Prosecutor suspended by DeSantis testifies as lawsuit begins: ‘It is important for me to speak out’

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,945
4,352
Pacific NW
✟248,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
I think that if a prosecutor announces in advance that he's not going to do his job in certain cases, the governor has every right to suspend him. It's not a freedom of speech issue, it's a job performance issue. I respect the prosecutor's principles, but it's his duty to follow the law.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ThatRobGuy
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,782
14,646
Here
✟1,214,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think that if a prosecutor announces in advance that he's not going to do his job in certain cases, the governor has every right to suspend him. It's not a freedom of speech issue, it's a job performance issue. I respect the prosecutor's principles, but it's his duty to follow the law.

Correct, and if a person with a law degree is a "principle over policy" type of person, they'd be better suited to be a defense attorney and not a prosecutor. And I don't mean that in a snarky way, I'm serious... If a person with Warren's principles is in a state that's just threatened to criminalize certain abortions, he could make a fine living at the other courtroom table helping people who are getting prosecuted for it if he feels that strongly about it.

Look at Johnny Cochran, he was a DA...when he decided that the laws didn't line up with his own perceived vision of what justice should look like, he changed teams and went into private practice as a defense attorney and was quite successful at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Yttrium
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
17,062
10,714
Earth
✟148,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
I think that if a prosecutor announces in advance that he's not going to do his job in certain cases, the governor has every right to suspend him. It's not a freedom of speech issue, it's a job performance issue. I respect the prosecutor's principles, but it's his duty to follow the law.
I would argue that DeSantis jumped the gun…he should have waited for a case that the prosecutor failed to prosecute, then pounce.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,945
4,352
Pacific NW
✟248,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
How about for double homicides which include an unborn child?
Those are called out as specific exceptions in some states. If born and unborn babies weren't treated differently, those exceptions wouldn't be there.
 
Upvote 0

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,945
4,352
Pacific NW
✟248,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
I would argue that DeSantis jumped the gun…he should have waited for a case that the prosecutor failed to prosecute, then pounce.
True. DeSantis jumped the gun, weakening his position. Still, I think he had (barely) enough of an excuse to suspend Warren.
 
Upvote 0

HARK!

שמע
Christian Forums Staff
Supervisor
Site Supporter
Oct 29, 2017
55,794
8,199
US
✟1,110,077.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Private
Those are called out as specific exceptions in some states. If born and unborn babies weren't treated differently, those exceptions wouldn't be there.
You're looking at it all wrong. The exceptions for killing babies come out of the convenience for mothers who don't want to take responsibility for caring for their children.

If the father killed the child; he would go to prison.
 
Upvote 0

Yttrium

Independent Centrist
May 19, 2019
3,945
4,352
Pacific NW
✟248,373.00
Country
United States
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
You're looking at it all wrong. The exceptions for killing babies come out of the convenience for mothers who don't want to take responsibility for caring for their children.

If the father killed the child; he would go to prison.
...

What?

You're trying so hard to use loaded language that it's coming out as gibberish.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,621
36,940
Los Angeles Area
✟836,957.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Today in Florida News:

DeSantis violated state law and the Florida Constitution, but Warren can’t be reinstated, judge rules

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — A federal judge announced a long-awaited decision on whether Hillsborough State Attorney Andrew Warren should be restored to office, ruling Friday that the ousted prosecutor cannot be reinstated, even though Gov. Ron DeSantis violated state law when he suspended him last year.

“It is not surprising that in this litigation, the Governor has not acknowledged that [politics] was a factor in the suspension. But it plainly was,” the judge wrote.

“The suspension also violated the Florida Constitution, and that violation did affect the outcome,” Hinkle wrote. “But the Eleventh Amendment prohibits a federal court from awarding declaratory or injunctive relief of the kind at issue against a state official based only on a violation of state law.”


States Rights!

"Today’s decision has laid the groundwork for a state court to reinstate Warren and conclude that DeSantis abused his power and violated the Constitution.”
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,782
14,646
Here
✟1,214,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Today in Florida News:

DeSantis violated state law and the Florida Constitution, but Warren can’t be reinstated, judge rules

TAMPA, Fla. (WFLA) — A federal judge announced a long-awaited decision on whether Hillsborough State Attorney Andrew Warren should be restored to office, ruling Friday that the ousted prosecutor cannot be reinstated, even though Gov. Ron DeSantis violated state law when he suspended him last year.

“It is not surprising that in this litigation, the Governor has not acknowledged that [politics] was a factor in the suspension. But it plainly was,” the judge wrote.

“The suspension also violated the Florida Constitution, and that violation did affect the outcome,” Hinkle wrote. “But the Eleventh Amendment prohibits a federal court from awarding declaratory or injunctive relief of the kind at issue against a state official based only on a violation of state law.”


States Rights!

"Today’s decision has laid the groundwork for a state court to reinstate Warren and conclude that DeSantis abused his power and violated the Constitution.”

I wonder if Hinkle opted to dismiss the case anyway (but throw in a little jab at DeSantis) because he knows that there's a good chance the 11th circuit court of appeals may have overturned a ruling had he opted to try to rule to reinstate Warren.
(it wouldn't be the first time Hinkle had a ruling overturned by the 11th circuit court of appeals)

Hinkle choice words do seem a bit odd.

From the bench he said:
“Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspended elected State Attorney Andrew Warren, ostensibly on the ground that Mr. Warren had blanket policies not to prosecute certain kinds of cases. The allegation was false,” the ruling opens.

“Mr. Warren’s well established policy, followed in every case by every prosecutor in the office, was to exercise prosecutorial discretion at every stage of every case. Any reasonable investigation would have confirmed this.”



However, a quick look at what Warren's actions actually were:


"pledging he would not prosecute cases stemming from Florida’s 15-week abortion ban and potential bans on gender-affirming care."


While the judge states "it's not a blanket policy to not prosecute certain kinds of cases, it was just about exercising prosecutorial discretion at every stage at every case", the facts seem to not necessarily line up with that. And given Hinkle's list of rulings on various things (both in his current position, and in past years), I don't think he's necessarily "unbiased", and tends to dip his toes into the waters of "judicial activism" much like Clearance Thomas does for the other side.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
6,962
7,561
PA
✟323,703.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
I wonder if Hinkle opted to dismiss the case anyway (but throw in a little jab at DeSantis) because he knows that there's a good chance the 11th circuit court of appeals may have overturned a ruling had he opted to try to rule to reinstate Warren.
(it wouldn't be the first time Hinkle had a ruling overturned by the 11th circuit court of appeals)

Hinkle choice words do seem a bit odd.

From the bench he said:
“Florida Governor Ron DeSantis suspended elected State Attorney Andrew Warren, ostensibly on the ground that Mr. Warren had blanket policies not to prosecute certain kinds of cases. The allegation was false,” the ruling opens.

“Mr. Warren’s well established policy, followed in every case by every prosecutor in the office, was to exercise prosecutorial discretion at every stage of every case. Any reasonable investigation would have confirmed this.”



However, a quick look at what Warren's actions actually were:


"pledging he would not prosecute cases stemming from Florida’s 15-week abortion ban and potential bans on gender-affirming care."


While the judge states "it's not a blanket policy to not prosecute certain kinds of cases, it was just about exercising prosecutorial discretion at every stage at every case", the facts seem to not necessarily line up with that. And given Hinkle's list of rulings on various things (both in his current position, and in past years), I don't think he's necessarily "unbiased", and tends to dip his toes into the waters of "judicial activism" much like Clearance Thomas does for the other side.
What Warren did was sign an open letter pledging not to prosecute certain crimes. That doesn't constitute a blanket policy, as it is not an official directive to his office. And because no such cases had crossed his desk, he had no opportunities to demonstrate a policy via his actions. IMO, DeSantis would only have had grounds to fire him - as an elected official - had he actually demonstrated the alleged blanket policy, or at least officially communicated it to the office.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: wing2000
Upvote 0