Justice Thomas raised crucial question about legitimacy of special counsel's prosecution of Trump

[Postvieww]

Are you suggesting that Cohen not being issued legal writ to keep his fool mouth closed, would be…appealable ?

I am not a lawyer but that doesn’t sound like sound legal reasoning.

One of many reasons to appeal.

 

[Postvieww]

And *did* Cohen actually “attack Trump”?
Or are we supposed to get mad over made up stuff?

Cohen loved Trump, there is no inflation, Biden is a mentally sharp physically fit specimen. The border is not open, world leaders respect and fear Biden. Gaslighting of the American public seems to be a pastime of the left. This could be A very long post but the point has been made. To answer your question, yes we could get mad over made up stuff.

 

[Postvieww]

Take it to the appeals court.

I am sure they will if needed. Still hoping for an honest jury decision.

 

[A2SG]

I am sure they will if needed. Still hoping for an honest jury decision.

Out of curiosity, do you define an "honest" jury decision only as a not guilty verdict? Or do you consider that a guilty verdict can be an honest one?

I guess I'm wondering if your mind is already made up on this subject, or if you're interested in whether or not the evidence complied against Trump is able to convince a jury of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

-- A2SG, personally, I haven't seen all of the evidence, so I can't judge that myself.....

 

[Postvieww]

Out of curiosity, do you define an "honest" jury decision only as a not guilty verdict? Or do you consider that a guilty verdict can be an honest one?

I guess I'm wondering if your mind is already made up on this subject, or if you're interested in whether or not the evidence complied against Trump is able to convince a jury of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

-- A2SG, personally, I haven't seen all of the evidence, so I can't judge that myself.....

Of course my mind is made up. We can pretend this is all just normal justice at work or we can be honest the facts. This judge is corrupt, this is a third world type political hit job and there is no real legit basis for this circus. For anyone not named Trump this fake case would have been laughed out of any legitimate court room. I do not accept the premise anything is just or fair about this whole affair.

 

[A2SG]

Of course my mind is made up.

That's what I figured.

You're not really interested in an "honest" verdict, only the one you've decided on. Without having seen the evidence for yourself.

Thanks.

-- A2SG, must be nice to not have to concern yourself with the actual facts ....

 

[Hans Blaster]

I am sure they will if needed. Still hoping for an honest jury decision.

Trump has appealed over and over in this case and largely fails.

 

[Postvieww]

Trump has appealed over and over in this case and largely fails.

No surprise why would a corrupt judge do anything fair. Just look at the jury instructions. The judge has one goal , convict Trump.

 

[Postvieww]

That's what I figured.

You're not really interested in an "honest" verdict, only the one you've decided on. Without having seen the evidence for yourself.

Thanks.

-- A2SG, must be nice to not have to concern yourself with the actual facts ....

Maybe you should consider actual facts. Normal court procedure. Every legitimate legal scholar sees this for the injustice it really is. Trump haters only see get a conviction, and mask it as fake fairness.

 

[Hans Blaster]

No surprise why would a corrupt judge do anything fair. Just look at the jury instructions. The judge has one goal , convict Trump.

You do know that judges don't handle their own appeals, Right?

 

[A2SG]

Maybe you should consider actual facts.

That'd be difficult, seeing as neither one of us has seen the evidence presented to the jury.

Normal court procedure. Every legitimate legal scholar sees this for the injustice it really is. Trump haters only see get a conviction, and mask it as fake fairness.

I'm more than willing to accept the verdict. If Trump doesn't, he's always entitled to appeal.

-- A2SG, where a different court, with different judges, will review the trial to see if there were procedural or legal errors to be considered.....

 

[7thKeeper]

Maybe you should consider actual facts. Normal court procedure. Every legitimate legal scholar sees this for the injustice it really is. Trump haters only see get a conviction, and mask it as fake fairness.

And by legitimate, you merely mean those who agree with you. For someone who talks about Trump haters, etc., you are almost hilariously unaware of the irony of your own views, having made up your mind and trying to make reality fit the preconceived view.

 

[Postvieww]

And by legitimate, you merely mean those who agree with you. For someone who talks about Trump haters, etc., you are almost hilariously unaware of the irony of your own views, having made up your mind and trying to make reality fit the preconceived view.

I’m am looking through eyes that look for truth. Those that can’t see this for what it really is have been misled. I see nothing hilarious about this situation. In many of the posts the left has ignored facts , legal scholars who don’t need to agree with me, I agree with . Those that don’t see the injustice in this witch hunt are looking for a verdict that agrees with their misguided view of what is justice and constitutional norms are. You can’t impugn the legal analysis of an Alan Dershowitz because I agree with him but do so because he is a liberal who doesn’t agree with you!