AlasBabylon
Mystic
Thanks, I missed that one. Have you read The Ezekiel Option by Joel Rosenberg? It is also based on Ezekiel 38.
No, I haven't. I bet it's interesting.
.
Upvote
0
Thanks, I missed that one. Have you read The Ezekiel Option by Joel Rosenberg? It is also based on Ezekiel 38.
It is in an edge of your seat kind of way.No, I haven't. I bet it's interesting.
.
Oh no, I think you misunderstand. The Ezekiel 38-39 events are for the very end of this world, the Hamongog being a result of the battle of Armageddon on the final 7th Vial of Rev.16 when Jesus showed He comes "as a thief". So it actually does agree with Paul in 1 Thess.5 about the "sudden destruction" upon the wicked and deceived, which prophecy originated from the OT prophets like Isaiah 29.
It should be remembered that the fall of Gog and 5/6th of his forces on the mountains of Israel does not equate to the defeat of the entire coalition of the northern army. It is a mistake to compartmentalize the entirety of the Ezekiel 38-39 account.
We're never ever going to have a complete chronological step by step itinerary of everything that takes place until after it occurs.
What we do know is that Gog makes his initial move during a time of peace. This isn't some hastily-thrown-together-last-minute invasion. It is planned( Ezekiel 38:10 ), they are fully prepared & equipped( Ezekiel 38:4 ).
This is not the battle of Armageddon. The battle of Armageddon involves "all" nations coming against Israel and are headed up by the antichrist.
There are a couple of decisive "battles" during the war of the great tribulation period.
I don't agree with how you're treating the idea of the Gog/Magog army out of the northern quarters coming upon Israel not being the Armageddon of Rev.16. The supper of the Great God in Rev.19 is the same supper in Ezek.39:17-20, and happens on the final day, the "day of the Lord", for that is why Jesus is being described there in Rev.19 coming on a white horse with His army from Heaven.
Because what you're insinuating with this is that there will be peace right up until just before the battle of Armageddon, which just isn't the case. I've already pointed out the conditions that exist before Gog makes his move to Israel.
19 For in My jealousy and in the fire of My wrath have I spoken, Surely in that day there shall be a great shaking in the land of Israel;
20 So that the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the heaven, and the beasts of the field, and all creeping things that creep upon the earth, and all the men that are upon the face of the earth, shall shake at my presence, and the mountains shall be thrown down, and the steep places shall fall, and every wall shall fall to the ground.
KJV
Those things are to occur on the final day of this present world, on the "day of the Lord".
How is that synonymous with the battle of Armageddon? Are you aware of the fact that the day of the Lord isn't referencing a single specific 24-hour day, but rather an extended period of time within the tribulation involving judgment?
The only explanation that makes sense regarding the cleanup, feast, etc., is the prophecy jumps ahead and skips over events, which is typical in numerous OT prophecies regarding the day of the Lord.
What you are heeding instead is a doctrine from men linked to the pre-tribulational rapture theory of men (by John Darby in 1830's Britain). Those are trying to move the "day of the Lord" event back in time so as to make their theory of the rapture timing to be prior... to the tribulation.
So where are you placing the time of the cleanup, which I'm assuming you are meaning the burning of the weapons for 7 years, and the burying 7 months of the remains of Gog and his multitude? One thing seems certain, none of these things can parallel the 70th week. During the 70th week saints are being persecuted by the beast, therefore wouldn't be burning weapons for 7 years. It seems to me then, this cleanup has to be meaning after the time of the beast in Revelation 13, at least.
....
It should be rather obvious in these verses together that the day of the Lord encompasses more than just a 24-hour period of time...
....
During the 70th week saints are being persecuted by the beast, therefore wouldn't be burning weapons for 7 years.
Daniel 9:27 refers to "he". Where is "he" said to be vile? The antecdents of "he" are Messiah and prince in the previous verse(s). Nowhere therein is a "vile person" explicit or implicit.To assume Daniel's final "one week" of Dan.9:27 has already been fulfilled, and applying the events of that verse to Christ Jesus, is to say that Jesus is the "vile person" of Dan.11, since the events in Dan.9:27 directly link to the wickedness the "vile person" does in Jerusalem.
Daniel 9:27 refers to "he". Where is "he" said to be vile? The antecdents of "he" are Messiah and prince in the previous verse(s). Nowhere therein is a "vile person" explicit or implicit.
There is no link except in your imagination.Quit playing games with semantics and look at the events of Dan.11 that link to the Dan.9:27 verse and you'll find the 'he'.
There is no link except in your imagination.
"He" in v. 27 is the "prince" in v. 26.Easy to show you wrong:
Dan 9:27
27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.
KJV
And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week:
Dan 11:21
21 And in his estate shall stand up a vile person, to whom they shall not give the honour of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
KJV
Dan 11:23
23 And after the league made with him he shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
KJV
Dan 11:28
28 Then shall he return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land.
30 For the ships of Chittim shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant.
KJV
The "league" is obviously involving the reconstituting of "the holy covenant", i.e. the old covenant to include another temple and animal sacrifices. Jesus made no league or covenant during His Ministry.
Dan.9L27 "...and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate...."
That is about ending the daily sacrifice requirement as part of the old covenant. And instead he places an idol abomination in its place...
Dan 11:31
31 And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that maketh desolate.
KJV
Simple. The "he" of Dan.9:27 is that "vile person".
And the prince in v. 26 and v. 25 is Messiah. Thus:"He" in v. 27 is the "prince" in v. 26.
Now I DID... show you that from 2 Pet.3:10 in my previous post but you said NOTHING about it because it obviously ends ANY argument about that "day of the Lord" lasting any longer than a moment. Apostle Paul showed it as the "sudden destruction" in 1 Thess.5.
Isaiah 2:12,20 & Revelation 6:15-17 would be a good place for you to start, not to mention Revelation 9:10 and keeping in mind that the seals & trumpets are in chronological order. It should be rather obvious in these verses together that the day of the Lord encompasses more than just a 24-hour period of time...