- Nov 22, 2017
- 220
- 90
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Faith
- Unorthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
It doesn't make sense to me at all, what do they think Hell* is for in that case?
Last edited:
One mainstream view of the real enternal reality of hell is that human souls there are "destroy"ed (Matthew 10:28), they "perish", and do not have eternal life. (John 3:16). They are not immortal like the Devil and his angels. Instead of enduring in the eternal fire, they experience the "second death" (Revelation 20:14)) which is not a metaphor.
Any case, we don't have to know which terrible outcome it is, because any of those terrible outcomes we are not going to suffer if we endure till the end with faith in Jesus our Christ. Matthew 7:24-27
It doesn't make sense to me at all, what do they think Hell* is for in that case?
It doesn't make sense to me at all, what do they think Hell* is for in that case?
The most common reason given is that they cannot reconcile the idea of a God who would do that with their idea of a God who must be all-forgiving an all-loving. Those who are deeper thinkers point out that there are a few verses in Scripture which seem to suggest universal salvation (but not necessarily absent any kind of punishment whatsoever in the afterlife) and that the idea of universal salvation was more common in the early days of the church although it died out afterwards.
Do you want it to be eternal? Are you hoping it's eternal? While maybe you might not end up in this place, what about friends and family members that might? Do you wish it to be eternal for their sakes? If it were solely your choice, would you rather this place be eternal or no? I'm just trying to understand the mindset behind those that see this place as eternal and why they see it as eternal, and if they are glad that it's eternal, or perhaps wish it wasn't instead. It's one thing to conclude it's eternal because one feels that's what the Scriptures teach. It's another thing to be glad it's eternal, as opposed to wishing it weren't instead.
Both annihilation and ECT (eternal conscious torment) can be debated from scripture. I think annhilation has a stronger scriptural foundation...but we already have a thread on that for debate.
To me ECT as a punishment is logically inconsistent with a loving God. It is literally the most evil thing you could do to someone for absolutely no purpose.
Yes great grief before that final end. The 2nd idea I've never heard on any scripture.Isn't there wailing and gnashing of the teeth? I've also read that with the Rapture that those in Hell, satan and his demons will simply cease to exist. By ceasing to exist, does one just witnesses blackness for eternity?
Also, would you mind explaining the annihilation theory? I'm not clear on it and having really come across it before thanks.
It doesn't make sense to me at all, what do they think Hell* is for in that case?
About Hell: The ultimate Hell is eternal death. The Bible does describe the grave as "Hades" translated as hell also. The lost will face eternal destruction in the very end at the 2nd resserrection .... not "burn in hell forever" as some faiths teach. They will be totally destroyed. God is not torturing God. He is a loving God.
The saved will receive everlasting life, the unsafe will receive everlasting death.
Psalms 1:6
Psalms 37:20
Psalms 69:28
Psalms 34:16
Psalms 92:7
Proverbs 24:20
Daniel 2:35
Isaiah 1:28
Isaiah 30
Isaiah 31
Obadiah 1:16
Malachi 4:1
Matthew 10:28
John 3:16
Matthew 7:13
Matthew 7:19
Matthew 13:40
John 15:6
Philippians 3:19
2 Thessalonians 1:9
1 Corinthians 3:17
2 Corinthians 2:15
2 Corinthians 2:16
Romans 6:23
James 4:12
2 Peter 2:3
Revelation 20:14
eternal conscious torment is way too much, nobody deserve that.
Wishful thinking, perhaps?
It disturbs some people to think that someone could spend eternity in Hell- even more so when they realize that there's probably going to be a lot of people there. So, they're inclined to "reason away" the idea of eternal punishment.
First let me say that I think there are coherent versions of ECT that are not a logical contradiction. Your example is one particular case, the other being that in hell one commits an infinity of sins and so accrues an infinite set of punishment for those sins. However I think there is good biblical reason to believe that people are manually inserted or cast into the lake of fire. So it seems God doesn't just leave and then everything becomes the lake of fire, but that God takes those people and puts them there. So in that case, the individual sinner is the formal cause, and God is the causal agent in Aristotelian causes and so the final cause (aka the purpose) must be something that is consistent with Gods nature.God doesn't love evil, he hates sin, he leaves people to their own carnal desires and lusts. People send themselves to Hell, God doesn't, he offers them a way to escape eternal punishment by following His Commandments and living a godly life on our time here on Earth.
Also, would you mind explaining the annihilation theory? I'm not clear on it and having really come across it before thanks.