So, just unsupported personal opinion... but at least you were honest enough to admit it.You can cite... me.
Upvote
0
So, just unsupported personal opinion... but at least you were honest enough to admit it.You can cite... me.
So, just unsupported personal opinion... but at least you were honest enough to admit it.
The 'burden of proof' is on the claimant. In the Physical & Life Sciences forums, you're expected to support the claims you make.Most of what I opine about is supported. You just have to know where to look.
The 'burden of proof' is on the claimant. In the Physical & Life Sciences forums, you're expected to support the claims you make.
Why do you think evolution is working towards some predetermined end goal? It is not.
Having an immune system that performs TOO well can cause problems.
Since it seems to have stopped I assume it's reached it's goal.
Actually if it's causing problems something is malfunctioning.
How have you determined evolution has stopped?
So tell me, what exactly did you mean by improving the function of the immune system?
Please answer the question I asked.
What changes would you expect to see in the immune system if you improved its function?
We do know - human evolution continues apace.
Sure, Google can help, for example: Human evolution is still happening:Can I get an update on the changes.
Sure, Google can help, for example: Human evolution is still happening:
"Our DNA shows evidence for recent selection for resistance of killer diseases like Lassa fever and malaria. Selection in response to malaria is still ongoing in regions where the disease remains common.
Humans are also adapting to their environment. Mutations allowing humans to live at high altitudes have become more common in populations in Tibet, Ethiopia, and the Andes. The spread of genetic mutations in Tibet is possibly the fastest evolutionary change in humans, occurring over the last 3,000 years. This rapid surge in frequency of a mutated gene that increases blood oxygen content gives locals a survival advantage in higher altitudes, resulting in more surviving children.
Diet is another source for adaptations. Evidence from Inuit DNA shows a recent adaptation that allows them to thrive on their fat-rich diet of Arctic mammals. Studies also show that natural selection favouring a mutation allowing adults to produce lactase – the enzyme that breaks down milk sugars – is why some groups of people can digest milk after weaning. Over 80% of north-west Europeans can, but in parts of East Asia, where milk is much less commonly drunk, an inability to digest lactose is the norm. Like high altitude adaptation, selection to digest milk has evolved more than once in humans and may be the strongest kind of recent selection.
We may well be adapting to unhealthy diets too. One study of family genetic changes in the US during the 20th century found selection for reduced blood pressure and cholesterol levels, both of which can be lethally raised by modern diets." phys.org/news
Would you just answer the question? What changes in the immune system can we expect to find if we improve it.
The only changes I can think of are the number and variety of microbes. Otherwise the basic function doesn't change, it just becomes more efficient and thus more effective.
The number and viarities of microbes that... what? Do they comprise the immune system? Are they detected by the immune system?
And what does it mean for the immune system to be more efficient? Does that mean it produces more antibodies? Better antibodies? It reacts more quickly?
Why are you so vague?