We are decedents of space traveler’s; not monkeys

[curiouskay]

We are decedents of space traveler’s; not monkeys​

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans have been humans since making our first step on this planet.

Earth was formed 4.543 billion years ago

The earth was covered entirely in ice 2.6 million years ago (climate change debate is over)

Homo sapiens first walked on this planet 200,000 years ago. So humans have been around for a mere 0.004% of the Earth's history.

It was not evolution that transformed us into what we are today, it was the seed of life that visitors “planted” on this planet.

Just as we will do on another life supporting planet in our near future.

We are aliens on our own planet

The question remaining is when will they say hello?
This thread was created to facilitate discussion, so go for it.
BTW I have supporting evidence​

Now let the debate begin -

 

[Winken]

Did mosquitos come before or after aliens?

 

[HitchSlap]

We are decedents of space traveler’s; not monkeys​

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans have been humans since making our first step on this planet.

Earth was formed 4.543 billion years ago

The earth was covered entirely in ice 2.6 million years ago (climate change debate is over)

Homo sapiens first walked on this planet 200,000 years ago. So humans have been around for a mere 0.004% of the Earth's history.

It was not evolution that transformed us into what we are today, it was the seed of life that visitors “planted” on this planet.

Just as we will do on another life supporting planet in our near future.

We are aliens on our own planet

The question remaining is when will they say hello?
This thread was created to facilitate discussion, so go for it.
BTW I have supporting evidence​

Now let the debate begin -

You have no evidence.

 

[SeventyOne]

Cool story bro. Tell me another.

 

[Kylie]

We are decedents of space traveler’s; not monkeys​

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans have been humans since making our first step on this planet.

Earth was formed 4.543 billion years ago

The earth was covered entirely in ice 2.6 million years ago (climate change debate is over)

Homo sapiens first walked on this planet 200,000 years ago. So humans have been around for a mere 0.004% of the Earth's history.

It was not evolution that transformed us into what we are today, it was the seed of life that visitors “planted” on this planet.

Just as we will do on another life supporting planet in our near future.

We are aliens on our own planet

The question remaining is when will they say hello?
This thread was created to facilitate discussion, so go for it.
BTW I have supporting evidence​

Now let the debate begin -

Then why is our genetic code made up of the same basic building blocks? Why are our internal organs so similar to those of monkeys?

What are the chances that aliens and monkeys would be so similar when there are other Earth life forms that are so completely different to monkeys? Why would aliens be more similar than other Earth life forms?

 

[Chesterton]

Then why is our genetic code made up of the same basic building blocks? Why are our internal organs so similar to those of monkeys?

What are the chances that aliens and monkeys would be so similar when there are other Earth life forms that are so completely different to monkeys? Why would aliens be more similar than other Earth life forms?

I have a hybrid theory which I think may explain this: Space Monkeys!! Yay, Space Monkeys!

 

[Presbyterian Continuist]

I guess it's easier to believe in monkeys and space travellers than to believe in a God who formed a man out of dirt and breathed life into him, and then took a rib from the man and made a woman out of it.

 

[ihnoa]

I'm pretty sure that you're supposed to present your evidence before the debate begins, otherwise there is nothing to debate except a vacuous claim.

 

[Gene2memE]

I'm the descendant of space monkeys!

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

We are decedents of space traveler’s; not monkeys​

Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans have been humans since making our first step on this planet.

Earth was formed 4.543 billion years ago

The earth was covered entirely in ice 2.6 million years ago (climate change debate is over)

Homo sapiens first walked on this planet 200,000 years ago. So humans have been around for a mere 0.004% of the Earth's history.

It was not evolution that transformed us into what we are today, it was the seed of life that visitors “planted” on this planet.

Just as we will do on another life supporting planet in our near future.

We are aliens on our own planet

The question remaining is when will they say hello?
This thread was created to facilitate discussion, so go for it.
BTW I have supporting evidence​

Now let the debate begin -

Hello

Who are these 'visitors'?

Cheers

 

[Tanj]

I guess it's easier to believe in monkeys and space travellers than to believe in a God who formed a man out of dirt and breathed life into him, and then took a rib from the man and made a woman out of it.

I agree on the first clause, not so much the second.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

I agree on the first clause, not so much the second.

Hello and God bless you

If you dont mind me asking, how so?

 

[Tanj]

Hello and God bless you

If you dont mind me asking, how so?

I think it's easier to believe man came from monkeys than from dirt. I don't know why anyone would believe it was space travelers, monkey or otherwise.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

I think it's easier to believe man came from monkeys than from dirt. I don't know why anyone would believe it was space travelers, monkey or otherwise.

Hey thanks for reply.

Apparently we have just as much in common with pigs. When it comes to belief in God, one must follow a formula to get the proof.

Have you considered giving God a shot?

 

[SolomonVII]

This reminds me of that one rather famous atheist scientists who believes that life on earth was seeded by extra terrestrials.

Does Dawkins Believe that Extraterrestrials Seeded Life On Earth?

 

[Tanj]

Hey thanks for reply.

Apparently we have just as much in common with pigs. When it comes to belief in God, one must follow a formula to get the proof.

We have quite alot in common with pigs, but we have more in common with monkeys.

Have you considered giving God a shot?

What response can I give that you would consider affirmative? What difference does it make? There's 2 billion Catholics and a swag of other denominations that believe in God and have no problem with monkey cousins.

You don't want me to give God a shot, you want me to give your interpretation of the bible a shot. There's a big difference between the two.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

We have quite alot in common with pigs, but we have more in common with monkeys.

Making broad comparisons by saying … 98 per cent of [human] genes are similar to a chimpanzee or whatever else … tend to be a little bit misleading," says Moran.

The amount of genetic material we share with other species depends upon what you compare.

What response can I give that you would consider affirmative? What difference does it make?

A yes or no would do

You don't want me to give God a shot, you want me to give your interpretation of the bible a shot. There's a big difference between the two

I just asked if you were willing to give God a shot. Im not asking you to become baptist or catholic

What do you know about God?

Cheers for reading

 

[Subduction Zone]

Making broad comparisons by saying … 98 per cent of [human] genes are similar to a chimpanzee or whatever else … tend to be a little bit misleading," says Moran.

The amount of genetic material we share with other species depends upon what you compare.

That is true. But the exact same nested hierarchy is still there. We are closest to chimps, a bit less close to gorillas, even more distant from orangutans.

A yes or no would do



I just asked if you were willing to give God a shot. Im not asking you to become baptist or catholic

What do you know about God?

Cheers for reading

Almost every atheist here "gave God a shot". But God is irrelevant to the question of evolution. Most Christians, that also believe in God, also accept the theory of evolution.

A literal interpretation of Genesis is not necessary to be a Christian.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

That is true. But the exact same nested hierarchy is still there. We are closest to chimps, a bit less close to gorillas, even more distant from orangutans.



Almost every atheist here "gave God a shot". But God is irrelevant to the question of evolution. Most Christians, that also believe in God, also accept the theory of evolution.

A literal interpretation of Genesis is not necessary to be a Christian.

Hello and God bless.

At this point in time im not interested in a discussion with you. Thank you for the reply and i hope where ever you are, you are safe and healthy.

Maybe another time

Cheers hey

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

That is true. But the exact same nested hierarchy is still there. We are closest to chimps, a bit less close to gorillas, even more distant from orangutans.



Almost every atheist here "gave God a shot". But God is irrelevant to the question of evolution. Most Christians, that also believe in God, also accept the theory of evolution.

A literal interpretation of Genesis is not necessary to be a Christian.

Hey sorry i have a few discussions on so this one seemed bit too much. While im waiting i cant resist.

How did u give God a shot?