That would be a unfruitful course of action not because it is wrong but rather it just won't work. Some people have always wanted the message found within the Bible to be about their own imaginations and how to run/educate the world into conformity, inside or outside of Christianity.We should have the courage to admit that the Bible should and can be updated, not by re-writing it through translation and interpretation, but through looking at it and saying: This is how things were, but this is how we want them to be. We can accomplish these changes by departure—but not at the price of claiming that our beloved version, the cornerstone of our contemporary community, is something else than it actually and originally is. Not all social change, perhaps, can be antedated back to the Sinai myth or similar ones."
Inside Christianity their have been people like Marcion who tried removing vast portions of the Bible very early on and later things like the "Slaves Bible" was published. Where large portions of it we're also removed because you don't want a slave reading about how Moses led Israel to freedom.
Outside Christianity even more so, people want to figure things out for themselves because there's a very fine line between "myth" and "unexplained phenomena". It's called the supernatural where the pre-incarnate God of the OT was born of a woman, died and three days later was bodily resurrected.
Upvote
0