EmbattledBunny
Well-Known Member
That is a very good beer.
Is lying permitted in this forum? That is an awful beer. Negative reps to you!
Upvote
0
That is a very good beer.
Is lying permitted in this forum? That is an awful beer. Negative reps to you!
Well - drink the good beer first, then drink the cheap stuff and then have unprotected sex. Should be good for having a few precious kiddies at least.
Tying up loose ends is all.
Well - drink the good beer first, then drink the cheap stuff and then have unprotected sex. Should be good for having a few precious kiddies at least.
Tying up loose ends is all.
Thanks for making me nearly choke on my hot chocolate!
Well - drink the good beer first, then drink the cheap stuff and then have unprotected sex. Should be good for having a few precious kiddies at least.
Tying up loose ends is all.
No way, man. My Catholic duty is to drink this
and then be maken teh babies. Our Lord only made good booze, so we should only drink good brews...right?
Wrong. The Lord brought the GOOD wine out at the end of the wedding. That means you have to drink the cheap stuff FIRST!
Wrong. The Lord brought the GOOD wine out at the end of the wedding. That means you have to drink the cheap stuff FIRST!
Ah, but Jesus didn't make the cheap swill. He only made the good stuff. I figure He was at the reception and wanted to have some good stuff, but didn't want to be rude and be all "hey, your wine is swill so I made some for you to serve instead", so he patiently (patience being a virtue and all) waited until the box wine was gone to make his move. Instead of making a social gaffe, he saved the party that a) was serving bad booze and b) was in danger of running out of booze. Everytime we find ourselves at a party and the halfer is cashed and they're passing around a hat to get another one before the liquor store closes, we should all remember to pause and reflect on what Jesus would have done - brewed up some good stuff on the spot. We can't do that, good wine takes time - but it's good to pause and thank the Lord for His miracles.
I need a magnifying glass i think....oh my living God, I just saw this on google images and had to share it with you! JUST LOOK!
*cut*
I need a magnifying glass i think.
The more I think about it, the more I just don't get it. I can understand artificial birth control that can possibly be abortifacent not being allowed, but what is the issue with condoms? With NFP it seems like couples deliberately have sex during infertile periods. It seems like using a calendar to keep sperm and egg apart. With a condom it's a piece of rubber. So what's the difference?
You did alright.Condoms can act as a type of aborificient if they are lubricated with spermicidal liquid. Plus a condom is designed to stop a woman from becoming pregnant, so I can see why the Catholic Church would be against this as it does appear to be man interfering with God's grand design. Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, I actually don't know the RCC's official teaching on this and if I have misrepresented it in any way, shape or form, I apologize now as that is not my intent.
Cain Spencer said:I did put it there but it took up nearly the whole age so I had to delete it! Sorry, here is a quick link, it's just an image but a beautiful one at that!
Google Image Result for http://centurycafe.com/images/CC-Cakes/chocolate-strawberry-cake-001.jpg
i just had a thought, some people argue that that "well when anti-condom people says that ABC goes agianst nature what about fixing broken legs and antibiotics... condoms are the same, it uses science to make our life better"
but antibiotics do not go agianst nature, it is using technology (in this case medicine) to make something (our immune systerm) do a better job of what it is supoed to do (kill pathogins in our bodies) so it is natural in a way
science is bad when it preverts what something is ment for to twist it into something else, like removing the procreative aspect from sex