This is the nature of most research done at seminaries or universities on the text of scripture or the exegetical meaning of a passage, or theology, or systematics.
If you are Catholic, the magesterium handles these issues. But for us Protestants we are free to argue for the best explanation of the biblical data. That is to say, if there are several înferences say to how God foreknows the future, open theism, molinism, Calvinism, Arminianism. Historically the two held sway. But we are free to test the explanatory power of molinism and open theism against fulfilled prophecy and the like.
Cautionary note: avoid gaining new inferences on the Trinity, or nature of Christ, or his work on the cross without exhausting the old inferences. While foreknowledge, and end times study are interesting, if we get the inference wrong, little to no damage is done.But new interpretations around Jesus's nature or work are the source of a majority of the cult groups and church heresies.
P.S.
If you don't know the difference between exegetical and eisogeting a passage, or the rules of hermeneutics, you may want to leave the new interpretations to the scholars.
