Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Recently a friend asked me if the Bible prohibits premarital sex. This friend takes the Bible very seriously and his question was honest and sincere. He could not find any clear statements in the Bible prohibiting premarital sex. It’s an important question. It certainly is relevant to our culture!

It’s important to note that my friend was not looking for justification to allow himself to have premarital sex. He is a faithful husband who loves his wife and seeks to live a life pleasing to God. And he doesn’t think premarital sex is a good idea. But he isn’t satisfied with basing his moral opinions on what most Christians think or what church leaders and Christian authors say. He wants a clear, rightly reasoned, Biblical basis for everything he believes. He wants people to obey all of God’s commands, but he doesn’t want us to make up rules for people that are not in the Bible and treat those rules as if they are from God. He is right to want a clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis for the standards we expect ourselves and others to live by.

In this Opening Post I will share why I believe the Bible does not support premarital sex. I will strive to provide the clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis my friend and others are looking for. Sometimes it is very easy to discern the Biblical teaching on an issue. For example, having sex with another man’s wife is clearly, repeatedly, explicitly condemned throughout the Bible. Adultery is always wrong. But the case against premarital sex is not as simple. The case is strong, but it will take several pages to explain it.

What the Bible Doesn’t Say and Why this Doesn’t Settle the Issue

There is not a simple statement like “Do not have sex before you are married”, or “Only have sex after you are married”. Does this mean that premarital sex is allowed, at least under some circumstances? Not necessarily.

The Bible includes prohibitions against hurting your neighbor in a number of ways, but there is not a specific statement saying “You may not poison your neighbor.” They knew about poison in Biblical times, and the Bible mentions poison but never gives an explicit law against using poison. Nevertheless, we know it is wrong to poison someone. We know this because we are able to apply broad commands and principles found in the Bible to many specific situations not named in the Bible. The Bible says, “Love does no harm to a neighbor” (Romans 13:10). Based on this, it is quite obvious that poisoning your neighbor is sin.

Is there a similar argument against premarital sex? I’m convinced there is, but it is not as immediately obvious as the argument against poisoning your neighbor.

The Bible’s Broad and Repeated Condemnation of Sexual Immorality

There are a number of broad warnings in the Bible against “sexual immorality”. The phrase “sexual immorality” often translates the Greek word inappropriate contenteia. Here are some examples: 2 Corinthians 12:21, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, Colossians 3:5.

I believe that the term “sexual immorality” is an excellent translation for inappropriate contenteia. The term includes any type of sin which is sexual in nature. Sometimes inappropriate contenteia refers to adultery. Matthew 5:32 is a good example of this because Jesus is discussing a sexual sin which a wife commits. But in Matthew 15:9 inappropriate contenteia is included in a list of sins along with the more specific Greek word for adultery (which is moicheia). Because none of the other sins in the list are two names for the same sin, I think this indicates that inappropriate contenteia includes sin other than adultery. The fact that there are multiple types of inappropriate contenteia is also supported by 1 Corinthians 5:1, where Paul mentions “a kind” of inappropriate contenteia.

The idea that in the New Testament inappropriate contenteia was used to refer to a broad range of types of sexual immorality is supported by the Greek lexicons I am able to consult. Here are the relevant excerpts from three widely used lexicons:

Premarital%2BSex.jpg


These lexicon entries demonstrate that prohibitions against “sexual immorality” in the New Testament cover more than adultery. To see that these prohibitions include premarital sex we will have to look at the Old Testament background which is required to more fully understand the meaning of New Testament teachings.

All Parts of the Bible are Relevant

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

It is true that many parts of the Old Testament law code given to Israel as a nation do not directly apply to us today. However, it would be a great and serious error to think that because these laws do not apply directly they do not apply at all. There are truths and principles we can see in these laws which teach us God’s will. They also help us understand the commands in the New Testament, which do apply directly and fully.

In Deuteronomy and Exodus We See that Premarital Sex is a Serious Sin

This passage is worth reading in full:

Deuteronomy 22:13 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then hates her
14 and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, 'I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,'
15 then the father of the young woman and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of her virginity to the elders of the city in the gate.
16 And the father of the young woman shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man to marry, and he hates her;
17 and behold, he has accused her of misconduct, saying, "I did not find in your daughter evidence of virginity." And yet this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the cloak before the elders of the city.
18 Then the elders of that city shall take the man and whip him,
19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the father of the young woman, because he has brought a bad name upon a virgin of Israel. And she shall be his wife. He may not divorce her all his days.
20 But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman,
21 then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father's house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.
On the one hand, we are no longer required to whip a man who falsely accuses his new wife of not being a virgin, nor to stone a woman who is discovered not to be a virgin on her honeymoon.

On the other hand, we must remember that Deuteronomy is inspired by God. Why would God say that a man “accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name on her” by claiming a woman was not a virgin when she got married if in fact there is nothing wrong in God’s eyes with premarital sex? Why would the man be whipped and fined if he was not making a serious false accusation of sin? Furthermore, why would God say she has “done an outrageous sin” which is similar to “whoring” if the ONLY thing there is evidence of is that she had premarital sex? Why should she be stoned!? All of this only makes sense if God views not being a virgin when you get married to be a serious sin. And the only way you become not a virgin is premarital sex. (In this post I’m not discussing the case of rape, which is among the most terrible and evil of all sins. In the case of rape, a woman is no longer a virgin physically, but in God’s eyes she is completely pure and innocent, and should be in our eyes as well.)

This same principle is seen in the case of a man who seduces an unmarried woman:

Exodus 22: 16-17 If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride-price for virgins.

The Hebrew word translated “seduces” is patah. It usually carries a negative meaning such as “deceive” or “entice” as can be seen in here:

Proverbs 1:10 My son, if sinners entice (patah) you, do not consent.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, then why does God use a word which generally means to deceive or to entice to sin to describe a man talking a virgin into having premarital sex? And if the father does not allow the man to marry his daughter, why is the man forced to pay anything if premarital sex is not wrong?

These Old Testament passages demonstrate that God does view sex before marriage as wrong. This in turn means that premarital sex is a type of sexual immorality and that when the New Testament speaks against sexual immorality in general, this includes premarital sex. It is like poisoning your neighbor. There is not an explicitly spelled out prohibition in the New Testament, but broad prohibitions include these things (poisoning people and premarital sex) as sins.

What About Premarital Sex with the Person You Plan to Marry?

Someone might object that the examples in Deuteronomy and Exodus above would not seem to apply if a young couple was planning to get married and they both agreed, without coercion, to have sex beforehand. After all, in such a case the husband would obviously have no right to be upset because his wife was not a virgin!

There are at least three problems with this line of reasoning.

The first problem is that no matter how certain you feel that you are going to marry someone, you do not know for sure that you will actually marry them until you are pronounced husband and wife. We can make plans that we fully intend to carry out and yet those plans do not always come to pass. James warns us about this:

James 4:13 Now listen, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money."
14 Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.
15 Instead, you ought to say, "If it is the Lord's will, we will live and do this or that."
16 As it is, you boast in your arrogant schemes. All such boasting is evil.​

Sadly, there have been many young people who really, truly believed they were going to marry someone, and based on this belief they went ahead and had sex. Then something happened and they did not marry that person. James warns that if you think this kind of thing can’t happen to you, you are being arrogant.

But, even if you do end up marrying the person, this still does not mean that premarital sex was right.

The second reason premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is wrong is that it is contrary to the Holy Spirit inspired advice given by the Apostle Paul. Paul addresses the specific case of a person who is not yet married and who feels a strong desire to go ahead and have sex before marriage. Again, it is helpful to quote the relevant portions of an extended passage:

1 Corinthians 7:1 Now for the matters you wrote about: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman."
2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.
3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. . . .
7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. . . .
36 If anyone is worried that he might not be acting honorably toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if his passions are too strong and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married.​


Paul says something that may seem shocking to our sex-saturated, anything goes, culture: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” Sex is not like water, food, or air. We can actually live without it.

Yet, Paul is also realistic (the Bible always is!). He realizes that many of us will struggle intensely with sexual desire. He speaks specifically here to the unmarried. Today’s solution to this problem is to go ahead and have sex. Paul’s solution, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is to direct unmarried people with a strong desire for sex to go ahead and get married.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, why would Paul speak of a young man who is having trouble controlling himself with the virgin he is planning to marry as “not . . . acting honorably”? If Paul thought premarital sex was ok, shouldn’t he have said something like, “If you’re planning to marry someone and feel like you can’t wait, don’t feel guilty about it, just go for it!” How different Paul’s Holy Spirit inspired thinking is from the popular way of thinking in our culture.

The third problem with the tempting idea that it is ok to have premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is that even if in your case you do get married, you are setting a bad example for others:

Romans 14:21 It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.

Sexual immorality is rampant in our culture. It is causing huge harm in terms of the spread of disease, children being raised without both parents in the home, and emotional damage. Even if in your case these specific negative consequences do not occur, if you engage in premarital sex you will be encouraging others to. Try explaining, “It’s ok for me, but not for you.”

What Counts as Sex?

Sometimes people who are dating want to get around the prohibition on sexual immorality by engaging in all types of sexual acts short of intercourse. Is this right?

There are two Bible passages which lead me to believe that any type of interaction intended to be sexually stimulating counts as “sex” when it comes to obeying God’s commands. The first passage is this one:

Matthew 5:28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

It would be absurd to think that you can’t look lustfully at a girl but it is ok to do sexually arousing things short of intercourse.

The second passage is one we already looked at, but we need to look at a more literal translation:

(NAU) 1 Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the things about which you wrote, it is good for a man not to touch a woman.

Some translations translate the Greek word for “touch” in this verse as “have sexual relations with” or something similar. But the word literally means “touch”. In this context it is clearly talking about touching in a sexual way. But this could include all kinds of touching short of sexual intercourse.

What if I’ve Already Blown It?

If you’ve already had premarital sex, there is hope for you in Christ Jesus. As with any sin you should:

confess
repent
believe
avoid

Confess: You have to begin by submitting to God’s Word and agreeing with God that your actions were sinful.

Repent: You express to God a deep desire to turn away from your sin and with God’s help to stop sinning. You cannot promise you will never stumble again, but you must be truly committed to stopping your sin with God’s help. If you have no intention of obeying God then you should not think that you will inherit the Kingdom of God (see 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). If you are truly striving in Christ to put your sin to death and flee from sexual immorality, you can know that you are forgiven and that God will strengthen you in your battle with sin.

Believe: Believe God’s promise that your sins are forgiven and cleansed by His grace in Christ Jesus (see 1 John 1:9). You do not have to carry a burden of guilt. Your shame is washed away. You are free!

Avoid: The devil and your own flesh and the world around you will try to entice you to fall back into sin. Expect a spiritual battle. Flee from sin! It might not be easy, but don’t give up. In a previous post, I shared some ideas which can help you overcome temptation.

I close with a prayer:

May the Lord keep you from falling into temptation. May He guard your eyes, your thoughts, and your actions. If you have already stumbled in this area, may He lead you to repentance. May you find forgiveness and cleansing and freedom from shame. And may you begin to live in victory. Thank you, Lord, for Your good and righteous commands, for Your forgiveness when we sin, and for Your help and strength when we face temptation. Amen.

This was initially a post on my blog.
 

JIMINZ

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2017
6,600
2,358
79
Southern Ga.
✟157,715.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Do you think premarital sex is always wrong?
.
To make a long story short,......YES!

Premarital sex is a sin against yourself.
In the same way we become one flesh in marriage, spiritually become one flesh in through Premarital sex.

Sex in all of it's forms is a Spiritual thing, it isn't the different acts which one can perform which constitutes sin. it is the connecting with another human in the Spirit.

This Spiritual connecting is reserved for Marriage, it's Gods plan, anything outside of God's correct Plan of Marriage is sin.

Example:
A man has Premarital sex for years before actually getting married.

This man Marries a woman who is a virgin, he then dishonors her by bring into the Marriage bed, all of the Premarital sexual partners he has connected himself to.

Is there any wonder we have such a high Divorce rate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: St_Worm2
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,246
45,333
67
✟2,915,768.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Do you think premarital sex is always wrong?
Yes, agreeing with JIMINZ as well, premarital sex is always wrong. I agree with your entire, very well written and reasoned, OP arguments as well.

One of my very favorite "inappropriate contenteia" passages is this one.

1 Thessalonians 4
3 This is the will of God, your sanctification; that is, that you abstain from sexual immorality;
4 that each of you know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor,
5 not in lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God.

It's not necessary to say, of course, but the very few times that it is stated in the Bible, I believe that it's definitely time to sit up and take notice. "This is the will of God". IOW, just so everyone is clear and there's no mistake about it, the command to "abstain from sexual immorality" IS "the will of God" for the Christian (and for everyone else for that matter).

It's also interesting to note the ending, which clearly tells us that sexual immorality is an act against our new nature (as Christians), as well a sign that the man/woman who "claims" to be a Christian may not be one at all (if this kind of sin is habitual, like it is for the reprobate, rather than a one-time falling to temptation that is confessed and repented of).

Yours and His,
David

Ephesians 5
1 Be imitators of God, as beloved children;
2 and walk in love, just as Christ also loved you and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God as a fragrant aroma.
3 But immorality or any impurity or greed must not even be named among you, as is proper among saints;
4 and there must be no filthiness and silly talk, or coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks.
5 For this you know with certainty, that no immoral or impure person or covetous man, who is an idolater, has an inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God.

.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One of my very favorite "inappropriate contenteia" passages is this one.

1 Thessalonians 4
3 This is the will of God, your sanctification; that is, that you abstain from sexual immorality;
4 that each of you know how to possess his own vessel in sanctification and honor,
5 not in lustful passion, like the Gentiles who do not know God.

.

Yes, this is a powerful passage.

I still remember more than 20 years ago when a seminary professor told our class, "I know God's will for you." He then went on to discuss the passage you quoted above. I used that a few times myself.
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,246
45,333
67
✟2,915,768.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
What advice would you give to young people struggling with desires for sex before marriage?
If they want Christ to remain #1 in their lives then I think I would tell them 1. never forget what you are and Who you belong to and love, and wish to please 2. don't be completely alone with one another, ever 3. get married sooner than later (if passions are overwhelming .. 1 Corinthians 7:9).
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,246
45,333
67
✟2,915,768.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Yes, this is a powerful passage.

I still remember more than 20 years ago when a seminary professor told our class, "I know God's will for you." He then went on to discuss the passage you quoted above. I used that a few times myself.
Smart professor :)
 
  • Agree
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,499
Milwaukee
✟410,918.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What advice would you give to young people struggling with desires for sex before marriage?

Any sex outside of commitment is hard on people. No matter what you are seeking for guidance in scripture, the foundation is commitment is the key to healthy sex.

Can you have sex outside of marriage? Sure. Most do.
But it's not healthy for body and mind. Knowing it's not
healthy will help a person refrain from damaging themselves.
And by "marriage" I mean an intention to commit to that one person.

I don't mean that civil laws or church ceremonies are the key.
The key is commitment to that one person you share your
intimacies with.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,172
9,191
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,152,592.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Recently a friend asked me if the Bible prohibits premarital sex. This friend takes the Bible very seriously and his question was honest and sincere. He could not find any clear statements in the Bible prohibiting premarital sex. It’s an important question. It certainly is relevant to our culture!

It’s important to note that my friend was not looking for justification to allow himself to have premarital sex. He is a faithful husband who loves his wife and seeks to live a life pleasing to God. And he doesn’t think premarital sex is a good idea. But he isn’t satisfied with basing his moral opinions on what most Christians think or what church leaders and Christian authors say. He wants a clear, rightly reasoned, Biblical basis for everything he believes. He wants people to obey all of God’s commands, but he doesn’t want us to make up rules for people that are not in the Bible and treat those rules as if they are from God. He is right to want a clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis for the standards we expect ourselves and others to live by.

In this Opening Post I will share why I believe the Bible does not support premarital sex. I will strive to provide the clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis my friend and others are looking for. Sometimes it is very easy to discern the Biblical teaching on an issue. For example, having sex with another man’s wife is clearly, repeatedly, explicitly condemned throughout the Bible. Adultery is always wrong. But the case against premarital sex is not as simple. The case is strong, but it will take several pages to explain it.

What the Bible Doesn’t Say and Why this Doesn’t Settle the Issue

There is not a simple statement like “Do not have sex before you are married”, or “Only have sex after you are married”. Does this mean that premarital sex is allowed, at least under some circumstances? Not necessarily.

The Bible includes prohibitions against hurting your neighbor in a number of ways, but there is not a specific statement saying “You may not poison your neighbor.” They knew about poison in Biblical times, and the Bible mentions poison but never gives an explicit law against using poison. Nevertheless, we know it is wrong to poison someone. We know this because we are able to apply broad commands and principles found in the Bible to many specific situations not named in the Bible. The Bible says, “Love does no harm to a neighbor” (Romans 13:10). Based on this, it is quite obvious that poisoning your neighbor is sin.

Is there a similar argument against premarital sex? I’m convinced there is, but it is not as immediately obvious as the argument against poisoning your neighbor.

The Bible’s Broad and Repeated Condemnation of Sexual Immorality

There are a number of broad warnings in the Bible against “sexual immorality”. The phrase “sexual immorality” often translates the Greek word inappropriate contenteia. Here are some examples: 2 Corinthians 12:21, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, Colossians 3:5.

I believe that the term “sexual immorality” is an excellent translation for inappropriate contenteia. The term includes any type of sin which is sexual in nature. Sometimes inappropriate contenteia refers to adultery. Matthew 5:32 is a good example of this because Jesus is discussing a sexual sin which a wife commits. But in Matthew 15:9 inappropriate contenteia is included in a list of sins along with the more specific Greek word for adultery (which is moicheia). Because none of the other sins in the list are two names for the same sin, I think this indicates that inappropriate contenteia includes sin other than adultery. The fact that there are multiple types of inappropriate contenteia is also supported by 1 Corinthians 5:1, where Paul mentions “a kind” of inappropriate contenteia.

The idea that in the New Testament inappropriate contenteia was used to refer to a broad range of types of sexual immorality is supported by the Greek lexicons I am able to consult. Here are the relevant excerpts from three widely used lexicons:

Premarital%2BSex.jpg


These lexicon entries demonstrate that prohibitions against “sexual immorality” in the New Testament cover more than adultery. To see that these prohibitions include premarital sex we will have to look at the Old Testament background which is required to more fully understand the meaning of New Testament teachings.

All Parts of the Bible are Relevant

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

It is true that many parts of the Old Testament law code given to Israel as a nation do not directly apply to us today. However, it would be a great and serious error to think that because these laws do not apply directly they do not apply at all. There are truths and principles we can see in these laws which teach us God’s will. They also help us understand the commands in the New Testament, which do apply directly and fully.

In Deuteronomy and Exodus We See that Premarital Sex is a Serious Sin

This passage is worth reading in full:

Deuteronomy 22:13 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then hates her
14 and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, 'I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,'
15 then the father of the young woman and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of her virginity to the elders of the city in the gate.
16 And the father of the young woman shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man to marry, and he hates her;
17 and behold, he has accused her of misconduct, saying, "I did not find in your daughter evidence of virginity." And yet this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the cloak before the elders of the city.
18 Then the elders of that city shall take the man and whip him,
19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the father of the young woman, because he has brought a bad name upon a virgin of Israel. And she shall be his wife. He may not divorce her all his days.
20 But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman,
21 then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father's house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.
On the one hand, we are no longer required to whip a man who falsely accuses his new wife of not being a virgin, nor to stone a woman who is discovered not to be a virgin on her honeymoon.

On the other hand, we must remember that Deuteronomy is inspired by God. Why would God say that a man “accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name on her” by claiming a woman was not a virgin when she got married if in fact there is nothing wrong in God’s eyes with premarital sex? Why would the man be whipped and fined if he was not making a serious false accusation of sin? Furthermore, why would God say she has “done an outrageous sin” which is similar to “whoring” if the ONLY thing there is evidence of is that she had premarital sex? Why should she be stoned!? All of this only makes sense if God views not being a virgin when you get married to be a serious sin. And the only way you become not a virgin is premarital sex. (In this post I’m not discussing the case of rape, which is among the most terrible and evil of all sins. In the case of rape, a woman is no longer a virgin physically, but in God’s eyes she is completely pure and innocent, and should be in our eyes as well.)

This same principle is seen in the case of a man who seduces an unmarried woman:

Exodus 22: 16-17 If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride-price for virgins.

The Hebrew word translated “seduces” is patah. It usually carries a negative meaning such as “deceive” or “entice” as can be seen in here:

Proverbs 1:10 My son, if sinners entice (patah) you, do not consent.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, then why does God use a word which generally means to deceive or to entice to sin to describe a man talking a virgin into having premarital sex? And if the father does not allow the man to marry his daughter, why is the man forced to pay anything if premarital sex is not wrong?

These Old Testament passages demonstrate that God does view sex before marriage as wrong. This in turn means that premarital sex is a type of sexual immorality and that when the New Testament speaks against sexual immorality in general, this includes premarital sex. It is like poisoning your neighbor. There is not an explicitly spelled out prohibition in the New Testament, but broad prohibitions include these things (poisoning people and premarital sex) as sins.

What About Premarital Sex with the Person You Plan to Marry?

Someone might object that the examples in Deuteronomy and Exodus above would not seem to apply if a young couple was planning to get married and they both agreed, without coercion, to have sex beforehand. After all, in such a case the husband would obviously have no right to be upset because his wife was not a virgin!

There are at least three problems with this line of reasoning.

The first problem is that no matter how certain you feel that you are going to marry someone, you do not know for sure that you will actually marry them until you are pronounced husband and wife. We can make plans that we fully intend to carry out and yet those plans do not always come to pass. James warns us about this:

James 4:13 Now listen, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money."
14 Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.
15 Instead, you ought to say, "If it is the Lord's will, we will live and do this or that."
16 As it is, you boast in your arrogant schemes. All such boasting is evil.​

Sadly, there have been many young people who really, truly believed they were going to marry someone, and based on this belief they went ahead and had sex. Then something happened and they did not marry that person. James warns that if you think this kind of thing can’t happen to you, you are being arrogant.

But, even if you do end up marrying the person, this still does not mean that premarital sex was right.

The second reason premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is wrong is that it is contrary to the Holy Spirit inspired advice given by the Apostle Paul. Paul addresses the specific case of a person who is not yet married and who feels a strong desire to go ahead and have sex before marriage. Again, it is helpful to quote the relevant portions of an extended passage:

1 Corinthians 7:1 Now for the matters you wrote about: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman."
2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.
3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. . . .
7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. . . .
36 If anyone is worried that he might not be acting honorably toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if his passions are too strong and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married.​


Paul says something that may seem shocking to our sex-saturated, anything goes, culture: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” Sex is not like water, food, or air. We can actually live without it.

Yet, Paul is also realistic (the Bible always is!). He realizes that many of us will struggle intensely with sexual desire. He speaks specifically here to the unmarried. Today’s solution to this problem is to go ahead and have sex. Paul’s solution, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is to direct unmarried people with a strong desire for sex to go ahead and get married.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, why would Paul speak of a young man who is having trouble controlling himself with the virgin he is planning to marry as “not . . . acting honorably”? If Paul thought premarital sex was ok, shouldn’t he have said something like, “If you’re planning to marry someone and feel like you can’t wait, don’t feel guilty about it, just go for it!” How different Paul’s Holy Spirit inspired thinking is from the popular way of thinking in our culture.

The third problem with the tempting idea that it is ok to have premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is that even if in your case you do get married, you are setting a bad example for others:

Romans 14:21 It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.

Sexual immorality is rampant in our culture. It is causing huge harm in terms of the spread of disease, children being raised without both parents in the home, and emotional damage. Even if in your case these specific negative consequences do not occur, if you engage in premarital sex you will be encouraging others to. Try explaining, “It’s ok for me, but not for you.”

What Counts as Sex?

Sometimes people who are dating want to get around the prohibition on sexual immorality by engaging in all types of sexual acts short of intercourse. Is this right?

There are two Bible passages which lead me to believe that any type of interaction intended to be sexually stimulating counts as “sex” when it comes to obeying God’s commands. The first passage is this one:

Matthew 5:28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

It would be absurd to think that you can’t look lustfully at a girl but it is ok to do sexually arousing things short of intercourse.

The second passage is one we already looked at, but we need to look at a more literal translation:

(NAU) 1 Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the things about which you wrote, it is good for a man not to touch a woman.

Some translations translate the Greek word for “touch” in this verse as “have sexual relations with” or something similar. But the word literally means “touch”. In this context it is clearly talking about touching in a sexual way. But this could include all kinds of touching short of sexual intercourse.

What if I’ve Already Blown It?

If you’ve already had premarital sex, there is hope for you in Christ Jesus. As with any sin you should:

confess
repent
believe
avoid

Confess: You have to begin by submitting to God’s Word and agreeing with God that your actions were sinful.

Repent: You express to God a deep desire to turn away from your sin and with God’s help to stop sinning. You cannot promise you will never stumble again, but you must be truly committed to stopping your sin with God’s help. If you have no intention of obeying God then you should not think that you will inherit the Kingdom of God (see 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). If you are truly striving in Christ to put your sin to death and flee from sexual immorality, you can know that you are forgiven and that God will strengthen you in your battle with sin.

Believe: Believe God’s promise that your sins are forgiven and cleansed by His grace in Christ Jesus (see 1 John 1:9). You do not have to carry a burden of guilt. Your shame is washed away. You are free!

Avoid: The devil and your own flesh and the world around you will try to entice you to fall back into sin. Expect a spiritual battle. Flee from sin! It might not be easy, but don’t give up. In a previous post, I shared some ideas which can help you overcome temptation.

I close with a prayer:

May the Lord keep you from falling into temptation. May He guard your eyes, your thoughts, and your actions. If you have already stumbled in this area, may He lead you to repentance. May you find forgiveness and cleansing and freedom from shame. And may you begin to live in victory. Thank you, Lord, for Your good and righteous commands, for Your forgiveness when we sin, and for Your help and strength when we face temptation. Amen.

This was initially a post on my blog.

Well reasoned, and I think almost anyone reading the Bible would agree that any kind of casual sex is wrong biblically -- that sex should mean life long commitment without reservation. Permanent. But....I started wondering: what does the Bible say "marriage" is, so that we can know when it is?

We know of marriage traditions, which are cultural, and that's not what I'm asking about of course.

As best I can tell, regardless of several very good things we can do in a marriage ceremony, the real heart of marriage is commitment, a promise. And....it seems God binds the two together in their act of consummation. I'm quite willing to learn more or differently or otherwise.

So, 3 questions:
What is marriage precisely? (I'm not asking about our cultural tradition which we all already know about).
Is a marriage valid if one of the two did not truly commit in their own heart?
Is a marriage complete if they did not consummate?
When is a marriage -- is it at the moment of a real promise given?

Hypothetical situation: two people marooned on an island, no pastor to wed them.... I think it must be they can get married. Right?

Now, practically, when a young person asks, I tell them wait, because "love is patient", and if they can't prove patience....then....is it really love?

---

I'm not trying to just ask difficult questions. These really matter at times.

Also, we see too often people that "marry" but they weren't married in their hearts it seems later.

And we sometimes see couples that "didn't get married" but they are totally faithful and committed, and still together.

So, that contrast can happen sometimes around us -- the "married" getting 'divorced', and the "unmarried" (our word)....staying totally faithful and together 20 years on.

Which couple were really married?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Any sex outside of commitment is hard on people. No matter what you are seeking for guidance in scripture, the foundation is commitment is the key to healthy sex.

Can you have sex outside of marriage? Sure. Most do.
But it's not healthy for body and mind. Knowing it's not
healthy will help a person refrain from damaging themselves.
And by "marriage" I mean an intention to commit to that one person.

I don't mean that civil laws or church ceremonies are the key.
The key is commitment to that one person you share your
intimacies with.

What type of commitment?
Lifelong?
As long as one stays "in love"?
How should the commitment be expressed?
Vows?
 
  • Like
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,172
9,191
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,152,592.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not trying to just ask difficult questions. These really matter at times.

Also, we see too often people that "marry" but they weren't married in their hearts it seems later.

And we sometimes see couples that "didn't get married" but they are totally faithful and committed, and still together.

So, that contrast can happen sometimes around us -- the "married" getting 'divorced', and the "unmarried" (our word)....staying totally faithful and together 20 years on.

Which couple were really married?
 
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
27,246
45,333
67
✟2,915,768.00
Country
United States
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
3 questions:
What is marriage precisely? (I'm not asking about our cultural tradition which we all already know about).

Hi Halbhh and Mark, I hope you two don't mind if I jump in with some thoughts. It seems to me that, from the beginning (pre-Fall), marriage was to be a permanent joining together of a man and a woman, such that they became one (flesh) .. Genesis 2:23-24; Mark 10:6-9. This permanency can also be seen in the fact that even in divorce, the Lord still sees the need to honor the original marriage covenant between the man and his wife as something that is forever (well, at least on this side of Glory anyway) .. e.g. Mark 10:11-12.

Marriage is still a big deal today, of course, but back in the 1st Century, a marriage celebration could last for a week or more. At least the Jews of that day really recognized and celebrated how important marriage was and what it meant for the people involved (and their families), the physical, emotional, spiritual, and legal joining together of two lives into one forever.

Is a marriage valid if one of the two did not truly commit in their own heart?

Yes! Marriage, like love, is a choice we make. IOW, it's far more than just an emotional entanglement with another person.

I'm pretty sure the RCC would not agree however, so maybe we should ask or look into the RCC reasons for seeing that a marriage may not have been valid from the beginning, thus giving their priests leave to grant the annulments they do.

edit: I found this sort of official looking list of RC grounds for granting an annulment if anyone is interested: http://www.stmarys-waco.org/documents/Grounds for Marriage Annulment in the Catholic Church.pdf

Also, if memory serves, Pope Francis changed the official annulment process this year to make it easier, more expedient, and more inclusive.

One of my friends took pictures of his three children with him, slammed them down on his priest's desk (after his priest had just granted his wife an annulment from their marriage) and said to him, "annul these" ;)

Is a marriage complete if they did not consummate?

I don't think so. Mark?

Yours and His,
David
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Also, if memory serves, Pope Francis changed the official annulment process this year to make it easier, more expedient, and more inclusive.

One of my friends took pictures of his three children with him, slammed them down on his priest's desk (after his priest had just granted his wife an annulment from their marriage) and said to him, "annul these" ;)
I believe the scriptures used to support Roman Catholic annulment comes from here:

1 Corinthians 7: NKJV

10 Now to the married I command, yet not I but the Lord: A wife is not to depart from her husband. 11 But even if she does depart, let her remain unmarried or be reconciled to her husband. And a husband is not to divorce his wife.

12 But to the rest I, not the Lord, say: If any brother has a wife who does not believe, and she is willing to live with him, let him not divorce her. 13 And a woman who has a husband who does not believe, if he is willing to live with her, let her not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is sanctified by the wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified by the husband; otherwise your children would be unclean, but now they are holy. 15 But if the unbeliever departs, let him depart; a brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases. But God has called us to peace. 16 For how do you know, O wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, O husband, whether you will save your wife?



By the above the man who slapped down the pictures would be justified in stating "I'm staying." Which means the woman should not divorce him.

What's interesting about the bolded above last two verses is that there is no mention of being able to remarry if an unbelieving spouse abandons the marriage.

However, I know of two cases where people tried an annulment and failed. One woman who graduated RCIA tried to get a 12 year marriage with kids annulled due to her husband refusing to go to church and raising the kids in the faith.

Another woman tried to annul a marriage a friend of mine was in. He was Baptist and she later became Catholic. Her parish priest advocated the annulment but it was scratched at higher levels. They had kids too. The thing she never mentioned to the priest was she had a publicly known adulterous affair. Her husband's friendconfessed it to my friend because there were eyewitnesses (I shall stop there as I don't want to explain).

The marriage ended up in divorce and the father got custody of the children. She later married and then divorced the man she had the adulterous affair with.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not trying to just ask difficult questions. These really matter at times.

Also, we see too often people that "marry" but they weren't married in their hearts it seems later.

And we sometimes see couples that "didn't get married" but they are totally faithful and committed, and still together.

So, that contrast can happen sometimes around us -- the "married" getting 'divorced', and the "unmarried" (our word)....staying totally faithful and together 20 years on.

Which couple were really married?

Several have asked about situations where there is commitment without a formal marriage.

I'll share a few of my thoughts:

1. It is difficult for me to imagine a realistic scenario in the US where I would advise a couple to be "married" in God's eyes without a formal, legal marriage. If a couple were already in this situation, I would encourage them to get married unless there was a strong reason not to, in which case I would encourage them to break up.

2. IF someone views themselves as married without a formal marriage, I believe the same Biblical principles apply to them as to other married couples. They should be committed to be faithful to each other, specifically including having sex with no one else, until parted by death. The same Biblical grounds for divorce would apply to them.

3. People might have many different types of motives for wanting to live together without a legal, formal marriage. In many cases it is likely that at least one of them is "hedging their bets" and wants an easy way out if things don't work out. When this is part of the motive, it is wrong and sinful. And how can we know if this is part of the motive? They may not even be fully aware of what is driving their fears and desires. This is one reason (not the only one) that I believe "informal marriages" are at best unwise, if not outright sinful.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Another thought about premarital sex of any kind. Sometimes there are country, pop, or rock songs which basically reminisce about some sexual activity before marriage they had a long time ago as if it was something good and wonderful. But I don't know a single mature Christian who engaged in any type of premarital sex and who looks back on it as something positive. In every case, they regret it. Often they deeply regret it. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but in hindsight it was not.
 
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,172
9,191
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,152,592.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Another thought about premarital sex of any kind. Sometimes there are country, pop, or rock songs which basically reminisce about some sexual activity before marriage they had a long time ago as if it was something good and wonderful. But I don't know a single mature Christian who engaged in any type of premarital sex and who looks back on it as something positive. In every case, they regret it. Often they deeply regret it. It seemed like a good idea at the time, but in hindsight it was not.

Right. For before-marriage, already engaged sex, when a young person asks, I tell them wait, because "love is patient", and if they can't prove patience, then it might not be real love. Waiting they will lose nothing, but likely deepen their relationship. There can be unusual situations where they have already waited years, and then I'd recommend a simple wedding, at lower cost.

About the 2 stranded on an island question above, it's fine to not answer, because I already know the answer -- marriage is from above, not from us here doing a ceremony.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mark Corbett
Upvote 0

Halbhh

Everything You say is Life to me
Supporter
Mar 17, 2015
17,172
9,191
catholic -- embracing all Christians
✟1,152,592.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hi Halbhh and Mark, I hope you two don't mind if I jump in with some thoughts. It seems to me that, from the beginning (pre-Fall), marriage was to be a permanent joining together of a man and a woman, such that they became one (flesh) .. Genesis 2:23-24; Mark 10:6-9. This permanency can also be seen in the fact that even in divorce, the Lord still sees the need to honor the original marriage covenant between the man and his wife as something that is forever (well, at least on this side of Glory anyway) .. e.g. Mark 10:11-12.

Marriage is still a big deal today, of course, but back in the 1st Century, a marriage celebration could last for a week or more. At least the Jews of that day really recognized and celebrated how important marriage was and what it meant for the people involved (and their families), the physical, emotional, spiritual, and legal joining together of two lives into one forever.



Yes! Marriage, like love, is a choice we make. IOW, it's far more than just an emotional entanglement with another person.

I'm pretty sure the RCC would not agree however, so maybe we should ask or look into the RCC reasons for seeing that a marriage may not have been valid from the beginning, thus giving their priests leave to grant the annulments they do.

edit: I found this sort of official looking list of RC grounds for granting an annulment if anyone is interested: http://www.stmarys-waco.org/documents/Grounds for Marriage Annulment in the Catholic Church.pdf

Also, if memory serves, Pope Francis changed the official annulment process this year to make it easier, more expedient, and more inclusive.

One of my friends took pictures of his three children with him, slammed them down on his priest's desk (after his priest had just granted his wife an annulment from their marriage) and said to him, "annul these" ;)



I don't think so. Mark?

Yours and His,
David

First a point to consider -- where I said " truly commit in their own heart" I mean a real commitment, and not an 'entanglement' or any other thing like infatuation or even 'love', but I'm speaking about the choice in the heart to commit, to promise. The interior choice, as contrasted to the external words of promise. The truth in the 'heart', the inner thoughts. Is the person really committing. It's not that mind or will doesn't matter! They matter quite a lot. But that they are not all of us. Without a....commitment in the heart, even if after the ceremony, even if years on, without that....I wonder if a lack on that level is the real cause of marriage failure. Will is far from a guarantee. The heart decides, usually.

We agree that marriage is because God joins the two, and it's a key, or even the only key, thing. It's a mystery partially to me.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Corbett

Well-Known Member
Supporter
Jun 1, 2017
893
744
59
Severn, NC
Visit site
✟172,170.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
We agree that marriage is because God joins the two, and it's a key, or even the only key, thing. It's a mystery partially to me.

Yes, God joins two people into one, and this is a mystery.

I think this is partly referring to the way God made us so that sexual intimacy is much more than a physical act. Sexual intimacy creates a type of oneness which is beautiful and good between a husband and wife. But even when sex occurs outside of God's given boundaries, it still creates a level of "oneness", only it becomes unhealthy and damaging:

1 Corinthians 6: 15 Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ himself? Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
16 Do you not know that he who unites himself with a prostitute is one with her in body? For it is said, "The two will become one flesh."
17 But whoever is united with the Lord is one with him in spirit.
18 Flee from sexual immorality. All other sins a person commits are outside the body, but whoever sins sexually, sins against their own body.
19 Do you not know that your bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit, who is in you, whom you have received from God? You are not your own;
20 you were bought at a price. Therefore honor God with your bodies.​
 
  • Agree
Reactions: redleghunter
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Tetra

Well-Known Member
Dec 18, 2016
1,223
708
41
Earth
✟64,448.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Recently a friend asked me if the Bible prohibits premarital sex. This friend takes the Bible very seriously and his question was honest and sincere. He could not find any clear statements in the Bible prohibiting premarital sex. It’s an important question. It certainly is relevant to our culture!

It’s important to note that my friend was not looking for justification to allow himself to have premarital sex. He is a faithful husband who loves his wife and seeks to live a life pleasing to God. And he doesn’t think premarital sex is a good idea. But he isn’t satisfied with basing his moral opinions on what most Christians think or what church leaders and Christian authors say. He wants a clear, rightly reasoned, Biblical basis for everything he believes. He wants people to obey all of God’s commands, but he doesn’t want us to make up rules for people that are not in the Bible and treat those rules as if they are from God. He is right to want a clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis for the standards we expect ourselves and others to live by.

In this Opening Post I will share why I believe the Bible does not support premarital sex. I will strive to provide the clear and carefully reasoned Biblical basis my friend and others are looking for. Sometimes it is very easy to discern the Biblical teaching on an issue. For example, having sex with another man’s wife is clearly, repeatedly, explicitly condemned throughout the Bible. Adultery is always wrong. But the case against premarital sex is not as simple. The case is strong, but it will take several pages to explain it.

What the Bible Doesn’t Say and Why this Doesn’t Settle the Issue

There is not a simple statement like “Do not have sex before you are married”, or “Only have sex after you are married”. Does this mean that premarital sex is allowed, at least under some circumstances? Not necessarily.

The Bible includes prohibitions against hurting your neighbor in a number of ways, but there is not a specific statement saying “You may not poison your neighbor.” They knew about poison in Biblical times, and the Bible mentions poison but never gives an explicit law against using poison. Nevertheless, we know it is wrong to poison someone. We know this because we are able to apply broad commands and principles found in the Bible to many specific situations not named in the Bible. The Bible says, “Love does no harm to a neighbor” (Romans 13:10). Based on this, it is quite obvious that poisoning your neighbor is sin.

Is there a similar argument against premarital sex? I’m convinced there is, but it is not as immediately obvious as the argument against poisoning your neighbor.

The Bible’s Broad and Repeated Condemnation of Sexual Immorality

There are a number of broad warnings in the Bible against “sexual immorality”. The phrase “sexual immorality” often translates the Greek word inappropriate contenteia. Here are some examples: 2 Corinthians 12:21, Galatians 5:19, Ephesians 5:3, Colossians 3:5.

I believe that the term “sexual immorality” is an excellent translation for inappropriate contenteia. The term includes any type of sin which is sexual in nature. Sometimes inappropriate contenteia refers to adultery. Matthew 5:32 is a good example of this because Jesus is discussing a sexual sin which a wife commits. But in Matthew 15:9 inappropriate contenteia is included in a list of sins along with the more specific Greek word for adultery (which is moicheia). Because none of the other sins in the list are two names for the same sin, I think this indicates that inappropriate contenteia includes sin other than adultery. The fact that there are multiple types of inappropriate contenteia is also supported by 1 Corinthians 5:1, where Paul mentions “a kind” of inappropriate contenteia.

The idea that in the New Testament inappropriate contenteia was used to refer to a broad range of types of sexual immorality is supported by the Greek lexicons I am able to consult. Here are the relevant excerpts from three widely used lexicons:

Premarital%2BSex.jpg


These lexicon entries demonstrate that prohibitions against “sexual immorality” in the New Testament cover more than adultery. To see that these prohibitions include premarital sex we will have to look at the Old Testament background which is required to more fully understand the meaning of New Testament teachings.

All Parts of the Bible are Relevant

2 Timothy 3:16-17 All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work.

It is true that many parts of the Old Testament law code given to Israel as a nation do not directly apply to us today. However, it would be a great and serious error to think that because these laws do not apply directly they do not apply at all. There are truths and principles we can see in these laws which teach us God’s will. They also help us understand the commands in the New Testament, which do apply directly and fully.

In Deuteronomy and Exodus We See that Premarital Sex is a Serious Sin

This passage is worth reading in full:

Deuteronomy 22:13 "If any man takes a wife and goes in to her and then hates her
14 and accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name upon her, saying, 'I took this woman, and when I came near her, I did not find in her evidence of virginity,'
15 then the father of the young woman and her mother shall take and bring out the evidence of her virginity to the elders of the city in the gate.
16 And the father of the young woman shall say to the elders, 'I gave my daughter to this man to marry, and he hates her;
17 and behold, he has accused her of misconduct, saying, "I did not find in your daughter evidence of virginity." And yet this is the evidence of my daughter's virginity.' And they shall spread the cloak before the elders of the city.
18 Then the elders of that city shall take the man and whip him,
19 and they shall fine him a hundred shekels of silver and give them to the father of the young woman, because he has brought a bad name upon a virgin of Israel. And she shall be his wife. He may not divorce her all his days.
20 But if the thing is true, that evidence of virginity was not found in the young woman,
21 then they shall bring out the young woman to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her to death with stones, because she has done an outrageous thing in Israel by whoring in her father's house. So you shall purge the evil from your midst.
On the one hand, we are no longer required to whip a man who falsely accuses his new wife of not being a virgin, nor to stone a woman who is discovered not to be a virgin on her honeymoon.

On the other hand, we must remember that Deuteronomy is inspired by God. Why would God say that a man “accuses her of misconduct and brings a bad name on her” by claiming a woman was not a virgin when she got married if in fact there is nothing wrong in God’s eyes with premarital sex? Why would the man be whipped and fined if he was not making a serious false accusation of sin? Furthermore, why would God say she has “done an outrageous sin” which is similar to “whoring” if the ONLY thing there is evidence of is that she had premarital sex? Why should she be stoned!? All of this only makes sense if God views not being a virgin when you get married to be a serious sin. And the only way you become not a virgin is premarital sex. (In this post I’m not discussing the case of rape, which is among the most terrible and evil of all sins. In the case of rape, a woman is no longer a virgin physically, but in God’s eyes she is completely pure and innocent, and should be in our eyes as well.)

This same principle is seen in the case of a man who seduces an unmarried woman:

Exodus 22: 16-17 If a man seduces a virgin who is not betrothed and lies with her, he shall give the bride-price for her and make her his wife. If her father utterly refuses to give her to him, he shall pay money equal to the bride-price for virgins.

The Hebrew word translated “seduces” is patah. It usually carries a negative meaning such as “deceive” or “entice” as can be seen in here:

Proverbs 1:10 My son, if sinners entice (patah) you, do not consent.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, then why does God use a word which generally means to deceive or to entice to sin to describe a man talking a virgin into having premarital sex? And if the father does not allow the man to marry his daughter, why is the man forced to pay anything if premarital sex is not wrong?

These Old Testament passages demonstrate that God does view sex before marriage as wrong. This in turn means that premarital sex is a type of sexual immorality and that when the New Testament speaks against sexual immorality in general, this includes premarital sex. It is like poisoning your neighbor. There is not an explicitly spelled out prohibition in the New Testament, but broad prohibitions include these things (poisoning people and premarital sex) as sins.

What About Premarital Sex with the Person You Plan to Marry?

Someone might object that the examples in Deuteronomy and Exodus above would not seem to apply if a young couple was planning to get married and they both agreed, without coercion, to have sex beforehand. After all, in such a case the husband would obviously have no right to be upset because his wife was not a virgin!

There are at least three problems with this line of reasoning.

The first problem is that no matter how certain you feel that you are going to marry someone, you do not know for sure that you will actually marry them until you are pronounced husband and wife. We can make plans that we fully intend to carry out and yet those plans do not always come to pass. James warns us about this:

James 4:13 Now listen, you who say, "Today or tomorrow we will go to this or that city, spend a year there, carry on business and make money."
14 Why, you do not even know what will happen tomorrow. What is your life? You are a mist that appears for a little while and then vanishes.
15 Instead, you ought to say, "If it is the Lord's will, we will live and do this or that."
16 As it is, you boast in your arrogant schemes. All such boasting is evil.​

Sadly, there have been many young people who really, truly believed they were going to marry someone, and based on this belief they went ahead and had sex. Then something happened and they did not marry that person. James warns that if you think this kind of thing can’t happen to you, you are being arrogant.

But, even if you do end up marrying the person, this still does not mean that premarital sex was right.

The second reason premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is wrong is that it is contrary to the Holy Spirit inspired advice given by the Apostle Paul. Paul addresses the specific case of a person who is not yet married and who feels a strong desire to go ahead and have sex before marriage. Again, it is helpful to quote the relevant portions of an extended passage:

1 Corinthians 7:1 Now for the matters you wrote about: "It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman."
2 But since sexual immorality is occurring, each man should have sexual relations with his own wife, and each woman with her own husband.
3 The husband should fulfill his marital duty to his wife, and likewise the wife to her husband. . . .
7 I wish that all of you were as I am. But each of you has your own gift from God; one has this gift, another has that.
8 Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do.
9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion. . . .
36 If anyone is worried that he might not be acting honorably toward the virgin he is engaged to, and if his passions are too strong and he feels he ought to marry, he should do as he wants. He is not sinning. They should get married.​


Paul says something that may seem shocking to our sex-saturated, anything goes, culture: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” Sex is not like water, food, or air. We can actually live without it.

Yet, Paul is also realistic (the Bible always is!). He realizes that many of us will struggle intensely with sexual desire. He speaks specifically here to the unmarried. Today’s solution to this problem is to go ahead and have sex. Paul’s solution, inspired by the Holy Spirit, is to direct unmarried people with a strong desire for sex to go ahead and get married.

If there is nothing wrong with premarital sex, why would Paul speak of a young man who is having trouble controlling himself with the virgin he is planning to marry as “not . . . acting honorably”? If Paul thought premarital sex was ok, shouldn’t he have said something like, “If you’re planning to marry someone and feel like you can’t wait, don’t feel guilty about it, just go for it!” How different Paul’s Holy Spirit inspired thinking is from the popular way of thinking in our culture.

The third problem with the tempting idea that it is ok to have premarital sex with someone you sincerely plan to marry is that even if in your case you do get married, you are setting a bad example for others:

Romans 14:21 It is good not to eat meat or drink wine or do anything that causes your brother to stumble.

Sexual immorality is rampant in our culture. It is causing huge harm in terms of the spread of disease, children being raised without both parents in the home, and emotional damage. Even if in your case these specific negative consequences do not occur, if you engage in premarital sex you will be encouraging others to. Try explaining, “It’s ok for me, but not for you.”

What Counts as Sex?

Sometimes people who are dating want to get around the prohibition on sexual immorality by engaging in all types of sexual acts short of intercourse. Is this right?

There are two Bible passages which lead me to believe that any type of interaction intended to be sexually stimulating counts as “sex” when it comes to obeying God’s commands. The first passage is this one:

Matthew 5:28 But I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.

It would be absurd to think that you can’t look lustfully at a girl but it is ok to do sexually arousing things short of intercourse.

The second passage is one we already looked at, but we need to look at a more literal translation:

(NAU) 1 Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the things about which you wrote, it is good for a man not to touch a woman.

Some translations translate the Greek word for “touch” in this verse as “have sexual relations with” or something similar. But the word literally means “touch”. In this context it is clearly talking about touching in a sexual way. But this could include all kinds of touching short of sexual intercourse.

What if I’ve Already Blown It?

If you’ve already had premarital sex, there is hope for you in Christ Jesus. As with any sin you should:

confess
repent
believe
avoid

Confess: You have to begin by submitting to God’s Word and agreeing with God that your actions were sinful.

Repent: You express to God a deep desire to turn away from your sin and with God’s help to stop sinning. You cannot promise you will never stumble again, but you must be truly committed to stopping your sin with God’s help. If you have no intention of obeying God then you should not think that you will inherit the Kingdom of God (see 1 Corinthians 6:9-10). If you are truly striving in Christ to put your sin to death and flee from sexual immorality, you can know that you are forgiven and that God will strengthen you in your battle with sin.

Believe: Believe God’s promise that your sins are forgiven and cleansed by His grace in Christ Jesus (see 1 John 1:9). You do not have to carry a burden of guilt. Your shame is washed away. You are free!

Avoid: The devil and your own flesh and the world around you will try to entice you to fall back into sin. Expect a spiritual battle. Flee from sin! It might not be easy, but don’t give up. In a previous post, I shared some ideas which can help you overcome temptation.

I close with a prayer:

May the Lord keep you from falling into temptation. May He guard your eyes, your thoughts, and your actions. If you have already stumbled in this area, may He lead you to repentance. May you find forgiveness and cleansing and freedom from shame. And may you begin to live in victory. Thank you, Lord, for Your good and righteous commands, for Your forgiveness when we sin, and for Your help and strength when we face temptation. Amen.

This was initially a post on my blog.
I'm not saying sex before marriage is okay, but I really find your arguments weak if I'm honest. The problem with this forum, is that disagreement with your position can be viewed as "promotion" of premarital sex, which is against the TOS, so I'll avoid that one.

If I was to take your position though, I'd argue this completely different than you have here, or simply not at all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: dayhiker
Upvote 0