I wonder if Hinkle opted to dismiss the case anyway (but throw in a little jab at DeSantis) because he knows that there's a good chance the 11th circuit court of appeals may have overturned a ruling had he opted to try to rule to reinstate Warren.
(it wouldn't be the first time Hinkle had a ruling overturned by the 11th circuit court of appeals)
Hinkle choice words do seem a bit odd.
Robert Hinkle ruled the 11th Amendment prevents him from reversing the suspension.
floridapolitics.com
From the bench he said:
“Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspended elected State Attorney Andrew Warren, ostensibly on the ground that Mr. Warren had blanket policies not to prosecute certain kinds of cases. The allegation was false,” the ruling opens.
“Mr. Warren’s well established policy, followed in every case by every prosecutor in the office, was to exercise prosecutorial discretion at every stage of every case. Any reasonable investigation would have confirmed this.”
However, a quick look at what Warren's actions actually were:
The State Attorney in Hillsborough County, Andrew Warren, has pledged not to press charges against those receiving an abortion or their doctors. This comes in the wake of Roe v. Wade being overturned by the Supreme Court, handing the power down to the states on how to handle abortion laws.
www.fox13news.com
"pledging he would not prosecute cases stemming from
Florida’s 15-week abortion ban and potential bans on gender-affirming care."
While the judge states "it's not a blanket policy to not prosecute certain kinds of cases, it was just about exercising prosecutorial discretion at every stage at every case", the facts seem to not necessarily line up with that. And given Hinkle's list of rulings on various things (both in his current position, and in past years), I don't think he's necessarily "unbiased", and tends to dip his toes into the waters of "judicial activism" much like Clearance Thomas does for the other side.