The only reason I referred to "God's children" is because I was responding to Nadiine's post which began by analogizing God to a parent who gives birth to a child they know has a serious defect because they love that child anyway:First of all, you are under the false assumption that all of mankind are God's children.
The Word of God says no such thing. By nature, since the fall of Adam, we are
children of wrath before receiving Christ. (See Ephesians 2:3)
I understood Nadiine to be arguing that God loves all of his children, and that's why He allows us to be born even if he knows we'll end up in hell.Would a parent give birth to a child they know has a serious defect? Yes. How about if a child eventually rebels & would estranged from them? sure.
The answer is LOVE here.
And you are also seeming to forget that God Himself created a way that NO ONE
I'm not judging God, nor do I pretend to understand why things are the way the are. I'm interested in the analyses that posters have offered on this forum. As for the "way out" that you refer to, I guess my follow up remark would be that He wouldn't have to construct a "way out" of hell if He didn't permit hell in the first place.would have to face the judgment and could be saved.
Is it His fault that the majority of people choose to be too prideful
(which is the same sin that cause satan to fall from heaven) to receive
His gift, and would rather in their foolishness shake their
puny fingers at and judge God?
Upvote
0