What is the barrier between micro and macro evolution?

[Gottservant]

You haven't even made an attempt to answer the question in the thread title and OP: What is the barrier between micro and macroevolution?

The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).

It doesn't happen by chance.

 

[Shemjaza]

A rhythm is a pattern of instinct or essence, in principle.

But you are not answering the question:You can't swear that an Evolution will be adapted for all time, why would multiple generations validate it?

There isn't an answer to that question, because it doesn't make sense.

Changes don't need to validated by generations, because they aren't a choice. Changes occur and if they are beneficial then they will be statistically more common in each generation.

There's no conscious decisions in the process, so it isn't sensible to describe it as validated.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).

It doesn't happen by chance.

Nope, that's not a barrier. That's you just spouting nonsense.

You really do not know anything about evolution, and you really either need to actually make the attempt to learn or just learn not to make comments about evolution.

 

[Gottservant]

There isn't an answer to that question, because it doesn't make sense.

Changes don't need to validated by generations, because they aren't a choice. Changes occur and if they are beneficial then they will be statistically more common in each generation.

There's no conscious decisions in the process, so it isn't sensible to describe it as validated.

You are saying I don't know members of my own species!

You are making me mad!

 

[Gottservant]

Nope, that's not a barrier. That's you just spouting nonsense.

You really do not know anything about evolution, and you really either need to actually make the attempt to learn or just learn not to make comments about evolution.

I understood what you meant by "it only happens to generations as a whole", but it took a long time to understand why you would not want to qualify in what way it happened for a given species - what I learned was, you just don't think about it: the first sign that you could care less who is behind what, you jump ship?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

I understood what you meant by "it only happens to generations as a whole", but it took a long time to understand why you would not want to qualify in what way it happened for a given species - what I learned was, you just don't think about it: the first sign that you could care less who is behind what, you jump ship?

Again, all you are showing is that you don't know what you are talking about. So just stop talking.

 

[Shemjaza]

You are saying I don't know members of my own species!

You are making me mad!

No, I'm saying that you knowing members of your species is totally irrelevant to evolution.

 

[Subduction Zone]

A rhythm is a pattern of instinct or essence, in principle.

But you are not answering the question:You can't swear that an Evolution will be adapted for all time, why would multiple generations validate it?

As usual you failed at asking a rational question. Since environments are always changing no adaptation is perfect. It won't last forever. Your question tells us that you still do not understand what you are arguing against. There is no band in evolution. There is no rhythm section. No string section. Why are you on a Big Band . . . oh . . conflation.

No, the Big Bang is not the Big Band.

This is a Big Band:

 

[Subduction Zone]

The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).

It doesn't happen by chance.

Wow! Finally you got something right. Natural selection is not chance.

 

[Frank Robert]

How can you expect to debate in a Creation & Evolution Forum and not recognize 'belief' as being part of the conversation? And, you're not the only one.

I am not denying that there when you look in the mirror you believe you see design. I am only a fact that there is no evidence for design. Now do you grasp the difference.

 

[AV1611VET]

There is no barrier between the two because macroevolution doesn’t even exist, except with a large dose of speculation. My speculation is that we were created in accordance with Genesis 1:26-28, and therefore, it's only microevolution (variations and adaptations) thereafter.

Seconded.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Seconded.

HE LIVES!

 

[AV1611VET]

HE LIVES!

Thanks!

 

[Joy]

MOD HAT ON

After Staff Review

This Thread
is Now
Permanently Closed

As requested by OP.

MOD HAT OFF​