If you're saying that you don't see a problem with it, and see no need for regulation, then do you staunchly oppose Trump's regulatory plan pertaining to protectionism?
People can't have it both ways here...they can't say "it's a great thing that these CEO's are pulling in 8-figure salaries, we should embrace that" while simultaneously saying "Donald should put protectionism laws in place so encourage purchasing American goods".
It was the former that caused the issues that the latter is attempting to address (in a flawed manner I might add).
It was their quest for a ridiculously high salaries & profits that drove them to seek alternatives outside of the US. When making 50x what their employees made just wasn't enough for them anymore, they sought to find new employees outside the country that would do it for much less.
If you pass protectionism laws that all but force them to use American operations instead of foreign ones, and "those pesky minimum wage laws" are what's standing between them and those high salaries they wanted, the first thing they're going to lobby for with their power is to remove that, dismantle unions, and pay American workers the same lousy wage they were paying the foreign workers.
If you're going to try to address greed with legislation (which is what the protectionism laws are attempting here) then it can't be flimsy legislation that just transfers the poor conditions from foreign workers onto domestic ones, it needs to be stern and it needs to codify and strengthen the rights of American workers. Otherwise, in 10 years, we'll just have American workers in a Hanes factory trying to scrape by on wages less than $15k/year.
Gotta pick one or the other...either you embrace 100% free markets and deal with the consequences (outsourcing, destroying environments, low wages, etc...), or you take a hard line and pass legislation that says "
You WILL use American operations for this, You WILL pay them a decent wage, You WILL allow them to unionize, and You WILL provide benefits...if that means you and your executive team only make $5 million next year instead of $10 million...tough luck"
Trying to implement these half-baked solutions just transfer the problem from one place to another.