That big busineesss,, big gorvernmnent, big bnanks, are in caahhhhoooootttsss together ? (a bigggg busssinesssss plannnn, for their own prophet.. er ... profit. )So? What exactly does that prove other than people like conspiracy theories?
Please quote where anyone said the planes did not crash ?Are you crazy? Shall I post witness statements from people who watched the planes crash or not?
"Big government" can't even cover up their little scandels, you think they can cover something as big as 911? It would take millions of people working together and no one leaking the truth. The logistics are astronomical.That big busineesss,, big gorvernmnent, big bnanks, are in caahhhhoooootttsss together ? (a bigggg busssinesssss plannnn, for their own prophet.. er ... profit. )
Not so. Look how easy it was to cover up the sinning of the titanic......"Big government" can't even cover up their little scandels, you think they can cover something as big as 911? It would take millions of people working together and no one leaking the truth. The logistics are astronomical.
Okay, an other one then, > In 1930's it was published for all to read how to take care of a common cancer, easily and inexpensively. The author/ care provider was blasted from all sides, even though proven true with no exceptions 3000 times in a few decades.I don't know what that means.
"Big government" can't even cover up their little scandels, you think they can cover something as big as 911? It would take millions of people working together and no one leaking the truth. The logistics are astronomical.
Project Summary
This is a study of the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC7) at 5:20 P.M. on September 11, 2001.
The objective of the study was threefold: (1) Examine the structural response of WTC 7 to fire loads that may have occurred on September 11, 2001; (2) Rule out scenarios that could not have caused the observed collapse; and (3) Identify types of failures and their locations that may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The UAF research team utilized three approaches for examining the structural response of WTC 7 to the conditions that may have occurred on September 11, 2001. First, we simulated the local structural response to fire loading that may have occurred below Floor 13, where most of the fires in WTC 7 are reported to have occurred. Second, we supplemented our own simulation by examining the collapse initiation hypothesis developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Third, we simulated a number of scenarios within the overall structural system in order to determine what types of local failures and their locations may have caused the total collapse to occur as observed.
The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse. The secondary conclusion of our study is that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the building.
There will be a two-month public comment period from September 3 to November 15, 2019, with the final report to be released later this year. During this period, we welcome any and all members of the public to submit constructive comments intended to further the analyses and presentation of findings contained in the report. Designated reviewers external to UAF and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth will also review the report during this period.
source: WTC7
You are seriously trying to tell me you believe that George W Bush decided to kill thosands of American citizens for some unknown reason and thosands of people went along with it? That's delusional.It wouldn't take 'millions' of people at all, plus they haven't really covered it up have they? There's loads of videos which basically prove that the official narrative is spurious.
A study conducted by the University of Alaska concluded that World Trade Centre 7 didn't collapse due to fire damage:
The powers that be have got away with it, but they haven't succeeded in covering it up.
It's a bit like North Korea, where I'm sure some people believe that Kim Jong-il genuinely didn't defecate and would denounce anybody who said otherwise. However I imagine the more independent thinkers will realise that the claim is nonsense. Regardless, that's the official narrative there, but it doesn't mean they have fooled all the people.
You are seriously trying to tell me you believe that George W Bush decided to kill thosands of American citizens for some unknown reason and thosands of people went along with it? That's delusional.Okay, an other one then, > In 1930's it was published for all to read how to take care of a common cancer, easily and inexpensively. The author/ care provider was blasted from all sides, even though proven true with no exceptions 3000 times in a few decades.
HOW did the biggies cover that up ? (only about 1% , maybe, or up to 12 % (guessing) on a good day, of normal everyday citizens know about this, and they won't challenge the government nor other biggies that opposed it)
Just like false prophets, false teachers, etc etc etc... eh? A little truth, then WAHM@! gotcha .... if not tested and proven BEFORE accepting what they say ...Government is noting but a lie, may be 1% truth thrown in just to keep people guessing what real and what is not.
Truth IS stranger than fiction.You are seriously trying to tell me you believe that George W Bush decided to kill thosands of American citizens for some unknown reason and thosands of people went along with it? That's delusional.