Simple question.
Why was this Okay, and this is offensive?
Why was this Okay, and this is offensive?
Assuming that Bush Sr, Bill Clinton, Bush Jr, and Obama didn't undo all the "greatness". Perhaps Trump is wanting to return America to "Regan Era Greatness" and not "Jim Crow Era" racism and bigotry?I would think Republicans would reject the notion that we need to make America great again because Reagan had already done so.
So it is not the slogan, its the rhetoric? So why are people so offended when people merely wear a MAGA hat and attack those wearing the hat before any "rhetoric" is given?It's not the slogan, it's the rhetoric that often accompanies it.
Simple question.
Why was this Okay, and this is offensive?
View attachment 249727 View attachment 249728
Because the hat has come to represent a lot more than just the words embroidered into it. It's not just a general statement of wanting to improve the country. It has become a personal statement of identity with a larger group.So it is not the slogan, its the rhetoric? So why are people so offended when people merely wear a MAGA hat and attack those wearing the hat before any "rhetoric" is given?
I cannot watch youtube videos on my computer. Although I appreciate your opinion, just because you believe it to be a "dog whistle" to Jim Crow is there anything to suggest MAGA is not the same message Ronald Regan ran on in 1980?It is what is meant by "again". It is imho a dog whistle to those who would like to see the return to "Jim Crow" era in US history. Listen to Rep. John Lewis.
What is the "personal statement of identity" and from which group? The only people making it a personal statement that I have seen is the "Left" making it a personal statement because of their distain for Trump. I feel like they merely hate Trump and all that he stands for. Because they cannot physically assault the President himself, they must settle for attacking those who support his policies and vision.Because the hat has come to represent a lot more than just the words embroidered into it. It's not just a general statement of wanting to improve the country. It has become a personal statement of identity with a larger group.
How so? Please explain because everyone I know who supported the President regarded "MAGA" as a similar message to the one made by Regan in 1980. The only people who consider it more than that is the less than 1% of Americans who fall in the "Alt-right" group and the "Left". Did it ever cross you mind that people had the same reaction to the Obama administration that people had for the Carter administration?If people legitimately wanted to make America great, that's great.
But MAGA isn't about making America great, it's about being joining an evil cult and ejecting all sense of reason.
-CryptoLutheran
it is the same message. Both men used it to win the their elections.Both men used it for the same purpose. He who has ears to hear.I cannot watch youtube videos on my computer. Although I appreciate your opinion, just because you believe it to be a "dog whistle" to Jim Crow is there anything to suggest MAGA is not the same message Ronald Regan ran on in 1980?
You're not far off. At least for me.What is the "personal statement of identity" and from which group? The only people making it a personal statement that I have seen is the "Left" making it a personal statement because of their distain for Trump. I feel like they merely hate Trump and all that he stands for. Because they cannot physically assault the President himself, they must settle for attacking those who support his policies and vision.
I think that is a fair statement. I think you would agree that attacking someone who is simply wearing a "MAGA" hat is unacceptable. I think it is appropriate to object to the president's vision and policies and to assume that a person wearing a MAGA hat supports those policies you disagree with. I also find it personally acceptable to approach someone wearing a MAGA hat and have a respectful debate over those policies. But to feel "offended" merely because someone is wearing a hat because they "believe" it has some underlying message of racism and hate is in my opinion absurd and childish. What if people started to believe that "Hope and Change" was a subliminal message to "Black Power"? To me, this example is no different than what is happening today with "Make America Great Again".You're not far off. At least for me.
You're right, I don't like Trump, his vision, his tactics in politics and in business or his policies as president. I don't think they are right for the country and I can see my objections being validated over and over again. I saw this coming from well before he was ever taken seriously as a candidate. He was then and continues to be a joke in my eyes except, now the joke is our whole nation. But don't take me for an example of the "Left" in general. I'll admit, there's a sinister part of me that likes him specifically because it is all so ridiculous, I can't help but be entertained by it. He's like a cartoon come to life.
The statement of identity I'm talking about is just that. It is TRUMP. It is people choosing to identify with everything that comes with TRUMP. They want to do it. They want to be part of that group and identify with the other members of the same club. There's nothing unique about this. It's what the right often calls "virtue-signalling" when they see the left do it.
If people were truly just wanting to "make America great again" they'd just do it already and not have to announce it to the world.
It is what is meant by "again". It is imho a dog whistle to those who would like to see the return to "Jim Crow" era in US history. Listen to Rep. John Lewis.
Are you referring to that group of about 200 white supremacist doing that rally somewhere in the Carolinas? Yeah, myself and about 99% of Conservative Trump supporters condemn them too.but after Trump and his MAGA crowds, their signs and t-shirts and the folks marching with tiki torches,