- Apr 5, 2007
- 140,178
- 25,220
- 55
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Married
Apparent God found it sufficient to let the statement stand. And I never said not implied that God took personal pleasure in torturing and murder. I quoted scripture. You are the one who drew the conclusion, erroneously I might add.If you are going to leave unexplained the quote: “it pleased God to crush Him” to be understood as it stands, you would have to conclude from that one statement: God takes personal pleasure in His torturing, humiliating and murdering of Christ.
So is that the meaning you would like us to draw?
Is that your personal understanding?
Interpreting that statement in light of other verses and looking at other English translations of that statement, explains how God pleasure in Christ’s obedience to allow His Crucifixion does not mean God takes personal pleasure in the actual torturing and murder of the innocent.
Upvote
0