The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).
It doesn't happen by chance.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You haven't even made an attempt to answer the question in the thread title and OP: What is the barrier between micro and macroevolution?
There isn't an answer to that question, because it doesn't make sense.A rhythm is a pattern of instinct or essence, in principle.
But you are not answering the question:You can't swear that an Evolution will be adapted for all time, why would multiple generations validate it?
The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).
It doesn't happen by chance.
There isn't an answer to that question, because it doesn't make sense.
Changes don't need to validated by generations, because they aren't a choice. Changes occur and if they are beneficial then they will be statistically more common in each generation.
There's no conscious decisions in the process, so it isn't sensible to describe it as validated.
Nope, that's not a barrier. That's you just spouting nonsense.
You really do not know anything about evolution, and you really either need to actually make the attempt to learn or just learn not to make comments about evolution.
I understood what you meant by "it only happens to generations as a whole", but it took a long time to understand why you would not want to qualify in what way it happened for a given species - what I learned was, you just don't think about it: the first sign that you could care less who is behind what, you jump ship?
No, I'm saying that you knowing members of your species is totally irrelevant to evolution.You are saying I don't know members of my own species!
You are making me mad!
As usual you failed at asking a rational question. Since environments are always changing no adaptation is perfect. It won't last forever. Your question tells us that you still do not understand what you are arguing against. There is no band in evolution. There is no rhythm section. No string section. Why are you on a Big Band . . . oh . . conflation.A rhythm is a pattern of instinct or essence, in principle.
But you are not answering the question:You can't swear that an Evolution will be adapted for all time, why would multiple generations validate it?
Wow! Finally you got something right. Natural selection is not chance.The barrier is that the parents don't know how to provide "a chain of successive evolutions" (that is tailored to the child, in principle).
It doesn't happen by chance.
I am not denying that there when you look in the mirror you believe you see design. I am only a fact that there is no evidence for design. Now do you grasp the difference.How can you expect to debate in a Creation & Evolution Forum and not recognize 'belief' as being part of the conversation? And, you're not the only one.
There is no barrier between the two because macroevolution doesn’t even exist, except with a large dose of speculation. My speculation is that we were created in accordance with Genesis 1:26-28, and therefore, it's only microevolution (variations and adaptations) thereafter.
Seconded.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?