Allandavid
Well-Known Member
- Dec 30, 2016
- 8,056
- 6,929
- 70
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Married
They aren’t.....
Upvote
0
Is there really such a thing? Is God having children here, and over there Satan is having children too?
Human nature.
This is a serious question. Let's pretend, for the sake of this thread, that there is no spiritual realm and there was no Fall. What reason do people give for the abundance of bad people? Thieves, liars, sexual predators, murderers, etc. It's rife, and it's non-stop. In the absence of a spiritual realm, why are so many people so bad?
I´m not sure what the presence or absence of a "spiritual realm" (whatever that may be) has to do with anything.This is a serious question. Let's pretend, for the sake of this thread, that there is no spiritual realm and there was no Fall. What reason do people give for the abundance of bad people? Thieves, liars, sexual predators, murderers, etc. It's rife, and it's non-stop. In the absence of a spiritual realm, why are so many people so bad?
I guess it´s a glass half full/half empty kind of thing (wherein some people would even call a 95% full glass "half empty" ) .I think you hold the minority opinion.
Well I specifically didn't say "most". And I haven't used "evil" since we're assuming no spiritual realm. However, I suspect that every day there's at least a murder in most big cities. Watch the local news for a few days and you'll see how much violent crime goes on in your city. Multiply that by the hundreds of decent-sized cities in the USA. Then expand out into how many bad people there are in positions of power throughout the world.Honestly, I don't see it being so rampant or frequent.
MOST people I meet, are not "rapists, murderers and thieves".
MOST people I meet, are relatively normal people with their good and less-good sides.
But there is a difference obviously between "less-good sides" and downright "evil" sides.
"less good" would be things like consiously speeding on an empty road, driving home while knowing you had 1 glass of whine to many (but thus aren't utterly drunk - rather just slightly over the legal limit), etc
"downright evil" being things like planning and executing full-scale robberies, murders, etc.
The "downright evil" people, are not numerous at all. They are a minority among a minority.
There are some 7 billion people in this world you know.... You might read every day an article about a murder somewhere... but nobody is writing about the billions that just go about there day.
...whereas it would make complete sense in a spiritual world?Being bad is prolific, and I just wonder why people have that propensity in a purely materialistic world.
It is relevant because if there is a spiritual realm, this realm could include an evil side, which would easily account for man's propensity toward evil. I just wanted to look at the question from a purely secular/materialistic pov (if possible).I´m not sure what the presence or absence of a "spiritual realm" (whatever that may be) has to do with anything.
People need to balance their own needs and those of 7 billions other people - which are often in conflict. That´s a pretty difficult task.
Also: Whenever I talk with a person who is labeled "bad" by others, I am arriving at the conclusion that this is a pretty lazy label. Each of them have their own causes and reasons for making their choices the way they do.
So, with there being a spiritual realm, you´d be content with the explanation "because that´s the way it is"?It is relevant because if there is a spiritual realm, this realm could include an evil side, which would easily account for man's propensity toward evil.
I´m not sure what exactly needs to be explained about it. Why would you expect the opposite?I just wanted to look at the question from a purely secular/materialistic pov (if possible).
I don´t see how it does. (Saying "there just is this spiritual side" isn´t an explanation).Yes.
Maybe it would be a good idea for you to discuss it with those who keep asking the very opposite question: Why, in the absence of a spiritual realm, is there morality?This is a serious question. Let's pretend, for the sake of this thread, that there is no spiritual realm and there was no Fall. What reason do people give for the abundance of bad people? Thieves, liars, sexual predators, murderers, etc. It's rife, and it's non-stop. In the absence of a spiritual realm, why are so many people so bad?
Not with "because that's the way it is", but if we assumed a spiritual realm, then we have a fairly complete explanation of evil from the Bible. The fall of Lucifer, the temptation and Fall of Adam & Eve, the line of sin passed from generation to generation, etc.So, with there being a spiritual realm, you´d be content with the explanation "because that´s the way it is"?
I´m not sure what exactly needs to be explained about it. Why would you expect the opposite?
And 49% of homicides in the US are perpetrated by African-Americans and most of those are directed against other African-Americans.
Dangerous reasoning that.
Well I specifically didn't say "most".
And I haven't used "evil" since we're assuming no spiritual realm
However, I suspect that every day there's at least a murder in most big cities.
Watch the local news for a few days and you'll see how much violent crime goes on in your city.
Multiply that by the hundreds of decent-sized cities in the USA. Then expand out into how many bad people there are in positions of power throughout the world.
It is relevant because if there is a spiritual realm, this realm could include an evil side, which would easily account for man's propensity toward evil. I just wanted to look at the question from a purely secular/materialistic pov (if possible).
Of course not. If we were assuming the existence of a spiritual realm, it would indicate that there are "outside" forces at work to influence people towards doing things that are bad. Being influenced is different from actually committing the act. And it would explain why all people have an evil bent since we've all been affected by the sin of the Fall.Wait...
Does that mean that you are saying that in the context of a "spiritual realm", people aren't responsible for their bad behaviour? And that they then are "driven" by some kind of "evil side" / external forces of reality and that that in itself, explains their wrongdoings?
Well thats a great post. I'm mostly uneducated in philosophy too, so I'm not bothered by that one bit.Sorry I don't understand what you are saying here, but I'm a rookie at philosophy so I can definitely be making some mistakes, feel free to correct me if my terminology is off.
But my biggest problem so far as I understand materialism is to deny the looking glass that every human sees through. I forget if you said it in here, but the best we can do is look at the cards in the deck (of reality), and we should really separate the cards that we know are in the deck (from our perspective) from the deeper philosophical thoughts of inventing cards (like theories that we are really just brains in a vat on some other planet light years away, or that I didn't just see what happened with my own eyes, but rather my eyes are just an illusion, etc). If you boil everything down, at the most basic level humans can only make judgement calls on reality through the lens of being a human. The things that we literally experience are the greatest 'Proofs' that we can ever hope for...and through our vantage point of being human virtually every one of us who has ever existed understands (again because we all literally experience it) contemplating 'Meaning.' We also 'Experience' this tug of war between these scientifically meaningless concepts called right & wrong. And we are completely surrounded by other 'Test Subjects' that confirm this, "Hey John you've had thoughts about meaning right? Jen, you've thought about meaning, and right & wrong haven't you? Hey Bob..., etc" I literally can't find any human who says no to these questions! So this would be a virtually universal consensus. A consensus like that is firm ground in my book.
But to say these experiences are not real data because science can't measure it is to have humans literally throw away unanimous experiential evidence, which is the greatest of all evidence. The tool of scientific inquiry is literally the wrong tool for an answer to meaning, you may as well bring a ruler with you to figure out how many gallons of water is inside of a tub. When people contemplate meaning the first things that come to mind are things outside of scientific measurement such as love, the search for happiness, the desire to see your kids happy, the joy of competition, the realization that you're head over heels in love with NASCAR lol, etc. I'm a total beginner with philosophy, but I am finding it confusing that a lot of people are taking a tool that can not even measure meaning (science)...and using it to reach their conclusion that there IS no meaning (only matter and space). Huh?? Why did they use that which can't measure meaning to reach a conclusion about meaning??
But I think getting even closer to materialism theory would be using the idea that all the materials that make up a human brain 'Mimic' a quest for meaning, but so what, that's simply what the materials result in if you combine them the right way...an entity called 'A Human' that thinks it has meaning pops out. Well my problem with that is that you again are throwing the human vantage point away (which is your REAL foundational deck of cards). We look for logical patterns that make sense everywhere, like in biology, among so many other things. And from our vantage point of observation this whole 'Making logical sense' thing seems to have a pretty impressive record. Eye matter makes sense for this reason, and for that reason...preditors have narrow eyes as opposed to wider eyed prey for a logical reason. Ear matter makes an awful lot of sense for hearing. The matter that makes up the anatomy of a penguin makes sense for a trillion different minute logical reasons so that it will survive in insanely cold temperatures, and the list goes on & on.
BUT...the matter that causes the human brain to contemplate meaning (and think that meaning actually exists) was just a practical joke? Nothing concrete behind it, no actual meaning? Why throw away pattern recognition when we reach this specific example of materials placed together for a logical reason? Where there was eye matter there was vision. Where there was ear matter there was hearing. Where there was penguin matter there was surviving in Antarctica. Since we are up to our eyeballs in examples of matter configurations that make logical sense, I would have to follow up with the pattern and ALSO infer that the matter that makes up a human brain that thinks 'Meaning' is real, also makes sense, and is not just a practical joke.