The reality is that you're attempting to place a very old book, written by men before any standard of research had been developed, against the scientific method which has lead to the same computer technology you're using to refute it. Science is as successful as it is precisely because it forces itself to change when evidence shows that a change is necessary to maintain accuracy. The only reason you're not living in a mud hut, with no concept of the cause of disease while seeing images taken from the surface of Mars, communicating from your home with people all around the world and watching real-time video from half way across the world is because science has corrected itself when corrections were found to be appropriate.
And what you attempt to place as superior to that science is a book which claims that the Earth lies stationary at the center of the universe, formed in a day, was covered with water before it had an atmosphere, grew plants and fruit-bearing trees before the Sun had formed in an environment only 2.7°K above absolute zero, and tells man that wife-beating, slavery and the slaughter of infants is promoted by a caring and loving God.
