This is in response to John 8. Please open your Bibles or use the internet. Start with verse 1 and work your way down to verse 11. Read all the way down. Jesus ends up claiming to be God and then THEY TRY TO STONE HIM. Anyways...
Under the Law you were only to be put to death after a fair trial and then only after the testimony of two witnesses "Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee".
Where was the man she committed adultery with hmm? Surly if she really was caught in the act they would have been able to produce not only witnesses but both guilty parties. Under the law both the adulterer and adulteress where to be executed not just the adulteress. Where was the man she slept with? Not about to be stoned that is for sure or he would have been mentioned as well. I smell something fishy. I smell a kangaroo court!
Under the Mosaic Law THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN MURDER!!!!
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
"And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last:"
This makes a lot more sense now doesn't it? Why would they be convicted in their own conscience? Because they were about to murder a woman and violate the law of Moses themselves and they knew it. Murder is worse then adultery BTW.
Also lets not forget that they were trying to trap Jesus!!!!
"This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him."
Under Roman Law only the Roman Government could execute prisoners or those convicted of capitol offences. They were trying to get Jesus in trouble.
Jesus treated the those who tried to cover or self righteously justify their sins differently then those who were repentant. Those hypocrites who judge others for judging, call good evil and evil good, defend the wicked, and try to self righteously justify their sins are exactly the sort he went of on.
Jesus called people pigs, dogs, sons of their father the devil, whitened sepulchers, liars, thieves, and hypocrites and turned over tables and drove the money changers from the temple but at the same time protected the woman about to be stoned, forgave the woman at the well, recruited Mathew the tax collector, Saul of Tarsus, forgave the woman at the well as well as dinned with Zacchaeus the tax collector.
WAS JESUS BIPOLAR? NO! He treated the repentant and those who would repent differently then the hard hearted, unrepentant, and self righteous hypocrites.
He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. - Proverbs 17:15
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! - Isaiah 5:20
Under the Law you were only to be put to death after a fair trial and then only after the testimony of two witnesses "Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee".
Where was the man she committed adultery with hmm? Surly if she really was caught in the act they would have been able to produce not only witnesses but both guilty parties. Under the law both the adulterer and adulteress where to be executed not just the adulteress. Where was the man she slept with? Not about to be stoned that is for sure or he would have been mentioned as well. I smell something fishy. I smell a kangaroo court!
Under the Mosaic Law THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN MURDER!!!!
"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her."
"And they which heard it, being convicted by their own conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, even unto the last:"
This makes a lot more sense now doesn't it? Why would they be convicted in their own conscience? Because they were about to murder a woman and violate the law of Moses themselves and they knew it. Murder is worse then adultery BTW.
Also lets not forget that they were trying to trap Jesus!!!!
"This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him."
Under Roman Law only the Roman Government could execute prisoners or those convicted of capitol offences. They were trying to get Jesus in trouble.
Jesus treated the those who tried to cover or self righteously justify their sins differently then those who were repentant. Those hypocrites who judge others for judging, call good evil and evil good, defend the wicked, and try to self righteously justify their sins are exactly the sort he went of on.
Jesus called people pigs, dogs, sons of their father the devil, whitened sepulchers, liars, thieves, and hypocrites and turned over tables and drove the money changers from the temple but at the same time protected the woman about to be stoned, forgave the woman at the well, recruited Mathew the tax collector, Saul of Tarsus, forgave the woman at the well as well as dinned with Zacchaeus the tax collector.
WAS JESUS BIPOLAR? NO! He treated the repentant and those who would repent differently then the hard hearted, unrepentant, and self righteous hypocrites.
He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord. - Proverbs 17:15
Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter! - Isaiah 5:20
Last edited: