Kinda confused about that...
Can someone who doesn't believe in Hell give me a simple list of reasons why?
Can someone who doesn't believe in Hell give me a simple list of reasons why?
Kinda confused about that...
Can someone who doesn't believe in Hell give me a simple list of reasons why?
Not only was the Hebrew word proliferated but blown out of the same proportion as a bogeyman demon!Phan and XP are right. When the bible was first printed in english, the word used to interpret for 2 hebrew words and 2 greek words (which is ridiculous) was hell, and as phan explained...it meant to cover or conceal. I don't know why they chose to translate it that way as there were plenty of more correct words that they could have used. From there in the last 400 years of man's foolish influence and agenda's the word now means a place of eternal torture and torment. Something that neither the ancient hebrews or early christians believed in. These were pagan beliefs that infiltrated the church. It is important to note that the majority of the church at the time of the council of Nicea was east of Jerusalem, so the various bishops and scribes grew up in the lands where these pagan beliefs originated. Just like paganism has interlocked with the catholics churches teachings throughout South America in the present day, so to did a place of punishment interweave with jewish and christian teachings well after the Torah and the writings of the early church were written and taught. In fact, though there were smatterings of it earlier, in the 4th century these perversions of church teachings became rampant throughout christendom.
Hell was a tool of fear and control. Before Simony was outlawed, the catholic church used the fires of purgatory to squeeze money from people, particularly the rich by saying that the churches prayers would get the people out of purgatory faster and into heaven. These indulgences funded the building of monastaries, cathedrals and the finery of the church. They pillaged europe to fill their coffers using these lies for centuries. Why would they ever admit they were wrong? Now, in an age of conspiracy and the da vinci code, modern christians look at the book of revelations, which is a symbolic book and says so right at the beginning of the book in verse 1 when it says he 'signified it' (which means as a sign or symbol), christians are determined to find literal meanings to the lake of fire. It is where all of the nonsense of eternal punishment, annihilation and other such doctrinal heresies come from. The church doesn't want to admit they don't know and the people who make their living out of religion will never own up to their duplicity because 'fear' is a great motivator and leads to the filling up of bank accounts.
Here is a good article on the symbolism of revelations and the lake of fire and the 2nd article actually reveals the truth about the lake of fire.
The Lake of Fire Pt1 article
Remnant Bible Studies The lake of fire Pt2 Intro Page
Both of which you will find very informative. There are also papers dealing directly with the the topic of hell on the site as well.
We don't refuse to believe in hell because we are rebellious and heretics. We don't believe in it because the bible never teaches it. If the bible taught something else, then i would believe that. But it doesn't. So I don't. It's not a small subject and the answers aren't easy to take, but if you are willing....then you could learn something amazing. It's up to you.
Sure I can, if by Hell you mean eternal torment.Kinda confused about that...
Can someone who doesn't believe in Hell give me a simple list of reasons why?
Not only was the Hebrew word proliferated but blown out of the same proportion as a bogeyman demon!
The belief of the Hebrews down to the Babylonian exile seems but dimly to have recognised either Satan or demons, at least as a dogmatic tenet, nor to it any occasion for them, since retreated moral effigy is a properly human act (comp. Gen. iii), and always subjective and concrete, but regarded misfortune, according to theological axioms, as a punishment deserved on account of sin at the hands of a righteous God, who inflicted it especially by the agency of his angels (2 Sam. xxiv,16; comp. 2 Kings xix. and was accordingly looked upon as the proper affliction of every afflictive dispensation (Amos iii, 6). Cyclopaedia of biblical, theological and ecclesiastical literature. page 776
Fear God, not the bogeyman who is is an amorphous imaginary being used by false hell-fire preachers and adults to frighten people into compliant behaviour!
2Sa 24:16 And when the angel stretched out his hand upon Jerusalem to destroy it, the LORD repented him of the evil, and said to the angel that destroyed the people, It is enough: stay now thine hand. And the angel of the LORD was by the threshingplace of Araunah the Jebusite.
Amo 3:6 Shall a trumpet be blown in the city, and the people not be afraid? shall there be evil in a city, and the LORD hath not done it?
I would like to correct one misconception. When "Israel" was "taken into captivity" archeological findings confirm that it was the political elite, and NOT the entire nation. Egypt in Exodus probably doesn't count, as it, at this current time, is believed that this is a fabricated story based on mercenary accounts to give the nation a separate identity from the rest of the Canaanites of which they were an indigenous part. However, it was the Temple Elite taken into Babylonia. As such, there were no "foreign" ideas introduced to the youth, except via normal osmosis of adjoining societies.I think he-man, that very few people remember how many times the Hebrews were under bondage. Most Christians know about the 400 years in Egypt, but few don't know about the 2nd bondage where over 100,000 were taken to Egypt in the 1st century BC. Babylon for 70 years (2 generations). They were also invaded and ruled by the Philistines (called at the time 'the sea peoples') who invaded and ruled not only Israel, but they also invaded and ruled Egypt for 70 years, which when they were over thrown, led to the Rise again of Egyptian military domination through out the region. There were Jewish enclaves in every major city of the day.
What has this to do with our point? You can see in in any new immigrant family that comes to a new homeland. All it takes is the very next generation...their own children to be influenced by the new culture they grow up into. They develop a mixed view on life based on the beliefs and traditions of their families, but also this gets diminished by the influence of the new. Then, every new generation changes a little more as the culture of the day changes their beliefs.
This is how beliefs and teachings change. From one generation to the next. There doesn't even need to be willful intent to change things. It just happens.
That's why it was so hard for the Israelites to accept the new ways of God when they set out to build a new nation. Egypt was all they knew. In fact, the old testament history shows that they never really did successfully get paganism out of their systems.
That's how the truth gets perverted. As a christian for almost 40 years, I have seen many fads and beliefs come and go.
When I started in the late 70's, the word of God and teaching was at the forefront. Then the 80's, people pushed the prophetic...prayer warriors, deliverance ministries, prosperity teachers. Let me tell you. Very little of it was inspired by God. It was generally people trying to take advantage of the church by buying their books, sending money....all fads.
History has shown them to be that shallow empty constructions that they are.
I am grateful that I received sound instruction and input. I fear for this current generation who are presented with a low fat, low carb christianity and rarely are taught to count the cost. To put off the old carnal man and to put on the new. To die to the flesh and to hear his voice and obey.
When they started to use smoke machines during church services, I knew we were in trouble.
I would like to correct one misconception. When "Israel" was "taken into captivity" archeological findings confirm that it was the political elite, and NOT the entire nation. Egypt in Exodus probably doesn't count, as it, at this current time, is believed that this is a fabricated story based on mercenary accounts to give the nation a separate identity from the rest of the Canaanites of which they were an indigenous part. However, it was the Temple Elite taken into Babylonia. As such, there were no "foreign" ideas introduced to the youth, except via normal osmosis of adjoining societies.
Such self identity stories are common even in fairly modern times, such as Columbus "discovering" America, fating the indigenous population to ignominy.
Consider also, that "foreign" concepts are not all a bad thing---It was the Sadducee who "kept the faith pure" by refusing to adopt the concept of an afterlife into Temple Judaism (There were conceptually as many forms of Judaism as there were American Indian religions)....it was the Pharisee that pushed for Hellenization after the Hasmonean Dynasty fell that urged the adoption of the Greek concepts of Heaven and Hell. No religion is anywhere near as old as the story it tells about itself. One would probably have to have a historical doctorate in Zoroastrianism to understand all the ins and outs of Judaism.
"Pagan" simply means "Hillbilly" or "country bumpkin". Uneducated folk often interpret religion into their own capability of understanding... The snake handlers of the Appalachian would be "Pagan" in the true definition. Here in the south there are many "pagan" preachers doing tent revivals with their own superstitious bent. "Skinhead" and other right wing Christian terrorist groups are also "Pagan". Technically, anyone who looked on the religious accounts as literally factual, without the mitigation of the knowledge behind them might be considered "Pagan". The Church used to fight Paganism by keeping religious texts only among trained priests. After the invention of the printing press, paganism flourished.
This is not to be confused with "Barbarian" which simply meant anyone outside the "barb" or borders of the Roman empire.
Smoke machines This reminds me of the wonderful mechanical contraptions used in ancient temples to perform "miracles"--- Dancing or bleeding statues and other "miracles" would keep the congregations enthralled.
Kinda confused about that...
Can someone who doesn't believe in Hell give me a simple list of reasons why?
Judaism, especially with the scripture that we are most familiar with (Pharisee) is very syncratic, with various cultural mythologies adopted and intermixed with "spun" historic happenings. The entire concept of an afterlife was adopted from the greek around 300-350BC. Before that time the focus of Judaism as an overall religion was on the preservation of political power via the collective nation. Even older stories such as the creation myth in Genesis is a polemitized version of the Enûma Eliš, an older Babylonian myth. Some other creation accounts used in ancient Judaism are Sumarian and Zorastrian in origin. The "Noah's Ark" is a direct adaptation of the ancient Sumarian myth of "Gilgamesh".I was aware that the Babylonian exile was the cultural and political elite. My point of the families is that there was enough time and generations in bondage for the culture and teachings to change, including the introduction and adoption of hell type beliefs by the descendants of the original captives, thus changing the doctrines taught to future generations with multiple captivities.
Hell (Sheohl, Gehenna,Hades) The actual word hell means to "cover over" and is taken from the root words I have given in parentheses. These words actually mean "grave" or "pit" and do not refer to any fire. Throughout the ages men have influenced Biblical teachings (Dante, Milton, etc.) and the Catholics as well, till we wind up with all kinds of man made illusions intertwined with spiritual truth. Even Johns visions of the Apocalypse (which some refer to Constantine) are used to tell us the lake of fire is hell. At every turn, churches try to conform believers into their circles, using hell as a stick, with the ticket to heaven as a carrot. Some even thinking that they have the only way there.
There is only one theme for a Christian. "Love the Lord God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind and love your neighbor as yourself".
There is only one set of laws for a Christian: The Ten Commandments
There is only one person to follow: Jesus, who showed us that eternal life was real, who showed us that the Ten Commandments were now spiritual laws and not physical laws, showed us how to pray to our heavenly father for our salvation and taught us the need for baptisms through water and fire.
After that the Holy Spirit is your guide. Hell will be a place you will not have any concern with, nor will search about.
Phan and XP are right. When the bible was first printed in english, the word used to interpret for 2 hebrew words and 2 greek words (which is ridiculous) was hell, and as phan explained...it meant to cover or conceal. I don't know why they chose to translate it that way as there were plenty of more correct words that they could have used. From there in the last 400 years of man's foolish influence and agenda's the word now means a place of eternal torture and torment. Something that neither the ancient hebrews or early christians believed in. These were pagan beliefs that infiltrated the church. It is important to note that the majority of the church at the time of the council of Nicea was east of Jerusalem, so the various bishops and scribes grew up in the lands where these pagan beliefs originated. Just like paganism has interlocked with the catholics churches teachings throughout South America in the present day, so to did a place of punishment interweave with jewish and christian teachings well after the Torah and the writings of the early church were written and taught. In fact, though there were smatterings of it earlier, in the 4th century these perversions of church teachings became rampant throughout christendom.
We don't refuse to believe in hell because we are rebellious and heretics. We don't believe in it because the bible never teaches it.
The verse you are talking about is;If theres no hell then why does it say something about getting tormented forever and ever somewhere in the bible?
I hear a lot of people say this. But how do you even know all of this anyway?
If theres no hell then why does it say something about getting tormented forever and ever somewhere in the bible?
Judaism, especially with the scripture that we are most familiar with (Pharisee) is very syncratic, with various cultural mythologies adopted and intermixed with "spun" historic happenings. The entire concept of an afterlife was adopted from the greek around 300-350BC. Before that time the focus of Judaism as an overall religion was on the preservation of political power via the collective nation. Even older stories such as the creation myth in Genesis is a polemitized version of the Enûma Eli, an older Babylonian myth. Some other creation accounts used in ancient Judaism are Sumarian and Zorastrian in origin. The "Noah's Ark" is a direct adaptation of the ancient Sumarian myth of "Gilgamesh".
The Pharisee changed the focus from preservation of national and political power to the theme of improvement of the individual, the concept adopted from the Greek after contact with Alexander; Christianity continued and tweaked the process via the removal of draconian cultural law into something useful for the development of individual morality.
If one want's to blame "Hell" on a specific group, that would be the developing catholicism of the mid to late second century. There are many catholic specific writings and interpolations all throughout the New Testament. It is, after all, an anthology put together by catholics for the promotion of catholicism. I think equal time credit should go to the Greek Philosophers on which the concept is based though.
I don't have a copy...I may have to look for one. The development of various ancient beliefs has always intrigued me.I think I still have a copy of "the Epic of Gilgamesh" left in a cupboard somewhere left over from university days....Must look for it again one day.
I don't have a copy...I may have to look for one. The development of various ancient beliefs has always intrigued me.
Slightly off topic, but I promise not to diverge much, and hook it back to the topic--- The "Torah" version of God was rejected by most of Christianity until it was re-integrated by catholicism. However, here and there the old version of Christianity has left it's mark. The Torah version of God was thought of as a "daemon" posing as the Almighty, and exorcisms and folklore found even today include the usage of Iron as antithetical to evil powers because of Judges 1:19.
To tie it back in, this earlier version of the Christian God punished here on earth, but forgave all human sin because of the crucifixion of Jesus.