I have committed no crime. But there is a much more heinous crime than you have falsely accused me of, and which you are guilty of. You would deceive others into believing that God has placed an arbitrary limitation upon the efficacy of the blood of Christ.
This couldn't be further from the truth. Nothing God does is arbitrary. Arbitrary means "without reason or purpose". The Bible gives reasons for what God does: it is the purpose of His will. It is for the praise of his glorious grace. It is so His purpose can stand. Etc. Just because you don't
like the reasons the Bible gives doesn't mean they are arbitrary.
On the basis of your strange belief, the judgment of God falls upon those who remain in their rebellion, only because they are unable to exercise faith, which only God can give, and which He has refused to give them.
False. They are not condemned for something they can't do. They are condemned for something they are unwilling to do. Their inability stems from their unwillingness. It's not as if there is someone that is willing to obey the gospel, but is somehow unable to.
You blaspheme the grace, the love and the integrity of God
Yes. God saves billions and billions of people that should have gone to hell, out of pure love and grace and mercy. HOW HORRIBLE!!!!!!!!! What blasphemy to believe God stepped in and intervened to save anyone at all!!
You make God morally responsible for the unbelief of the unbeliever, and saddle Him with the guilt of the guilty as an aider and abettor of their sin.
I don't know what you think you are arguing against, but it isn't anything I believe. God is
not responsible for man's unbelief and rebellion; man is. Maybe you should accurately represent me, instead of, you know, misrepresenting me.
If anyone stops rebelling against God, it is because of grace, not because some people are just morally better than others.
Jesus has made it abundantly clear that any reluctance is on man's part, not on God's.
I'm glad we agree. Why on earth did you think I believed otherwise?
In conclusion, it saddens me that you turn God's grace into something evil. All men deserve hell, and God steps in and saves billions of them, for no reason other than He is being kind. To this, you stomp your foot in rebellion, you spit in God's face and accuse such a belief of being blasphemous. Why? All because He didn't save
everyone (universalism). The double standard here, of course, is that the same is true of your belief. You, too, don't believe God saved everyone. In fact, God didn't intervene, in your view,
to save even a single person! In your view, it is all left up to chance. Heck, the entire human race might have landed in hell, in your view.