Gnarwhal
☩ Broman Catholic ☩
- Oct 31, 2008
- 20,859
- 12,589
- 38
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Kensington7 said:I don't think you proved me wrong at all.
I don't believe that events in Revelation happened already, I believe they are yet to come.
I think that theory you teach is completely false. In my studies for my Biblical Studies degree, Daniel and Revelation was a great course. They are the two picture books of the bible and Daniel helps us to understand the things John saw.
I gave no evil answer either, I don't want to be insulted. Don't try to bully me. I will report that. I gave a "saved by faith" answer. I didn't realize that you were the only one allowed to answer this question. I thought the OP was inviting what many of us may have learned and understand.
I never said that anything you said was evil, and you don't have to resort to ad hominem statements to give your argument weight, if anything it's counterproductive.
Partial-Preterism and Amillennialism aren't false, full/hyper-preterism, sure.
zeke37 said:if it was not a tagible mark in Ex13, Deut6 and Deut11, why would it be literal in Rev?
The apocalyptic language in Revelation describes the events that were to happen soon, which came to fruition during the reign of the Roman Empire and it's leaders the Caesars.
Kensington7 said:Where is your proof that Jesus Himself came back and stood on earth and cast Him (the Beast) and his one world religious leader into the pit?
Christ is yet to return, that and the resurrection of the dead and the marriage of heaven and earth in the new creation. That doesn't change the fact that the beast was the Roman Empire and 666 points to Nero.
Upvote
0