Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Thsi verse says straight out that they perish. Why can't you see this? Why do you deny the very words of the bible?
Well, of course the solution is to get a seeing eye dog. Just think of me as your dog.If one cannot see, they are...?
Don't worry about it, my friend, much of this is general, and I have taken no offense at what has been said...I expect it. Though I will have great joy when discussion can focus on the exegesis, apart from emotional response.
Of course we are going to imply one is "blind" but I don't think most mean for it to come across as a personal attack, just exasperation, lol.
God bless.
Hell is deduced., like the Trinity. It is not explicitly stated, but you can discern the reality of it.,
Do you think it's a coincidence that the Orthodox, Catholic, and even Protestant churches all universally agree that Hell is real? I doubt very seriously any heretic is going to convince me otherwise.
You say that when a person perishes and becomes dead they remain conscious.
I would like to have you prove this.
Everyone I know that has perished and been dead has been completely unconscious.
If they were conscious they would object to being buried. (And especially the embalming. That right there would have be torture on a conscious person.)
When I die, if I am still conscious while I am dead, I'm going to ask the mortician to not embalm me.
Let me ask this: does one receive life when they are born again or not?Since, as you claim, I will be conscious. In fact, since I will be conscious while I am dead, I'll just hop up and go fishing. Why not? If my boss calls, I have the perfect excuse. "I can't come to work today, I'm dead. I'll be in tomorrow."
Now, please prove that dead people are alive.
You are asking for special pleading on the word "Dead". Go ahead and prove that dead means alive.
Well, of course the solution is to get a seeing eye dog. Just think of me as your dog.
I'll try to put a smiley on the posts when I am razzing. I don't intend anything to be mean. I've been told that I'm going to hell ALOT. I'm glad that you aren't like those guys. (exclusively tormentists)
It is just frustration. The bible says plainly that the wicked perish and will be no more, and you say something like "but that doesn't mean that they die and cease to exist!" I just can't get used to this. Everytime that happens my jaw still drops and I say:o
If it does not actually mean "eternal torment" then it should be reworded to what it actually means.
Our Gnostic scripture teaches degrees of punishment.
However, I believe this still denotes a childish appreciation for the power of God. He is God, for goodness sake, and nothing is supposed to be out of his power.
I am a HereticTechnically, Tim isn't a heretic (nor is anyone else in this thread so far as I can tell):
2089 Incredulity is the neglect of revealed truth or the willful refusal to assent to it. "Heresy is the obstinate post-baptismal denial of some truth which must be believed with divine and catholic faith, or it is likewise an obstinate doubt concerning the same; apostasy is the total repudiation of the Christian faith; schism is the refusal of submission to the Roman Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him. (CCC)
He would be schismatic, or possibly apostate depending on how you define 'the Christian faith'.
My thought process is extremely objective. I am trained in critical thought. This isn't the first time I have been up against superstition.
Six says?
Adam and Eve?
Did Moses see God's butt?
Did a donkey talk?
metaphor?
Great. Now convince me that the God of Love ordered Joshua to destroy every living thing he came in contact with.
Ooops----"All who ever came before me were as thieves and robbers". Well, I guess that part is true enough.
It does finish the Parable started in Enoch.
You see, I believe that an action, if it is evil, is evil of it's own accord. There were women doing their dishes, tending their babies, men who were just trying to get their work done...and Oooops....here comes Attila..Hitl..errr Joshua.
Hey, maybe his men were reluctant...."it's OK private, God told me we had to....make sure you look in their pockets and bring me any coins you find." Gott Mit Unns.
Hello Soulgazer, sorry for taking so long but you might have noticed I am both sharpening my iron and have quite a few others in the fire, lol.
But I am looking forward to our discussion, as with you there are some aspects that differ from others that adhere to annihilation, so it has a different focus. Which is, a denial of the veracity of scripture which is accompanied by an acceptance of what most Christians would themselves reject, such as what they would view to be spurious books and a total reliance upon the words of other men, not to mention leaning heavily into self-reliaance.
Where one can pretty much determine their beliefs as it is convenient. I don't say that to be smug or offensive, simply to put my view on the table.
Now then...
Actually it has. We call that translation. Apart from existing in the First Century and be aquainted with all aspects of the use of the language and...the abuses, even as we see in our day, such as changing "What did you say?" to "Say what?" or "Brother" to Bro," then we are left to translation that seek to make the original easily undersatandable.
But we do know enough to say that we can understand eternal to mean etrnal and destruction to mean destruction, but, we have to also look at the context of the whole counsel of God. Just as we would look at the 20th century in the 40th century in a broader base to understand the use of words like "cool." Or "Bad." Or even "murder." If a 40th century scholar concluded from the statement "This heat is murder" that the heat was personally responsible for murdering someone, then we would have a paallel to the problem I see annihilationists having, whereby they charge those that believe punishment is eternal that they teach God as a torturer rather than the torture is more like the phrase..."This heat is murder."
Hope that makes sense.
Extra-biblical sources are generally accepted because they are similar to the word of God.
When it comes to the books I personally hold as false writings, this is something that one must for him/herself make a decision on. Knowing that we will be judged according to the knowledge we possess, I myself do not think it necessary to study beyond the 66 books which I myself believe to be inspired of God. Let's face it...there is enough there to keep one busy for three lifetimes or more.
I have read in the Apocrypha, and was not impressed. While I believe we can give some historical value to some of it, again, I do not recognize it as inspired.
Exceot maybe creating the world in six days?
Making a donkey speak like a man?
Beginning the human race with two people?
Quite the opposite of "childish faith," if you ask me. It speaks volumes about one's conclusions about God. First that He could not do these things, and secondly that He could not properly reveal His works and will to man and keep it pure.
Continued...
Yes, we see.So you see, I am not going to make any attempts to convince you.
I am a HereticI do not subscribe to catholicism in any of its forms, pre or post council of Trent. A "Heretic" is a meaningless term unless you are talking about keeping someone out of your particular denomination. Paul stated that he was considered a Heretic----and Jesus too, of course, was considered a heretic by the Jews.
They all said God commanded it----they sure weren't going to say it was a devil. However, actions do speak a whole lot louder than words.
Now that I have dumped on the Jewish faith, let me say I am not anti-semite---you can believe anything that helps you sleep as long as you don't harm anyone else.
As for the New testament, except for a few letters of Paul, I have read enough and talked with enough historians to be convinced most of it was written in the late first to mid second century.
Understandable, as everybody thought that they weren't going to be around that long, and by the time anyone figured it out there was some scrambling to write some stuff down.
And they did. Rather than leave out anything, even if it might seem ludicrous, they wrote down every tale they had heard no matter the source.
I have no problem with that either. I am pretty sure that the original charge that John was written by Cerenthus was true. I don't care.
I look at all the scriptures, in the bible and out.
How do you know he is?How do you know you aren't placing your faith in the works of men?
Of coarse I admit it, when it comes to sourcing the bible. Otherwise I might subscribe to "pagan" belief that John wroteThat does not mean that words cannot be as deadly, especially on an eternal level where doctrine is concerned.
Not sure who the "they all" are.
In other words, "You want to believe false doctrine, I'm okay with that...just keep it out of my back yard," right?
The objective of the word of God is that man might know the One True God, and that they might know what is expected of Him. So I am always going to have an issue with those that teach a universal brotherhood of man, a universal Fatherhood of God, and that there are many paths to Heaven.
Whether or not you are anti-semitic or not is known toyou and God, and is irrelevant.
It is not irreverence to try to lead one to the truth, despite their "faith." In the case of the Jew, on a national basis, outside of Christ, Israel awaits the veil being removed, that she might embrace Christ. As a whole, Israel is a pretty secular nation at this point. And while I can have respect for the orthodox, this is not the same as considering them as being in relationship with God through the New Covenant. Only those that are in the Body of Christ from among them are on relationship with God in this Age.
You admnit it yourself: it is the historians that have led you to your conclusions. If you were concerned that there might be something to the reverence given the Holy Bible by millions of people you would be far more intent in searching this issue out for yourself.
Anyone can have their mind changed, but only the word of God can change the heart.
Oh, you speak of the gnostic scriptures...
Just kidding. I have spoken with many atheists that also make the mistake of placing their faith in the works of men.
Have you not read enough to know that God does not impart understanding to the natural man that he might have a proper view or understanding of His word?
The only understanding scripture gives natural man in regards to His word is the work of the Holy Spirit, which is given that man might be saved. The sad thing is this: many will have that work upon their hearts, and reject it. Then, there is a scramble...to seek out a basis for a conclusion that was made. Atheists do this. They will latch on to anything that soothes their conscience, which is hammered by the internal witness of God.
It is apparent, sorry.
Not true: you just admitted you have not looked at all of the word of God.
I would highly recommend this.
This is simply a way to say "I accept other holy scriptures even if Christianity rejects them because they are contrary to what is written in the word of God."
Only by a study of the Bible can one compare that with extrabiblical sources. We see in scripture quotes from secular sources, not because all of what the source held to was to be embraced, but that even pagans didn't get everything wrong.
In other words, "even the blind dog finds the waterbowl every now and then."
Continued...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?