The article parrots the same revisionist history and draws the same faulty conclusions which prevailed in the thread you hint at. Here is the point of the linked post, quote:
"So, what is a Republican? Too often it is someone willing to let every political position be vetted and shaped by a small but powerful core of religious extremists and latent racists."
Again, idiotic sophistry on the part of the author.
Be it known I have gone to GOPlifer's site and am engaging in debate there. As for CF, Stamp is certainly free to post what links he needs to support an argument, but that isn't what is being done in this case. Stamp is continually posting links to someone else's blog site and then asking us to discuss what was written there. My response is simple. If GOPlifer wants his thoughts debated here, he should come here and debate them himself.