Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I notice that your MO is dismissive denials or ascertains that never get backed up with anything substantial.... again, another high message count poster with not a lot to contribute.Why? You'll just handwave it. It's freely available if you're genuinely interested.
Amen!If only we could see the beauty of Heavens glory, we not care about evolution anymore. I have suffered so much, and i wondered how i would go on. THe Lord is my portion says my soul, i will hope in Him. I will be satisfied with my daily bread and heavenly clothes. His grace is sufficient to sustain me. Though i am so very weak, he is strong. Take me to the cross. Take me there. I am dead and raised with Christ in heaven, i am hidden with Christ in God, in heaven. This world and all its woe is not my home. Praise the Lord! HE restores my soul and leads me in paths of righteousness for His names sake.
I believe it is the combination of nakedness (for they were naked but not ashamed) and the knowledge / insight they gained by eating from the tree (and their eyes were opened) and they noticed they were naked, there suddenly is shame about the nakedness, when their eyes were opened (to the knowledge of good and evil a.f.a.i.k.)
When the serpent is described as being in the Garden in the passage about Tyrus, he is described as decked with stones.
God and the angels are dressed too, you see, but now Adam and Eve had become like gods, knowing good and evil (Genesis 3:22), but they were not "dressed for it" (as in not dressed).
So, chemistry isn't science? Seems to me there are quite a few 'proven' formulations.... but what do I know.No. Mathematics is mathematics. Science is anything that practices the scientific method. Mathematics doesn't, although there are similarities.
Again, nothing in science is ever "proven".
I go with Genesis 2:25
Yes, i'm tired too, and a foreigner in the world..
Why? How?No, i have addressed and tackled your problem with Scripture.
Yes, it is followed by Genesis 1:18-25 and Genesis 3, where i suggest Genesis 3 happened on the 7th day, but that was not about your point.
Bottom line:
Plants and animals were created again in the Garden of Eden, in presence of Adam, who God had put in there.
(They're expelled from the Garden of Eden a.k.a. Paradise in Genesis 3:23)
Replication doesn't require the observer to personally replicate the event to be scientific. That's why astronomy is a science, even though we can't personally replicate things like supernovas. Replication of predicted and previous observation is scientific, too, and we have that for evolution.So, chemistry isn't science? Seems to me there are quite a few 'proven' formulations.... but what do I know.
So, what about evolution passes the scientific method? Let's see, let's try this out.... can one species evolve into another? Systematic observation?.... well, since we don't have any evidence of macro evolution, it's rather difficult to observe. Measurement... without anything to measure, this one is moot. Experiment.... kinda hard to do experiments on something we have never seen... one could, I suppose, try and cook up some chemical primordial soup and see if it produces anything meaningful. Won't hold my breath on that one. Formulating hypothesis... at this juncture, the only hypothesis is that this theory is lame. Testing, and modification of hypotheses.... I think the only thing being tested here is a sane persons patience so the modification of the hypothesis is that macro evolution is a fairy tale.Nope. Nothing in chemistry is "proven" either.
That's my take on it Mr. Armoured, why don't you try it and see if you can replicate my findings.
Because a god in a bathrobe and long beard personally designing everything 6000 years ago with tweezers and magnifying glass is much more "majestic" than a God who operates across billions of years and light years.I see evolution as another method for Satan to distract people from the power and majesty of God.
Sorry you don't take God at His word.....Because a god in a bathrobe and long beard personally designing everything 6000 years ago with tweezers and magnifying glass is much more "majestic" than a God who operates across billions of years and light years.
I can post as many links to evidence of, what you erroneously call, "macro" evolution as you like. Indeed, go back far enough in my post history and You'll see I have done so previously, many times, for many poster claiming there is none. That's why I'm less inclined to do so again. I recognise the MO. Why bother when you're not goin to read it, it's freely and easily available already, and already been posted here a couple thousand times?I notice that your MO is dismissive denials or ascertains that never get backed up with anything substantial.... again, another high message count poster with not a lot to contribute.
Nice goal post shift. It's called "metaphor". Or do you think Jesus is literally a baby sheep?Sorry you don't take God at His word.....
Nope. Nothing in chemistry is "proven" either.
I'm sorry if it contradicts what you think you know about science, but science doesn't prove anything. Including chemistry.A variation of the emperor with no clothes.... "look at my brilliance" while spouting foolishness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?