I’ve only seen this happen for statements I’d consider to be really extreme, and damaging, and I have been in support. As far as I can recall, in most cases the statement or action involved racism.
I think we can all agree that racism is wrong. But Christianity teaches that we are all sinners, we do not deserve redemption, and yet God gives it to us freely. It's only in the largely secular sphere of SJW activism that racism is considered the 'ultimate wrong', and has the status of 'unforgivable act' or 'unforgiveable thought'.
I’ve been happy that a bad person who made hurtful public statements on social media lost their job before, yes.
Why be happy? On the scale of life changing events, job loss is high on the list for most people. It's going to severely damage their life chances. Why rejoice in the misfortune or impending misery of others? What good does it do?
No, I don’t feel sad when a bigot loses their job for being a mean person. On rare occasion, people need to lose their job to learn about what is appropriate. People lose their job for unjust reasons all the time, and that does upset me very much. But we are talking about bullies and abusers here. They need to be ostracized, not coddled.
Case in point - I am thrilled that this fireman, who clearly has a sadistic bent, is no longer in a position of power. Bigots should not be in a position of power, ever.
I would say that firing someone is a wasted opportunity. Many times it will probably just create a bitter, confused person who only learned to keep their views private. Far better to try and educate them as part of disciplinary proceedings. Although I can accept that when someone does the same thing 3-4 times and is on their last warning then firing them may be the only course of action left. Educating people isn't 'coddling' them, it's helping them to be a better, more aware, more responsible person.
Do you wonder about dependents who need to be fed when a person gets caught stealing and is fired? We’re talking about gross misconduct. I’m a union rep. Part of my job is fighting unjust discipline and firings. I’m well versed in the law and philosophy around just termination. If a person knows their behavior is not acceptable by the employer, and the rule in question is fair, then appropriate discipline is just. In a lot of these instances, people reveal themselves to have biases or attitudes towards other human beings that are repugnant. Those biases will inevitably affect a person’s behavior at work and treatment of coworkers. Character matters.
OK. I understand. You have zero empathy for others who may be caught up in the fallout of a firing.
. Absolutely not, that would be a violation of the first amendment.
You say that firing should not be legally mandatory, but you seem to support firing as an extra-judicial punishment administered outside of a court of law. And it is a harsh punishment, because the impact will be so severe.
I suppose that because of the kind of work I do I have become a good judge on the matter. It’s something I contemplate and weigh a lot. But that’s not really relevant here.
Perhaps we all do. It’s human nature.
You are right. We all do. Judging people is one of the weaknesses we all have as humans. And if I'm totally honest I'm probably doing it a little here myself, while trying my best not to. But I think we have a duty to reign it in, show empathy and compassion, and forgive others as they forgive us.
I don’t really care about helping the employer, to be honest. People make a stink so that the employer feels obligated to do something. That’s the point. Often, employers don’t care and it is only the social pressure that gets them to do the right thing.
If the employer isn't reacting to complaints, then that would be a fault of the employer and their employment procedures, or (lack of) application of their procedures. As someone who says they work in this area you should know that.
Of course it would be quite possible to name the employer on social media, and the alleged behaviour of the employer, but without revealing the identity of the employee. But that doesn't happen, and I suspect it's because the baying online mob just want the blood (job) of the employee. No matter what someone has done, vindictiveness is always an ugly human emotion. But in your own words 'you don't really care'.
No, I’ve never been fired or laid off. But I represent about 1,000 people who are laid off right now and I spend hours each day dealing with the effects and fighting so that they don’t fall through the cracks.
Even after working with people who are losing their jobs, you still have so little empathy or compassion for the impact of job loss! Yes, they did wrong, but there are usually better, much more constructive ways to deal with it than a firing.
. I am acutely aware of the impacts of job loss. I simply think that public racism and/or bullying are as serious as stealing or drinking on the job. If a person, for instance, expresses extreme disrespect for women on social media and makes rape jokes then I don’t feel that women should have to work with that man. People get fired for so much less these days. People get fired just for being absentminded or for not kowtowing appropriately to customers and supervisors. Does that bother you as much?
It's always concerning if people are fired without being given a chance to improve. In Christianity most people believe that repentance is a journey rather than an act.
. Well it depends on what they said, of course. Sadistic remarks/ jokes, made publicly, about running protesters over, while simultaneously mocking black lives matter? This guy is an idiot and shouldn’t be in charge of anything or anyone.
How much of that is a crime in law, or should be a crime? I'll agree that it's inappropriate, offensive, and tasteless, but I still think that firing is disproportionate, particularly for a first incident. People who have done wrong need to be given education, training, and a chance to change. That's how you help them to become better people. Firing them will probably just make them bitter, confused people, who change their behaviour outwardly, but not inwardly, and for all the wrong reasons.