How do you know how many people have been harmed by the Wuhan virus vaccines? Are you aware of the huge distortions and cover-ups that are going on concerning the efficacy and harm of the vaccines? It doesn't sound like it. Are you aware that no prior vaccine has ever been allowed to accrue the level of harm that the present vaccines have accrued? Any prior vaccine having even a fraction of the adverse events attributed to the Wuhan virus mRNA vaccines was scrapped as dangerous and ineffective - especially in light of how "leaky" the vaccines are proving to be. And yet, now these highly-dangerous, weak vaccines are being pushed on children who are, statistically-speaking, in comparison to other demographic populations, virtually immune to the virus! Follow the money.
It is also extremely false to suggest that there is some moral imperative, a "selfless reason," for getting the vaccine that obliges good people to take it.
The vaccinated get infected by the virus and infect others. Some, having taken two and three boosters, are still dying from the virus! Vaccination, then, does not "protect others." In fact, it may make the spread of the virus more rapid and concentrated, since many vaccinated people (like you) have a false sense of their immunity to the virus and congregate together, helping viral transmission.
The reality is that only a small segment of the population is dangerously susceptible to the virus. We don't hear this, though, from the talking heads on CNN, or NBC, or wherever. No, all the pop media wants you to hear is that people are dying. Stay afraid! Give up your freedoms! Comply! This is what good people do. But the vast majority of healthy people under 60 have a 99% + recovery rate from the Wuhan virus. Upwards of 50% of people infected with the virus never even know they've been infected! When's the last time you heard a news cycle trumpeting these FACTS concerning the Wuhan virus? Never. Again, follow the money.
Finally, "flattening the curve" in hospitals is largely a political maneuver designed to prompt more vaccination (and more money in the pockets of Big Pharma, politicians and medical authorities), and justify incredible governmental over-reach. Ivermectin, fluvoxamine, monoclonal antibodies, vitamin D and zinc - these and other treatments have been shown repeatedly, in clinical use, to effectively counter the virus and its effects on the body, emptying hospitals of people critically-ill from the virus. The "crisis" in hospitals, then, is mostly contrived, occurring in the midst of known, cheap, readily-available and effective treatments of the virus. There is nowhere near as much money to be made in such treatments, however, and so they are characterized as "dangerous horse medicine," and/or "not established by double-blind, years-long, clinical studies involving thousands of subjects," etc.
And the many thousands now (the number grows daily) who have been permanently damaged by the vaccines? What do you say to those who have become paralyzed, or suffered strokes, or heart attacks, or chronic myocarditis, pericarditis, ADE or who have died? Tough nuts? Too bad, oh well? And what about the far superior effects of natural immunity? Why, when natural immunity is so much better than the weak help the vaccines offer against the virus, should healthy people run the terrible risk of the many extreme adverse effects of the mRNA vaccines? Again, 99%+ of healthy people under 60 will recover from the virus without aid of a vaccine and upwards of 50% of them have been infected already and never even known it. And when this natural recovery has happened, they will have far better resistance to the virus than they would have had from any of the tepid and very dangerous mRNA vaccines that are making billions upon billions of dollars for a select few in the political, medical and pharmaceutical fields.
www.brownstone.org
www.covid19criticalcare.com
www.bird-group.org
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLYOlnsoB5tcLM7TILShPVxixSJJp37sdT
www.pandata.org
www.gbdeclaration.org
www.action4canada.com
It is the height of specious, manipulative rhetoric to invoke Jesus in the matter of vaccination. He died for our sins and to secure our eternal destiny, not to help suppress a mere temporal, physical malady. He died to save us from ourselves and the self-deception and sin under which we can't help but labor as sin-cursed creatures. He did not sacrifice himself under the influence of a false medical narrative, taking a vaccine and dying under the mistaken notion that doing so protected others from a virus.
Christians show themselves to be "sheep" of a very different kind from those of John 10 when they blindly follow the fear-mongering vaccination propaganda flowing constantly from the pop media and Establishment "experts." The Good Shepherd commands his "sheep" to be good Bereans, examining the hard data as much as possible, checking the claims of those who are trying to herd them in a particular direction, to see "whether these things be so" or not. Many Christians, unfortunately, don't do this with their own faith and with those under whose teaching they have placed themselves, but, instead, simply adopt whatever the "expert" tells them to adopt, trusting blindly to the credentials and moral fiber of the "expert," rather than making the effort to study out a matter for themselves. This is a surefire way to come under the power of a false teacher - and under the power of secular experts, captured by avarice and power, who are making merchandise of those who blindly follow their proclamations and advice about dangerous and weak vaccines.
