lesliedellow
Member
- Sep 20, 2010
- 9,652
- 2,582
- Faith
- Calvinist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- UK-Liberal-Democrats
Why?
Because the periodic table has nothing to do with things decaying.
Upvote
0
Why?
Talking in vague circles again eh?Well done Dad, your ignorance of elementary physics is on display again, and you are using bombast to try and cover it up.
Try Newton's third law.
Talking in vague circles again eh?
Looking at one site talking about that, I see this..
"A variety of action-reaction force pairs are evident in nature. Consider the propulsion of a fish through the water. A fish uses its fins to push water backwards. But a push on the water will only serve to accelerate the water. Since forces result from mutual interactions"
Newton's Third Law
A very apt example, in our situation, where you engage in fishbowl physics!
You were supposed to be supplying an equation of motion which doesn't involve time. We are still waiting with baited breath.
Some poeple should learn how to listen.
What the debate needs is people who have some capacity to focus and be honest and comprehend.
Perhaps you could wisely use that time to contemplate this higher math.
Q=?
Newton's third law means that the application of a force doesn't necessarily result in motion, which directly contradicts your post 204. That is the point sunshine.
Because the periodic table has nothing to do with things decaying.
May I suggest you contemplate the interior of an aerosol can? Plenty of force on the walls of the can, but no motion. Doubtless your genius will be able to work out why that doesn't mean that Newton got it wrong.
For the record, do you believe the Ten Plagues as recorded?
Why weren't they recorded elsewhere?
(Or were they?)
Is that Boyle's Law?Not to disagree but there is motion inside the aerosol can. Pressure is due to the collective crashing into the walls of the can by the molecules inside the can (Kinetic theory of gases). Just sayin'....
That shows a lack of depth and grasp of what all the little letters represent and how they could or could not apply to deep space.The great thing about that equation is there is literally NOTHING to contemplate!
Unless it went back to the periodic table.
That shows a lack of depth and grasp of what all the little letters represent and how they could or could not apply to deep space.
Is that Boyle's Law?
Going back to the periodic table is my way of saying it crumbled to dust.I gotta ask what the Periodic Table has to do with the 10 plagues of Egypt. Honestly, I'm extremely curious now.
Decay.Are you talking about alchemy and metallurgy?
Doesn't matter starlight. The motion we observe and are talking about is in the heavens. Who cares what caused it? Motion, force, acceleration and etc all depend on distance. Welook at something we think is so far away that moves.
Decay.
Going back to the periodic table is my way of saying it crumbled to dust.
In other words, the three hours of darkness could have been written down by every nation on earth, but over time their writings crumbled to dust.
Hey, until you find one, stop pretending that what you do find applies to deep space, where you do not have any proven time! As you point out equations of motion require time!Equation of motion which doesn't involve time please. Still waiting.