent that, although these rich people pay the vast majority of the income taxes while the poor pay none of it and instead get money sent to them. But we also know that many, many people simply think that if the rich have more than they do, most of it should be distributed to everyone else.
Morally right that the rich give ON THEIR OWN. That's quite a different matter from the government confiscating it and giving it out to other people.
It seems to me like a lot of people resent the poor getting help!
Well, there you have it. Some people resent the poor getting help (although I've never met anyone who actually does; mostly, the critics are complaining about people who could help themselves but prefer to live off of the government welfare system instead)...and then some other people think that if another person is richer, the first one has some human right to take it.
I know it's a entirely different issue those that can work and can't! But I have heard many complaints from those that don't want help for anyone. I will give you just one example since so many seniors that have paid in and have worked their life for what they have. While I don't remember which Republican said it he made it clear he wanted to do away with medicare. His made it clear he would stop talking about medicare "when there is no medicare" and it's not someone in the news media that said it but that came from the Republican himself. I heard him say it! I have heard others say similar comments. Wanting to cut the pitiful COLA that is already pitifully low and went 2 years with none and yet many on both sides were ready to cut it. All you have to do is listen to know it's not just those that can work and don't that they do not want any help for.
Well, I see that we've now boiled this supposedly widespread problem down to a single unnamed Republican. That may be emblematic of why I'm somewhat skeptical of such generalizations. In addition, wanting changes in any federal program--and they are all a mess, if truth be told--is not the same as wanting to deprive the current beneficiaries of all assistance.
Well, as usual SEEMS someone wants to try to take out of context what I was pointing out as i plainly said I was giving only one example and plainly also wrote "I have heard others say similar comments" but SEEMS to me you took it as I am going by only one Republican.
Just a minute. If you don't present us with any reason to think your opinion about what people think of the poor is based upon more than what you gave us, the objective reader can only conclude what I did.
Here's the thing. ANYONE with their eyes open, and their hearts open, and really wants to speak out about something wrong regardless of which party it is because there is a lot wrong in both parties, they will see, they will hear what I am talking about.
Sure, some people will draw conclusions with only what is written but anyone that really wants help for those in this world that can't help their self, really help for the poor that is unable to work, OR that is working but don't make enough money to take care of basic necessities they can learn the same information I have.
Sounds exactly like that generalization stuff that you were upset with me for mentioning before.
Perhaps the slip-up in your thinking is that you have given all the blame for a ruined economy to there not being enough welfare (and/or to "some" people who don't agree with you about the matter), when it's really the policies of the administration that have kept people unemployed or underemployed for so long.
but rather you stated regarding my thinking is that "you have given all the blame for a ruined economy to there not being enough welfare (and/or to "some" people who don't agree with you about the matter), when it's really the policies of the administration that have kept people unemployed or underemployed for so long." when I said nothing about any policies regarding the unemployed"
Perhaps you just read that too fast. I didn't say that you had commented on the bolded part. On the contrary, I suggested that you perhaps SHOULD HAVE done so, since this is more to blame for the lack of jobs and a lowered standard of living than what you actually were pointing at.
I presume that you also receive incentive payments for each item you sell and wouldn't that raise your weekly pay above $600/week?I have had months of training, product knowledge, seniority with the company and sales experience to be in the position I am in. I am paid $14 an hour right now. It would blow me up to be less than level with someone at McDonald's. I started at $9.50/hour and in 2 years managed to get a lot more by position swapping. $15 would cause a HUGE problem for the middle class.
I presume that you also receive incentive payments for each item you sell and wouldn't that raise your weekly pay above $600/week?
Your post's argument appears to be one of comparison - the poor do not deserve $15/hour if I started at $9.50/hour and had to work my way up to a retainer of $14/hour! How dare they get as much or more than I do for my retainer! It's an outrage! Of course arguments like that are far from valid as a reason to keep the poor in their poverty.
Do you live in Los Angeles?There is a difference between being poor and being in poverty. Sadly, America does not see this as true. They claim someone making $25K a year to be in poverty which blows me away. I live on my own in a very nice condo, have a $280 car payment, afford groceries just fine, shopping here and there and so on with around $28K a year. I do NOT get commission sadly. I do not feel poor, I feel quite well off to be honest. I just don't believe in high pay for under skilled people. The company I work for used to pay my position $22 an hour until the market collapse of 2008. A lot of companies did for that matter. It would be sad if everyone started getting more for less although it sounds nice. It would not do any good for motivated people, leaving more to strive for less and the end result? More reliability on the government which is something I am heavily against. Just my views on it all. Not mad at anyone except the government themselves.
Do you live in Los Angeles?